Home / business / DOJ: Voting machine maker must sell some assets

DOJ: Voting machine maker must sell some assets

WASHINGTON – The Justice Department said March 15 it will require the biggest voting machine company in the country to sell off key assets following a merger that left the firm in control of more than 70 percent of U.S. voting equipment systems.

The federal government and nine state attorneys general filed a lawsuit March 15 saying the combination last September of Election Systems & Software and its biggest competitor harms competition.

Under a proposed settlement, ES&S would sell voting equipment system assets it bought from Premier Elections Solutions Inc., a subsidiary of Diebold Inc. The proposed settlement, to which both sides have agreed, must be approved by a federal judge before it becomes final.

The assets include the means to produce all versions of Premier’s hardware and software that record, tabulate, transmit or report votes.

Before the merger, ES&S, headquartered in Omaha, Neb., had systems installed in 41 states and collected $149.4 million in 2008, the Justice Department said. Premier, as the second-largest voting machine company, had equipment installed in 33 states and had $88.3 million in revenue in 1988.

The proposed settlement will restore competition, provide a greater range of choices and create incentives to provide secure, accurate and reliable voting equipment systems, said Molly S. Boast, deputy assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s antitrust division.

Under the proposed settlement, the buyer of the assets must be a company approved by the Justice Department.

The state attorneys general who joined in the lawsuit were from Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Mexico, Tennessee and Washington.

Copyright 2018 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

One comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also

Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., takes his seat before the start of a House Judiciary hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Dec. 7, 2017, on Oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Franks says in a statement that he never physically intimidated, coerced or attempted to have any sexual contact with any member of his congressional staff. Instead, he says, the dispute resulted from a discussion of surrogacy. Franks and his wife have 3-year-old twins who were conceived through surrogacy. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

Suits seek to bar 2 Democrats seeking ex-Rep. Franks’ seat

Two of three Democrats running in the special primary election to replace former U.S. Rep. Trent Franks are facing lawsuits challenging their right to appear on the ballot.