Quantcast
Home / Opinion / Commentary / Don’t rush a bad immigration bill

Don’t rush a bad immigration bill

Every now and then a crisis emerges in which our response clearly displays what kind of people we are. Whether it is natural disaster or a man-made political crisis, our reaction sends an important message to others about our values, our sense of responsibility and how we solve problems.

Our elected state representatives will vote on S1070, a bill that sets immigration policy for every county, city and town in Arizona and unfortunately lays the groundwork for unnecessary, discriminatory and harmful government intrusions, all in the name of border security.

While SB1070 purports to address the failure of government to enforce the rule of law and make us safer, it does not. It makes us less safe, places a crippling unfunded mandate on our cities, towns and counties, damages our state’s economy and codifies racial discrimination. Moreover, it does nothing to address the root causes of the immigration problem.

S1070 makes us less safe by redirecting local law enforcement’s attention away from stopping or investigating murders, rapes, property crimes, arson and other violent crimes by mandating a focus on immigration enforcement. It does not provide money for staff and officer training, or for attorneys to defend against the inevitable lawsuits. It also doesn’t provide the additional staff needed to handle enforcement or data collection required at all levels of government.

Businesses need to know they can operate in a politically stable and economically sound environment. S1070 threatens economic recovery by exposing every business to the threat of unwarranted police raids, frivolous lawsuits, and loss of property or business licenses simply because they may have hired or transported someone who may turn out to be undocumented.

S1070 isolates the Latino community from police protection as even citizens will avoid reporting crimes, identifying criminal perpetrators or becoming witnesses simply because they believe they will become suspects in their home country and state. We believe this is one reason for increased gang-related crimes in Arizona, because gangs know their identities are safe behind a wall of fear.

We wholeheartedly agree that the murder of citizens and police officers, property and drug crimes, kidnappings and violence on the border must stop. We agree there is no excuse for hiring undocumented workers. And, while we firmly support the rule of law, history shows that a civil society cannot survive a network of police informants focused on one ethnic group. Furthermore, we are alarmed that such a flawed and dangerous bill might be adopted so that election-year politicians can say, “we’re upholding the law,” when in fact, most municipal police and public officials oppose the bill.

Business and religious leaders are deeply troubled that the bill’s sponsors – Sen. Russell Pearce, a Mesa Republican, and Rep. David Gowan, a Republican from Sierra Vista, seem unwilling to seriously address such an array of toxic consequences while rushing head long for a vote in the Legislature. At a time of great economic uncertainty, it astounds us that politicians insist on moving forward with legislation even though they have been told time and again they’re getting it wrong.

Arizonans are getting impatient, and we clearly want immigration and border security issues resolved. However, we also want it done right. We understand the combination of election-year politics and failed immigration and border security issues. But there is no good reason to push a bill that threatens one of our most precious civic values: the right to go about our lives and business without fear of government harassment.

If Pearce and Gowan, Senate President Bob Burns, a Republican from Peoria, and House Speaker Adams, a Republican from Mesa, do not take time to reconsider the terrible damage this bill will do, then they should not hereafter expect support from our business, faith and Latino communities.

If our legislative leaders insist on passing this deeply flawed and pernicious bill, then they should be held accountable in the coming election and otherwise for killing jobs and for setting up a police system that crushes the rights of our people. Finally, if the bill should pass, it is then up to Gov. Brewer to protect our businesses, our economy and our sacred rights by vetoing SB1070.

If there is a right message to the world here, that’s the one we need to send.

-This commentary was authored by the Arizona Employers for Immigration Reform Board of Directors: Sheridan Bailey, Richard Usher, Dick Walden, Nan Stockholm Walden, Bill Perry and Jan Thurgood; and the Arizona Interfaith Network, which includes the Rev. Glenn Jenks, the Valley Interfaith Council, the Yuma County Interfaith Sponsoring Committee and the Northern Arizona Interfaith Council.

8 comments

  1. The root of this bill is the fact that the Federal gov’t isn’t doing their job as required by the Constitution. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the States to affirm their sovereignty by upholding the Constitution under the 10th Amendment. The excuses listed to not support this bill are unproven suppositions and scare tactics.

    The reality is this bill is a deterrent to illegals to stay in this state and either self deport or move on to more friendly states. It is obvious that these people have never been victims of illegals who are coming across the border in droves. It also gives the police the ability to perform their jobs without being handcuffed by “sanctuary” policies.

    This bill must by passed by every legislator who took an oath to the Constitution today. We voters will be holding your feet to the fire if you do not vote for protecting the border, protecting American citizens from crimes, and protecting American citizens from having their tax dollars wasted on illegals which has caused our budget imbalance. Time to man up and vote FOR the people instead of AGAINST them.

  2. The root of this bill is Pearce’s desire for power. He developed his mandate by going from house to house telling his constituents that “Vincente Fox was arming Mexicans and sending them into our state to take over our homes and lands.” A lot of very old ladies and men, and a lot of fairly ignorant and naive middle-aged people have hung on to his rhetoric which is farfetched and erroneous. But perception is reality…for those who live with hate, fear and ignorance as their guideposts. Too bad for Arizona, and too bad for Mesa. This legislation is very poor legislation. And Pearce is something else.

  3. Illegal aliens are called that because they are here illegally. IF they would cease to be here illegally, whatever that takes, then the need of such a law would not exist. If you are caught in Mexico “illegally” the consequences are much worse. I don’t see anyone protesting their law(s).

  4. what happens if they decide to stop someone who is legal and they have no papers because they are legal but the police dont believe them?

  5. Living in Maine, I was talking to some legal immigrants why they came this far North for work, they reported that they are being pushed out of the South because the illegals are taking their jobs. They all fully supported the Immigration law passed in Arizona, and felt that law enforcement should have the right to ask for identification.

  6. it is imposible to enforce this new law without VIOLATING THE CIVIL HUMAN RIGHTS

  7. Civil rights?
    lol….what a joke go to MEXICO ask about CIVIL RIGHTS FOOL, try being Illegal in MEXICO “HIPPA_KRIT”
    GET EDUCATED ABOUT MEXICO,
    Follow the LAW, THAT IS THE RULE
    do not reward LAWLESS MOBS PROTESTING what in MEXICO IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ILLEGALS THERE!!!,

    SO LETS FOLLOW MEXICAN LAW
    THEY GOT THAT PART RIGHT!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Scroll To Top