Quantcast
Home / Opinion / Letters to the Editor / Huppenthal’s plan on teacher salaries gets an ‘F’

Huppenthal’s plan on teacher salaries gets an ‘F’

I heard John Huppenthal on the news recently and, as a teacher, I am afraid by what I heard. I am afraid for my job and my students.

Most of us grew up in the public education system and believe ourselves to be experts on education, but that is far from reality. Educating students is a very immense task. It requires dedication and intelligence, but it also requires teachers to attempt to overcome obstacles that are completely out of their control.

Mr. Huppenthal, our newly elected state schools chief, said he would like to see 50 percent of a teacher’s salary based on student achievement. In my school district, teachers make, on average, $34,000 a year. Having $17,000 of your salary based on how well your students perform is terrifying.

I agree that there are teachers who are not effective and should not be in the classroom, but there are other ways to solve the problem, such as instructional coaching or evaluations out of education.

There are many factors that need to be considered that impact the success of students. At my school, this year, the average class size is higher than district recommendations, with one kindergarten class at 26 students. There is no money to hire another teacher. With large class sizes, teachers cannot give students the individual attention they need as often as they need it.

On average, each class has at least one special-needs student and at least 50 percent are second-language learners. Students are recognized as having a specific learning disability if there is a large discrepancy between their achievement and their ability level. Students who are of lower intelligence do not qualify to receive any special services because they are “working at their ability.”

Teachers of students who have low ability always hate to hear that their students do not qualify for special services, but the truth is that it is not a disability to be of lower than average intelligence.

This year we have four students above second grade with no knowledge of English. Statistically, children who have no English at all acquire the language more slowly the older they get. Students in all-day kindergarten can start the year with no English at all and leave at the end of the year fluent. This does not hold true for students in fifth grade.

Students who have lower intelligence struggle even more to master the language. Yet, in spite of these issues, teachers choose to work with these students because they know that their efforts make a difference.

I agree that the most important part to ensuring a quality education for students is to have quality teachers teaching them. That is, beyond a doubt, the most important thing. However, basing 50 percent of a teacher’s minimal salary on student achievement is not the way to ensure quality teaching. In our district, we have been trying hard to retain quality teachers, but it is very difficult when the district cannot afford to pay them to stay.

Would you expect a doctor to only receive 50 percent of his pay if his patients are not all healthy? Would you base 50 percent of a policeman’s pay on how well the residents of his town obey the law? Would we base a politician’s salary on how well he keeps the residents of his state happy?

By putting 50 percent of a teacher’s salary at risk based on the performance of their students, teachers may not be willing to teach students with special needs, with lower intelligence or with limited English proficiency. In charter schools, a charter can be written in such a way that all those students are prohibited from enrolling, but public schools must and should serve everyone.

We teach everyone, regardless of his or her gender, ethnicity, home life, English proficiency, economic situation, parental support, attendance or intelligence. We greet each student every day they are in our classrooms and give them our best, despite the lack of materials, technology or pay. We experience every triumph and failure of our students as if they were our own.

Mr. Huppenthal, please visit the schools, classrooms and teachers across Arizona and talk to us before you decide our fate.

— Sonyia M. Roy, M.Ed., Bullhead City

4 comments

  1. Another disingenuous tirade by a public school teacher, probably of the union variety. Sen. Huppenthal is spot on, in my opinion, something must be done. In the second largest school district in the state, less than half of the funding goes to the classroom, so it is not the taxpayer’s fault for not funding schools as implied by this screed.

    Also, using the average salary of $34,000 does not cut it, as the school teacher makeup generally is teachers over $50,000 and those just out of college making $20,000 something, not the average as stated. And remember, it is still part time work.

    All of the problems given by the opponent in this letter are the same problems experienced by the parochial schools, many in poor neighborhoods and heavily Latino, and they perform amirably on far less money and larger classes. And instead of passing these students on to the next grade even though they cannot read as standard procedure, why not keep them back? No, this would hurt their self esteem.

    And I did not notice any suggestions on how to improve public education, just more bleatings, and moronic comparisons to other professions, some you can choose, (doctors), and others you can determine how good of a job they are doing, something missing in our public school system. And perhaps the complaintant would work for the $24,000 paid our legislators?

    Either come up with some solutions to our lousy public school system or quit your whining. Salud to our new Superintendent!

  2. I fully agree with Guest’s Opinion. A Teacher cannot “MAKE” someone learn if they don’t want to. Each person has a different level of mentality to learn. A person cannot retain and regurgitate facts on a moment’s notice as in a test. Education for the most part should be knowing where to look for facts and information. Some people are not able to memorize everything and maintain it. Yes, it is important that everyone know correct English grammar and writing skills and also basic math skills in order to function in today’s society. The comparison to other professionals and their salaries is excellent.

  3. Part Time? Let’s look at the math.

    40 hours per week x 50 weeks per year = 2000 hours.

    I am a high school teacher. I have 12 weeks of “vacation” a year, two of which I’m busy spending my own money to keep certified. That’s 10 weeks of “vacation”. My minimal work week is 55 hours. I spend approximately 15 hours per week working at home, mostly planning and grading papers.

    Now…

    55 hours per week x 42 weeks per year = 2310 hours.

    Are you aware of the stress and extra-curricular activity involved with this profession? I love my job, and I make a difference in kids’ lives. Do you want my job? Step into my shoes before you make such harsh judgements.

  4. Jeff, Jeff, Jeff – so ignorant of the realities of public education, so happily accepting of generic, mostly non-factual criticisms of public schools. Allow me two rebuttals:
    “the school teacher makeup generally is teachers over $50,000 and those just out of college making $20,000 something” – by your own brilliant fact finding, those two ends pretty much average $35000. This is what Ms. Roy CLEARLY stated was the AVERAGE salary in HER school district. Oh wait, perhaps that’s my public school math education giving me the upper hand in discerning facts…

    “the same problems experienced by the parochial schools, many in poor neighborhoods and heavily Latino, and they perform amirably (sic) on far less money and larger classes” – please name some of these examples, and then please identify exactly on what their admirably good performance is based, as well as how their parent volunteer programs are staffed.

    Ms. Roy’s astute comparisons of how one pays doctors and police officers is brilliant – and this beautifully exemplifies one of the biggest problems in public education. Students in private/parochial schools are there because their parents make an active choice to enroll them. That already differentiates them from the public schools as parent interest and involvement is intrinsically higher at enrollment. As you cannot control the home life, motivations and personal behaviors of your patients and community, I’m sure doctors and police officers would be equally appalled if their salaries were based on the performance of their clientele.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Scroll To Top