Quantcast
Home / Opinion / Letters to the Editor / Inadequate site review process could spell disaster for Resolution mine

Inadequate site review process could spell disaster for Resolution mine

Your May 31 article on the mine near Superior “Gosar seeks broad support for Resolution Copper land-swap bill” fails to mention the hopelessly inadequate public review process allowed in the proposed legislation.  If the bill is passed, the Interior Department has one year to finalize the exchange.  At that point, some 2,400 acres of land around the mine site would become Resolution’s private property, and the federal nexus required for review as provided for under the National Environmental Policy Act is lost.

This is no way to allow construction of what some consider the largest proposed mine in the lower 48 states.  The environmental impacts are guaranteed to be enormous, from land subsidence the size and depth of Meteor Crater to massive tailings piles around Highway 60 to contaminated and depleted ground and surface water.  Yes, the mine would create some jobs, but if I were a betting man I’d wager more workers would need to be hired cleaning up the mess after closure than during operation.

— Don Steuter, Phoenix

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 

x

Check Also

prison-bars

Drug sentencing in Arizona – reality versus rhetoric

The American Friends Service Committee’s (AFSC) recent report, “Drug Sentencing in Arizona: A Prescription for Failure,” relies upon faulty analysis and inadequate research to inaccurately depict Arizona as an incarceration-first state, and blames our sentencing statutes for our substance abuse problems. Arizona’s sentencing statutes are not responsible for our substance abuse problems. People abusing drugs, both prescription and illicit, are the real reason for our substance abuse problems.