Quantcast
Home / agencies / Lawsuit targeting Arpaio over dog-death case settled

Lawsuit targeting Arpaio over dog-death case settled

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio (right) (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)

Lawyers tentatively settled a lawsuit by a Chandler police officer who accused Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio of violating his rights by arresting the officer in the death of his police dog.

Police Sgt. Tom Lovejoy settled his case against Arpaio on Friday, just days before jury selection in the civil case was set to begin.

Lovejoy was charged with animal abuse in the August 2007 death of his police dog, a Belgian Malinois named Bandit. The dog died from excessive heat after being left in a hot police vehicle for 12 hours in Arizona’s blistering summer heat.

Lovejoy was acquitted of the top-tier misdemeanor charge and accused Arpaio of trumping up the criminal case against him in the death of the officer’s police dog so Arpaio could exploit the publicity from this case.

Arpaio argues that Lovejoy lacks evidence connecting the sheriff to Lovejoy’s arrest and, in any event, that various legal doctrines shield the sheriff.

Both sides are providing conflicting figures on the amount of the settlement. Arpaio’s office said the case was settled for $175,000, while Lovejoy’s attorney said the settlement amount was $775,000. In any case, the settlement must still be approved by county officials before the deal is completed.

The sheriff’s office noted in a written statement that Lovejoy originally sought $800,000 and that the settlement gave the police agency a chance to make a prudent financial decision. “I will continue to enforce animal cruelty laws at every turn,” Arpaio said.

Lovejoy’s attorney, Michael Manning, said it was wise for Arpaio’s office to settle the case. “Our verdict would have been quite higher, so it was prudent for them to settle,” Manning said.

The sheriff denied that he made the decision to arrest Lovejoy, and his detectives said they felt no pressure from Arpaio.

Lovejoy had had little sleep and had worked extra shifts in the days leading up to the dog’s death. When a boss awakened him on a call, the officer put the dog in the SUV but was called back. He left the dog in the vehicle and it died.

The story was propelled by a mug shot of the dog. The photo, which appeared regularly in newspapers and on TV in the summer of 2007, tugged at people’s hearts. The photo shows a sweet-faced dog with his head cocked to one side and ears pointing upward.

After the investigation was concluded, a sheriff’s investigator asked Lovejoy to come downtown. Arpaio was doing a news conference announcing Lovejoy’s arrest as Lovejoy was driving to the sheriff’s office. Then he got a call from a news reporter about his arrest during the drive. He was arrested once he got there, according to a December ruling by U.S. District Judge Neil Wake.

He was charged with a top-tier misdemeanor in leaving the dog unattended in the SUV. A year after the animal’s death, a justice of the peace found Lovejoy not guilty of the charge.

A prosecutor specializing in animal cruelty cases concluded the case was weak. He and another prosecutor refused to continue prosecuting Lovejoy, so another prosecutor was found, according to Wake’s ruling.

The judge ruled that investigators uncovered no evidence that Lovejoy recognized that he was leaving the dog in the SUV or had any reason to harm the dog. And the judge said there was no probable cause to arrest Lovejoy. “No reasonable person could think it did,” Wake wrote in his December ruling.

The judge also wrote there was enough evidence that could make a reasonable jury could conclude that Arpaio made the executive decision to arrest Lovejoy, or acquiesced in others’ decision to do so, and had reckless disregard toward Lovejoy as he sought publicity.

Lovejoy is still a police officer in Chandler, but no longer works as a dog handler for the agency.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

One comment

  1. Sheriff v the local police. What about the Sheriff’s canines who have died that the public never hears about? One standard for the sheriff (Arizona’s God) and another for the police.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Scroll To Top