<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brewer signs bill letting ‘religiously oriented’ employers opt out of contraception coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2012/05/14/brewer-signs-bill-letting-religiously-oriented-employers-opt-out-of-contraception-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2012/05/14/brewer-signs-bill-letting-religiously-oriented-employers-opt-out-of-contraception-coverage/</link>
	<description>Your Inside Track to Arizona Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:23:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChicagoCatt</title>
		<link>http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2012/05/14/brewer-signs-bill-letting-religiously-oriented-employers-opt-out-of-contraception-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-72493</link>
		<dc:creator>ChicagoCatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 21:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azcapitoltimes.com/?p=45695#comment-72493</guid>
		<description>So, for argument&#039;s sake...  based on this being a law that protects the religious freedoms of an organization...  If my organization is a Jehovah&#039;s Witness organization and one of my employees wants employer-provided insurance coverage for a blood transfusion, my organization doesn&#039;t have to provide that coverage. Right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, for argument&#8217;s sake&#8230;  based on this being a law that protects the religious freedoms of an organization&#8230;  If my organization is a Jehovah&#8217;s Witness organization and one of my employees wants employer-provided insurance coverage for a blood transfusion, my organization doesn&#8217;t have to provide that coverage. Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oraworldwide</title>
		<link>http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2012/05/14/brewer-signs-bill-letting-religiously-oriented-employers-opt-out-of-contraception-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-72473</link>
		<dc:creator>oraworldwide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 17:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azcapitoltimes.com/?p=45695#comment-72473</guid>
		<description>Religious freedom trumps individual freedom of choice for women.  There is no other way to look at this bill.  Now remember employers, women have the right to choose whom they will work for and if their individual choices are not met...go to an employer who cares about their choices.  If women want to change this law they also have the right to sue their religious employers for infringing on their federal and constitutional rights!  I am Catholic, but I still want to be free to make my own choices...not government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Religious freedom trumps individual freedom of choice for women.  There is no other way to look at this bill.  Now remember employers, women have the right to choose whom they will work for and if their individual choices are not met&#8230;go to an employer who cares about their choices.  If women want to change this law they also have the right to sue their religious employers for infringing on their federal and constitutional rights!  I am Catholic, but I still want to be free to make my own choices&#8230;not government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
