<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brewer signs bill protecting denial of services on religious grounds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2012/05/14/brewer-signs-bill-protecting-denial-of-services-on-religious-grounds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2012/05/14/brewer-signs-bill-protecting-denial-of-services-on-religious-grounds/</link>
	<description>Your Inside Track to Arizona Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:08:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalaurya</title>
		<link>http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2012/05/14/brewer-signs-bill-protecting-denial-of-services-on-religious-grounds/comment-page-1/#comment-72496</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalaurya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 22:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azcapitoltimes.com/?p=45692#comment-72496</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m assuming this means service can be denied to someone based on THEIR beliefs? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m assuming this means service can be denied to someone based on THEIR beliefs? <img src='http://azcapitoltimes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. E. Malloy</title>
		<link>http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2012/05/14/brewer-signs-bill-protecting-denial-of-services-on-religious-grounds/comment-page-1/#comment-72475</link>
		<dc:creator>D. E. Malloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 17:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azcapitoltimes.com/?p=45692#comment-72475</guid>
		<description>Republican Sen. Steve Yarbrough introduced the legislation, saying it’s “fundamentally wrong” that if “you don’t affirm the particular lifestyle, then your license is going to be at risk.”
************************************************************

Clearly, the only &quot;lifestyle&quot; that should be &quot;affirmed&quot; is that in which the chooser claims to have religion which apparently entitles them to abuse their position of power.  I find that fundamentally wrong with emphasis on the &quot;mental&#039; part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican Sen. Steve Yarbrough introduced the legislation, saying it’s “fundamentally wrong” that if “you don’t affirm the particular lifestyle, then your license is going to be at risk.”<br />
************************************************************</p>
<p>Clearly, the only &#8220;lifestyle&#8221; that should be &#8220;affirmed&#8221; is that in which the chooser claims to have religion which apparently entitles them to abuse their position of power.  I find that fundamentally wrong with emphasis on the &#8220;mental&#8217; part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
