Home / Home news / Judge picked for civil rights suit against Joe Arpaio

Judge picked for civil rights suit against Joe Arpaio

In this Dec. 21, 2011 file photo, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio speaks to the media in Phoenix. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin, File)

A judge has been assigned to preside over the U.S. Justice Department’s civil rights lawsuit against the Maricopa County Sheriff Office.

U.S. District Judge Roslyn Silver was randomly drawn as the judge to preside over the case.

A lawsuit filed by the Justice Department on May 10 alleges that Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s deputies racially profile Latinos in the sheriff’s trademark immigration patrols and that the sheriff’s office retaliated against critics of the patrols.

The sheriff has long denied the racial profiling allegations.

He says people are stopped if deputies have probable cause to believe they have committed crimes and that deputies later find many of them are illegal immigrants.

Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


  1. I really hope that the Sheriff gets a fair shake in this lawsuit.
    Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney General needs to be sued for “fast and furious”

  2. KK(K), You need to listen to the months of daily hearings at the Arizona Supreme Court disciplinary hearings against the now disbarred ex-Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas and his charging prosecutor, disbarred ex-DCA Lisa Aubuchon. Listen to the Sheriff and what others had to say about the abuse of power. It’s time for the sheriff to be indicted and sent to prison for what he has done to so many innocent people, families and children. There is a Constitution. The people have rights.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also


Arizona ordered to pay Planned Parenthood’s legal fees

The state of Arizona has been ordered to pay Planned Parenthood of Arizona and other abortion providers more than $600,000 in attorney fees and other costs they spent fighting a since-repealed law.