Quantcast
Don't Miss
Home / Election 2012 / Dems challenge GOP approach to education in District 20 debate

Dems challenge GOP approach to education in District 20 debate

kimberly yee

Dems challenge GOP approach to education in District 20 debate

Democratic candidates in Legislative District 20 pushed hard against their Republican opponents during a Clean Elections-sponsored debate in Glendale, highlighting the majority’s cuts to education funding. (From left) Democratic Senate candidate Michael Powell, Republican Senate candidate Kimberly Yee, Republican House candidate Paul Boyer, Democratic House Candidate Tonya Norwood, Republican House candidate Carl Seel and Democratic House candidate Jackie Thrasher. (Photo by Luige del Puerto/Arizona Capitol Times)

Democrats running in a Republican-leaning West Valley district zeroed in on the majority party’s decision to slash education funding during the fiscal crisis and keep it relatively flat even when the economy began to turn around.

The strategy was apparent during a Clean Elections-sponsored debate on Sept. 25, when Democratic candidates for the Senate and House in new Legislative District 20 attacked early and often.

In her opening statement, Tonya Norwood, a Phoenix Democrat who is running for a House seat, said education was “devalued” as funding was cut and teachers were mandated to do more with fewer resources with Republicans in charge.

But what really rubbed her wrong was a proposal to allow schools to opt out of the federal lunch program.

“This shook me,” she said, adding that for some children, the school lunch is their only meal for the day.

The measure ultimately went nowhere, but only after stirring considerable controversy at the state Capitol.

Meanwhile, Phoenix resident Michael Powell, the Democratic nominee to the Senate, complained that after 40 years of dominance at the Legislature, Republicans failed to produce an economy that’s better than Colorado’s, a state with a smaller population.

“Finally, the Legislature wouldn’t fund KidsCare at a cost of less than 2 percent of the Rainy Day fund,” he said, referring to failed attempts by Democrats to restore funding of the insurance program for children of low-income families.

Former Rep. Jackie Thrasher, a Democrat from Glendale, cited a study by Washington, D.C.-based Center on Budget and Policy priorities, which said Arizona holds the worst record for cutting the K-12 budget between fiscal years 2008 and 2013.

Rep. Kimberly Yee, R-Phoenix, the GOP nominee to the Senate, and Phoenix Republican Paul Boyer, who is running for the House, pushed back against the criticism.

Yee said she fought hard for education funding behind the scenes, suggesting the cuts could have been more severe without advocates like her.

But while Yee and Boyer highlighted their support for education, fellow Republican Rep. Carl Seel, of Phoenix, took a different route.

Seel talked about seeing improvements in his children once they moved to a charter school from a public school, which he said employed “a dilapidated system.”

He also boasted about discovering billions of dollars that school districts are supposedly sitting on. Seel is referring to the 2010-2011 annual report by the superintendent of public instruction, which showed that districts had a cash balance of $2.5 billion by June 30, 2011.

But Seel’s claims have always been controversial, and school officials refute the characterization that they’re sitting on a pile of cash.

Seel promised that if voters re-elect him, he’ll work to return the money to taxpayers.

But the Democrats largely succeeded in setting the tone of the debate, and in bringing the fight to the Republicans’ court.

When asked about Proposition 204, Democrats expressed their unequivocal support for the 1-cent sales tax initiative while Republicans said they opposed it.

The Republican candidates pointed out that not all of the revenues from the tax will go to education. Portions of the tax are earmarked for infrastructure projects and social welfare programs.

They said the current 1-cent tax increase is meant to be temporary, and they’d like to keep that promise to voters.

Yee said she hunkered down, away from the spotlight, to save education dollars, and that an additional

$150 million was set aside in the last budget for education.

Actually, lawmakers appropriated $75 million in new funding for education, including $40 million to improve reading by third grade.

When pressed about her ultimate support for budgets that cut education, kept school funding flat when the economy began to rebound and gave tax cuts to corporations, Yee replied, “There was a lot that we had to look at and protect and I believe that… we do need more in our education system.”

“It doesn’t matter who you’re voting for, if that’s an issue that is very important to you as it is to me, we have to look at the backgrounds of the people that we are selecting to represent us at the state Capitol,” she added.

In short, Yee is saying the voters should elect more centrist and pragmatic lawmakers like her.

Powell, the Democrat running against Yee, didn’t buy her explanation.

“She can say that, but publicly, if you don’t question the leadership, that means you’re lock step involved with them, and that’s the perception that she has,” Powell said, adding, “She does what the leadership tells her to do.”

2 comments

  1. Wow. I was at the debate. I’m a reporter for 40 years and I got a totally different picture.

    The Democrats were all for spending tax dollars and supporting Prop 204 – which is guaranteed to eliminate more jobs in Arizona. We have lost 30,000 jobs since the initial tax was levied in 2009.

    Since July, when Los Angeles lowered its sales tax rate 1%, Phoenix now has the highest sales tax in the nation.

    If you’re a company looking for a new location, are you going to screw your employees by locating to the nation’s highest sales tax? You can move to Texas which has no individual income tax, a sales tax capped at 8.7, or move to Nevada, again, no personal income tax and 8.1% sales tax, nearly 2% lower than Phoenix.

    As Paul Boyer tweeted about this article, “No word on how Ds would’ve paid 4 it”

    I’d also suggest Luige del Puerto stick to reporting and not editorializing in his or her writings if this person wants to be a journalist.

  2. Luige, why the need to put words in Ms Yee’s mouth? “In short, Yee is saying the voters should elect more centrist and pragmatic lawmakers like her.” Is this a news piece or an editorial? Or maybe a poorly disguised ad “paid for by” the lefties of LD 20? Ms Yee is quite capable of communicating with the people of her district with out the need for editorial translation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Scroll To Top