<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contribution limits to candidates need to be removed to curb outside spending</title>
	<atom:link href="http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2012/11/09/contribution-limits-to-candidates-need-to-be-removed-to-curb-outside-spending/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2012/11/09/contribution-limits-to-candidates-need-to-be-removed-to-curb-outside-spending/</link>
	<description>Your Inside Track to Arizona Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:08:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2012/11/09/contribution-limits-to-candidates-need-to-be-removed-to-curb-outside-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-79593</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 21:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azcapitoltimes.com/?p=53112#comment-79593</guid>
		<description>So let me get this straight, crappy candidate can&#039;t raise money in his own district so out side group comes in and floods the market with deceptive ads. Then the problem is determined to be the donation amount? Why isn&#039;t the problem the outside groups? Why do we allow lobbyists and PAC&#039;s to buy our elections? 

Get rid of the $516,000 in hateful attack ads and keep the contribution limits for real living and breathing people. If the candidate can&#039;t raise money from people in their district they deserve to lose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So let me get this straight, crappy candidate can&#8217;t raise money in his own district so out side group comes in and floods the market with deceptive ads. Then the problem is determined to be the donation amount? Why isn&#8217;t the problem the outside groups? Why do we allow lobbyists and PAC&#8217;s to buy our elections? </p>
<p>Get rid of the $516,000 in hateful attack ads and keep the contribution limits for real living and breathing people. If the candidate can&#8217;t raise money from people in their district they deserve to lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2012/11/09/contribution-limits-to-candidates-need-to-be-removed-to-curb-outside-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-78961</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azcapitoltimes.com/?p=53112#comment-78961</guid>
		<description>So basically these candidates aren&#039;t being elected based on their platforms, but how much money they have at their disposal.  We don&#039;t need to change contribution limits; we need to change how elections actually take place, especially the presidency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So basically these candidates aren&#8217;t being elected based on their platforms, but how much money they have at their disposal.  We don&#8217;t need to change contribution limits; we need to change how elections actually take place, especially the presidency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEFFREY J HILL</title>
		<link>http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2012/11/09/contribution-limits-to-candidates-need-to-be-removed-to-curb-outside-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-78891</link>
		<dc:creator>JEFFREY J HILL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 17:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azcapitoltimes.com/?p=53112#comment-78891</guid>
		<description>This comment is spot on.  Truer words have never been spoken.  Allowing more spending will also stop the rich candidate from being able to fund their own campaign, and buy the election.  What about the First Amendment did these regulatory folks miss?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This comment is spot on.  Truer words have never been spoken.  Allowing more spending will also stop the rich candidate from being able to fund their own campaign, and buy the election.  What about the First Amendment did these regulatory folks miss?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
