<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Failed top-two primary measure had most support among independent voters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2013/01/22/failed-top-two-primary-measure-had-most-support-among-independent-voters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2013/01/22/failed-top-two-primary-measure-had-most-support-among-independent-voters/</link>
	<description>Your Inside Track to Arizona Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:08:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Fine</title>
		<link>http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2013/01/22/failed-top-two-primary-measure-had-most-support-among-independent-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-86137</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Fine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 20:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azcapitoltimes.com/?p=55176#comment-86137</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s because several laws need to be changed in Arizona to give Independents a chance to win an election.  The two parties have rigged the system, making it much more difficult for Independents to get on the ballot, as well as placing them at the bottom of the ballot and receiving less Clean Election funding.  I pointed out these disparities in my Nov. 30 Op-Ed in the Capitol Times.  In a few years, Independents will be the largest voting bloc in the state and will start competing based on numbers.  But for now, the law needs to be changed to ensure everyone has a fair chance of getting elected.  It seems like the parties are afraid of competition, particularly when it comes from the growing non-partisan electorate, not the special interests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s because several laws need to be changed in Arizona to give Independents a chance to win an election.  The two parties have rigged the system, making it much more difficult for Independents to get on the ballot, as well as placing them at the bottom of the ballot and receiving less Clean Election funding.  I pointed out these disparities in my Nov. 30 Op-Ed in the Capitol Times.  In a few years, Independents will be the largest voting bloc in the state and will start competing based on numbers.  But for now, the law needs to be changed to ensure everyone has a fair chance of getting elected.  It seems like the parties are afraid of competition, particularly when it comes from the growing non-partisan electorate, not the special interests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Fine</title>
		<link>http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2013/01/22/failed-top-two-primary-measure-had-most-support-among-independent-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-86136</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Fine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azcapitoltimes.com/?p=55176#comment-86136</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s because several laws need to be changed in Arizona to give Independents a chance to win an election.  The two parties have rigged the system, making it much more difficult for Independents to get on the ballot, as well as placing them at the bottom of the ballot and receiving less Clean Election funding.  I pointed out these disparities in my Nov. 30 Op-Ed in the Capitol Times.  In a few years, Independents will be the largest voting bloc in the state and will start competing based on numbers.  But for now, the law needs to be changed to ensure everyone has a fair chance of getting elected.  It seems like the parties are afraid of competition, particularly when it comes from the grass roots, not the special interests</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s because several laws need to be changed in Arizona to give Independents a chance to win an election.  The two parties have rigged the system, making it much more difficult for Independents to get on the ballot, as well as placing them at the bottom of the ballot and receiving less Clean Election funding.  I pointed out these disparities in my Nov. 30 Op-Ed in the Capitol Times.  In a few years, Independents will be the largest voting bloc in the state and will start competing based on numbers.  But for now, the law needs to be changed to ensure everyone has a fair chance of getting elected.  It seems like the parties are afraid of competition, particularly when it comes from the grass roots, not the special interests</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Gratehouse</title>
		<link>http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2013/01/22/failed-top-two-primary-measure-had-most-support-among-independent-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-86131</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Gratehouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azcapitoltimes.com/?p=55176#comment-86131</guid>
		<description>Still waiting for Johnson or any other Prop 121 supporter to identify the radical ideologue elected Democrats in Arizona. 

And why are these sore losers and their failed ballot measure getting attention  this many weeks after the election?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still waiting for Johnson or any other Prop 121 supporter to identify the radical ideologue elected Democrats in Arizona. </p>
<p>And why are these sore losers and their failed ballot measure getting attention  this many weeks after the election?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
