Quantcast
Home / Opinion / Commentary / Affirmative action in school admissions — a net loss for minorities

Affirmative action in school admissions — a net loss for minorities

This month, the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule on affirmative action in school admissions in Fisher v.
University of Texas.
While affirmative action was adopted with the long overdue intention of instituting justice and righting innumerable wrongs, it was poorly designed.

Affirmative action in school admissions leads minorities to do worse in college, discourages minorities from developing valuable skills, and even breeds racism. While affirmative action’s laudable goal is to allow minorities the opportunities that whites take for granted, it is instead a recipe for persistent underachievement.

President Kennedy’s Executive Order 10925 introduced affirmative action by mandating race-blind treatment of employees. Under President Johnson, affirmative action evolved from an attempt to end discriminatory hiring practices into a regime mandating exactly that.

Soon after, the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare began requiring public schools to adopt quotas in school admissions. Since this initial period, the Supreme Court has amended but maintained the use of race in school admissions in a series of decisions. This began in 1978 with Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, in which the court found that using race in school admissions is acceptable, but quotas are not. This decision was reaffirmed in the 2003 case Grutter v. Bollinger. It is therefore reasonable to expect at most piecemeal change in the Fisher case, a cause for worry among minorities.

Rather than resolving social problems rooted in discrimination, affirmative action creates new difficulties. The best way to permanently reduce inequality is to eradicate establishments that maintain the status quo. And affirmative action is part of the status quo — while affirmative action may seem to mollify racial inequities, its unseen consequences damage minorities in more profound ways.

Let us hope the court finds affirmative action unconstitutional in Fisher v. University of Texas. In doing so, the court’s decision may well be the most effective curb of institutionally-mandated racism since Brown v. Board of Education.

— Stephanie Rugolo, an Arizona native who graduated from Arizona State University, is the editor of the online news site, The Rugolo Report.

One comment

  1. Inequality exists and racism is alive and well. If affirmative action is not the answer then what is the alternative? Those who have experienced discrimination in education, in the workplace and in business know first hand what damage and setbacks discrimination causes. Whether it is women, people of color, obesity, disabilities or age. So…legislators what are you prepared to do to resolve it? None of you have yet to come up with how to end inequalities of wages for women, employment discrimination and the gaps in education.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Scroll To Top