Home / courts / Ruling says Ariz. DNA law doesn’t require payments

Ruling says Ariz. DNA law doesn’t require payments

A state court ruling says the Arizona law requiring DNA testing of convicted felons doesn’t permit authorities to make the convicted person pay for the testing.

The ruling by a state Court of Appeals panel overturns a Maricopa County Superior Court judge’s order that a man convicted of drug charges pay for required DNA testing.

The ruling says the lack of a specific provision in the law requiring a convicted person to pay for the testing presumably indicates that legislators did not want to impose that requirement.

The ruling notes that some states have laws authorizing a court or state agency to impose a DNA testing surcharge on convicted felons.

Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


  1. Unfortunately, this ruling will affect only the Plaintiff who filed this lawsuit, and only because he or she was willing to pay more to litigate the issue than will be refunded for the DNA test that the convicted person paid for. The ruling has no retroactive applicability and will only affect those who are ordered to provide DNA sample testing in the future. Furthermore, we can be sure that legislators will correct this “problem” at the first available opportunity by writing and passing legislation which will legally impose a fee to an offender for DNA testing. Meanwhile, for anyone else who wants to recover an already-paid, but illegally imposed fee, they will have to incur court filing fees, process serving fees and other court costs in the hundreds of dollars. This is a pyrhic victory at best.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also

Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., takes his seat before the start of a House Judiciary hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Dec. 7, 2017, on Oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Franks says in a statement that he never physically intimidated, coerced or attempted to have any sexual contact with any member of his congressional staff. Instead, he says, the dispute resulted from a discussion of surrogacy. Franks and his wife have 3-year-old twins who were conceived through surrogacy. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

Trent Franks announces he is resigning immediately after wife is admitted to hospital

Franks said in a written statement his wife became ill Friday and he decided the best thing for his family would be for his resignation to become effective immediately.