Quantcast
Home / courts / Plaintiffs appealing Arizona ruling on smuggling law

Plaintiffs appealing Arizona ruling on smuggling law

In this April 29,2010 file photo showing a drop house that was raided by the Arizona Department of Public Safety along with other law enforcement, yielding nine suspected illegal immigrants, three shown here, and three suspected human smugglers in Phoenix. Federal officials say the number of so-called "drophouses" discovered harboring illegal immigrants in the Phoenix area has decreased significantly over the last four years. They say the decrease is another indication that overall human smuggling activity in Arizona is declining. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin,File)

(AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin,File)

Both sides are now appealing a federal judge’s ruling that Maricopa County’s prosecution of people who arrange to be smuggled conflicts with federal law.

The County Attorney’s Office a week ago said it is appealing the ruling on the state’s human smuggling law, and now the pro-immigrant groups and individuals who’d sued the county over the issue also say they’re appealing.

The plaintiffs’ filing says they’re appealing because the ruling didn’t overturn previous convictions of people who arranged to be smuggled.

U.S. District Judge Robert Broomfield ruled Sept. 27 that the county cannot prosecute people who arrange to be smuggled, but his ruling didn’t apply retroactively to cases already decided.

Copyright 2018 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

3 comments

  1. The ruling should be retroactive. If its wrong to begin with then its time to right the wrongs in this stupid law created by a disgraced and disbarred ex-Maricopa County Attorney. The millions of dollars wasted by the prosecutors driving laws is unconscionable.

  2. correction (missing edit button)

    The ruling should be retroactive. If its wrong to begin with then its time to right the wrongs in this stupid law created by a disgraced and disbarred ex-Maricopa County Attorney. The millions of dollars wasted by the prosecutors driving poorly written laws is unconscionable.

  3. I am trying to understand how Arizona’s smuggling laws conflicted with Federal Law?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 

x

Check Also

Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., takes his seat before the start of a House Judiciary hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Dec. 7, 2017, on Oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Franks says in a statement that he never physically intimidated, coerced or attempted to have any sexual contact with any member of his congressional staff. Instead, he says, the dispute resulted from a discussion of surrogacy. Franks and his wife have 3-year-old twins who were conceived through surrogacy. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

Suits seek to bar 2 Democrats seeking ex-Rep. Franks’ seat

Two of three Democrats running in the special primary election to replace former U.S. Rep. Trent Franks are facing lawsuits challenging their right to appear on the ballot.