Quantcast
Home / Public Safety / Senate panel clears bill blocking government mandates on smart guns

Senate panel clears bill blocking government mandates on smart guns

gun firearm flag620

Calling the technology a method of gun control, a Senate panel voted Wednesday to preclude any mandate that Arizonans have to purchase “smart” guns.

HB 2216 says the state may not require any person to use “electronic firearm tracking technology.”

It also bars disclosure of any disclosure of information gathered from such technology that would identify the gun owner or the person’s firearm.

Rep. Paul Boyer, R-Phoenix, said he heard a presentation at a conference that suggested the best way to regulate who can own and fire a gun is “block chain technology.”

In essence, the technology can sense and log when a smart weapon has been fired, even sending notices to emergency personnel.

It also can send out notifications if an unauthorized person tries to fire the weapon.

“And that’s what I’m concerned about,” Boyer said.

The right to self-defense existed before government, he said.

“It’ll exist long after government is gone. And so every citizen should have the right to defend themselves,” Boyer said.

Beyond the tracking, Boyer said HB 2216 will ensure that Arizonans are not forced to purchase weapons that are designed to fire only by the authorized owner or user. He contends they are “unreliable.”

Various forms of the technology are being developed.

Some involve having the trigger or grip programmed to recognize who is authorized to fire it. Others used radio-frequency chips that the authorized owner would wear to allow the gun to fire, similar to devices that allow cars to start — or not start as the case may be.

“No one’s been able to tell us if you drop the gun (if it will work) with the technology,” Boyer told members of the Senate Government Committee.

And there are other issues, such as what happens in extreme heat or extreme cold, switching hands for holding the gun or even wearing gloves.

“There’s a possibility that it could be hacked so it could be remotely disabled,” Boyer said. “So the point is, when you need it the most that when you should be able to utilize it and not have to worry about whether or not your gun is going to work.”

Boyer said there’s a basis for fears of such a mandate.

A 2002 New Jersey law spells out that only “smart” guns can be sold in that state.

But it is worded to be effective three years after personalized handguns are available on the retail market. And while there are some such weapons offered for sale, New Jersey has yet to declare that the law has been triggered.

Boyer said that New Jersey law — if and when it ever takes effect — exempts police from having to use smart weapons. He said that makes sense and goes to the issue of reliability of the technology.

“Law enforcement needs it at the moment they need it,” Boyer said. “There’s no reason why a private citizen should have this imposed on them as well.”

Dave Kopp of the Arizona Citizens Defense League, a supporter of the measure, pointed out that nothing in the legislation precludes an Arizonan who wants such a weapon from getting one.

The version of the bill approved by the panel on a 4-3 vote does spell out that law enforcement officials can take advantage of a weapon’s tracking technology if they have a search warrant.

It also can be used by pawnbrokers to file reports required by law with the sheriff.

HB 2216, which cleared the House on a 34-25 vote, now goes to the full Senate.

2 comments

  1. Not So Smart After All: Turns Out ‘Smart Guns’ Can Be Hacked – By their computerized nature, any computerized “smart” gun can be rendered inoperable just as the TrackingPoint was in this test, and some smart guns are rumored to have been designed from the ground up to be rendered inoperable with the push of a button by either the manufacturer, or by government itself.

  2. There might be a time when someone, anyone, might wish to “smarten up” one or more of his firearms. Maybe I might. But if so, I reject the proposal that an ignorant hireling of mine (isn’t that what government workers are?) in some cubicle in some department, in some hermetically-sealed, climate-controlled office, in some monolithic office building in Washington usurping my right to make such a decision for myself.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 

x

Check Also

In this Oct. 22, 2015, photo, former Department of Economic Security director Tim Jeffries stands outside his former office, adorned with a "Director J :)" sign. (Photo by Rachel Leingang, Arizona Capitol Times)

State attorneys argue no harm done to ousted DES director

Saying the former director of the Department of Economic Security and the agency's security chief have not been harmed, attorneys for the state are asking a judge to throw out their libel suit.