Home / Opinion / Commentary / Keep Arizona’s growing rural communities whole

Keep Arizona’s growing rural communities whole

For the past four months, the Independent Redistricting Commission has worked to balance the wants, needs and desires of the residents of Arizona. The problem is that Pinal County — Arizona’s fastest growing county — is being used as the bargaining chip to satisfy other constituencies.

There are maps being considered by the IRC that substantially segment Pinal County into two, three or four different congressional districts. This would be a great disservice to the residents of Pinal County, who should be partnered with their similar rural Arizona constituencies to create one Pinal-centric rural district.

Wedged between the juggernaut of Maricopa County and historic Pima County, Pinal County represents a true microcosm of Arizona. Pinal represents a booming growth pattern, enduring agriculture and cattle industries, a revitalized copper industry, a rich Native American presence and a burgeoning tourism climate.

Pinal County is the epicenter of Arizona’s growth and is literally at the forefront of the future of Arizona and the often-referenced Sun Corridor. There is a critical need for leadership and representation that can focus on our issues and those shared by our similar rural neighbors.

I respect the work of our congressional delegation, but the reality is that they often struggle to meet the needs of our less-populated, rural counties. Our delegates invariably come from a large population base within the Phoenix and Tucson metropolitan areas, often to the dismay and detriment of our less-populated rural areas.

Dividing Pinal County into two, three, or four congressional districts would make the metropolitan/rural representation divide even worse. Now, more than ever, Pinal County and rural Arizona need to have the ability to elect leaders who are wholly accountable to rural Arizona.

The IRC has the unique opportunity to keep our rural counties whole and honor the rural heritage of our state. I’m confident Maricopa and Pima counties will have leaders in Washington who are both attentive and accountable. I encourage the IRC to provide Pinal County and rural Arizona the same luxury.

Pinal County’s growth gained Arizona this new congressional seat and we deserve to have our own representation. Keep our rural counties whole and ensure we never forget those traits that make Arizona the treasure that it is.

— Bryan Martyn is the Pinal County supervisor for District 2.

One comment

  1. This is unfortunately just a plea from the rural communities for us to let them increase their powergrab in Arizona. They already have an undemocratic, inflated political influence because they push for more and more prisons (both public & private) to bolster their population numbers, thus giving them undue representation in the legislature. Yes, we have out-of-state residents being counted to draw our Arizona districts — it’s insane.

    New York state realized this was happening to them some time ago and they stepped up and changed the way they counted populations, but the problem has grown far worse here in Arizona than it ever was in NY, yet no one’s talking about it.

    Shame on you, Bryan Martyn.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also


They’re both right and wrong on prosecutors’ ‘Prisoners in Arizona’ report

Ultimately, we will never achieve meaningful sentencing reform in Arizona with both sides bashing the other and making “straw dog” arguments based on false mischaracterization of the other’s positions. Instead, we must take baby steps and then measure results as they inform public safety, in much the same way that the recently released APAAC report undertook its detailed and valuable account of recidivism in all categories of offenses. Knowing which categories of offenders recidivate least often can suggest sentencing reductions that are plausible and realistic.