Home / Opinion / Commentary / State sovereignty bill would strengthen ‘checks and balances’ system

State sovereignty bill would strengthen ‘checks and balances’ system

Sen. Chester Crandell, R-Heber (Cronkite News Service photo)

There has been plenty of misinformation about a resolution I’ve sponsored that is moving through the legislature, and I am trying to clear it up. Senate Concurrent Resolution 1016 would constitutionally allow the people of Arizona to reject a federal action if they determine it violates the United States Constitution. They could do this by passing an initiative or referendum, passing a bill or by using legal action. In addition, the resolution further prohibits the state from using personnel or resources to further enforce a federal action that the people have deemed unconstitutional. SCR 1016 passed out of the Senate and is currently in the House of Representatives. If it clears there, it would likely be sent to you, the voter, in 2014.

Opponents of SCR 1016 claim that this type of legislation causes outsiders to mock the state of Arizona, making it a target for unnecessary and unkind media attention. So now we should consider the late night comedians when determining the best legislation for our state? Well, the people of Arizona aren’t laughing when they suffer the consequences of federal government overreach. If the cost of fighting back is suffering through some punch lines of comedians, I’ll take it.

I believe that SCR 1016 reflects and enhances the system of government in the United States, specifically with regard to the concept of “checks and balances”. We must fight back for the things that we as a state value. SCR 1016 would allow Arizona to reject federal actions that overstep their boundaries and interfere with the Constitutional sovereignty of the state.

In the past other elected officials have taken necessary steps to reject unconstitutional federal actions. The Brady Act, passed in 1993 as an amendment to the Gun Control Act of 1968, imposed a waiting period of up to five days for the purchase of a handgun, and subjected purchasers to a background check during that period. Sheriff Richard Mack of Graham County challenged the Brady Act’s provisions in the local federal district court, explaining that the act imposed duties upon him as a county sheriff. He invoked the Tenth Amendment and the district court ruled that the act did in fact violate the Tenth Amendment by imposing a mandatory duty on sheriffs to conduct background checks.

SCR.1016 expands upon this type of action and it seeks to follow the example of Sheriff Mack, expanding upon his efforts to challenge the federal government. In November of next year, you may be able to join in this challenge by supporting our legislation.

– Sen. Chester Crandell, R-Heber


  1. We need more elected official like Sen. Chester Crandell to introduce legislation like SCR1016. We as citizens need to stand up for our constitutional rights. The constitution gives the feds certain rights and obligations and nothing more. We must stand up and claim our rights or we will be living under a socialist communist country like many others.

    Look at history and read what has happen in other countries, Germany is a very good example.

  2. a unicorn ate my pet pirana now I sad :'(

  3. We support the work of Senator Biggs because he is standing on the right side of this issue. He is fighting to Defend our Constitution and it is his duty to do so!

    We are contacting all of our partners (Oathkeepers, Patriot Coalition, Constitution First, PANDA, Constitution Party, Christian Party, Guardians for Liberty, Tom DeWeese, FIRE Coalition, Publius Huldah, Enforce Our Constitution, Liberty Billboard, Local Heroes, We The People of CT, Fort Wayne Area Tea Party, Institute for Principled Policy, Deborah Stevenson Esq., Christian Party of TX, Patriot Institute, Christian Party of NC, Camp Constitution, Save Our American Republic (SOAR) of LA, Flint Hills Tea Party, John Birch Society-New England, NC Citizens’ Constitutional Caucus, and a few others) to come together in support of Senator Biggs because he is right.

    Please visit our website to watch a video and hear the “convention of states” attorney ADMIT that Biggs is right – it will open up the ENTIRE Constitution for change!
    -The Constitution is NOT the problem and amending it is NOT the solution…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also


Financial accountability should be for all public schools

Accountability of how public tax dollars are spent is an expectation of citizens throughout the state and country. It is very much part of the principles of governance that has separated this country from the rest. The need for an alternative model for public education should not override the public’s concern for how public tax dollars are spent.