Home / agencies / Fugitives, mentally ill able to buy guns in Arizona under outdated records system

Fugitives, mentally ill able to buy guns in Arizona under outdated records system

Arizona’s system for tracking fugitives, accused felons and mentally ill people is rife with loopholes, creating the potential for hundreds of thousands of people who are banned from owning guns to buy them anyway.

Tony Coulson, a consultant working with a task force charged with improving the state’s reporting to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, attributed most of the holes in the state’s reporting system to the lack of technology and the continued use of paper records.

People with arrest warrants, under indictment or mentally ill can buy guns because the state, lacking an adequate digital record-keeping system, doesn’t report them to the federal government’s criminal background check system, Coulson said.

And the holes are glaring. For instance, there are about 500,000 active arrest warrants in Arizona, but only about 30,000 are entered in the background check system, or NICS.

People under indictment or criminal complaint are also prohibited from owning a gun under federal law.  But Arizona does not report those people, mostly because prosecutors aren’t set up to enter information into the various criminal databases from which NICS captures data. There were 33,072 indictments and criminal complaints filed in Maricopa County Superior Court in fiscal year 2012.

“If you are a federally prohibited possessor, you have a very good chance of purchasing a weapon in Arizona,” said Coulson, who was in charge of the Tucson office of the Drug Enforcement Administration before retiring in 2010.

The first attempt at fix will come from the Arizona Supreme Court, which is about to begin design of a repository of mental-health records for use in gun-purchase background checks and by police officers on the street.

Coulson and members of the court’s staff gave a presentation on the state’s reporting system Monday to the Arizona Judicial Council, the administrative arm of the court.

The mental-health repository, which the court plans to have in place by early 2014, will hold court orders for people who have been involuntarily committed, criminal defendants who have been found to be incompetent to stand trial, and mentally incapacitated people who are under guardianship.

Arizona reports people who have been involuntarily committed, or who are a danger to themselves or others.  There are roughly 3,600 of them in NICS, but Coulson estimates that about 30,000 should be.

The state, however, doesn’t report people who have been declared incompetent to stand trial or under guardianship for mental incapacity.

Coulson said it is important to develop the repository first even though people under court order for mental issues make up a small portion of those banned from owning guns.

“People that have mental-health conditions are not predisposed to violence,” Coulson said. “They just happen to be the ones that kill a lot of people at one time.”

The task force works under the auspices of the Arizona Criminal Justice Commission, or ACJC, which got a federal grant in the wake of the Jan. 8, 2011, shooting in Tucson that left six dead and 13 wounded, including former U.S. Rep. Gabriel Giffords. Coulson said the shooting was a major reason the U.S. Department of Justice issued the grant to Arizona.

The shooter, Jared Loughner, was sentenced to life in prison and spared the death penalty because he suffered from schizophrenia.

Jerry Landau, director of government affairs for the Arizona Supreme Court, said the ACJC will take the lead in getting legislation passed to allow for the repository. Landau will write the proposed laws, which are in a preliminary stage and will be revised.

An early draft of the laws calls for the court to manage the repository and provide the Department of Public Safety, the agency in charge of reporting to NICS, with identifying information such as name, age, Social Security number, a court case number and the date of the court order.

Dave Byers, administrative director of the courts, said police on the task force brought up the idea of making the information available to them.

“A police officer stops somebody in a car with a weapon, their behavior is erratic, there is no way they can check to see if that person is declared incompetent or if there is a court-ordered treatment order,” Byers said.

Coulson said there are at least three people in Pima County who were charged with murder, but their cases were dismissed because they were declared incompetent to stand trial.  With no criminal charges to hold someone, the person is set free.

“These folks are on the streets and are able to buy a weapon,” Coulson said.

Landau said he will also have to write new law to allow police access to the repository for the purposes of enforcing a court order, conducting an investigation or returning someone’s gun.

Supreme Court spokeswoman Jennifer Liewer said the court’s staff is still figuring out the cost of the repository.

She said the court has received a $200,000 federal grant through ACJC to fund a study and creation of the repository.


  1. Fix the tracking system, but don’t use this as an excuse to ban gun ownership for the rest of us!

  2. If the Supreme Court thinks it can call the Voting Rights Act outdated, then the AZ legislators need to address this outdated law as well.

  3. So merely the ‘accusation’ of a felony – per Gary Grado – is enough to disqualify someone from owning a firearm? And if enough people with an agenda convince a judge who shares their bias that hoplophobia or pedophelia is not a ‘mental illness’ but that a belief in a G-d having sex with a mortal and producing a son (be his name Hercules or Jesus) is, an entire population loses their rights?

    When this was a civilized republic, children brought their rifles to school, left them in the wardrobe, and there were no school shootings. People bought mail-order, military surplus rifles and handguns from the back pages of magazines, and there were no mass shootings. Armed citizens boarded aircraft regularly, and there were no hijackings or mass murders. ‘Violent crime’, by and large, was the province of ‘organized’ groups, who mostly preyed on each other, or on locations containing large amounts of currency. Citizens who chose to be armed were, and the sight of an openly carried handgun in places like Arizona, Texas, Kansas, Idaho, and a dozen other states was as common as Saguaros in the Sonoran Desert.

    Children were taught to shoot by their parents, along with firearm safety and respect for firearms – and for others. Do something stupid, and you didn’t get to touch the family guns. Walk into a store, and you gave the proprietor a ‘bad feeling’, you couldn’t buy one.

    Like the old joke about when the white man came to this land, there were no taxes, no government, and women did all the work, and we ‘improved’ on that, every time the government has violated its own charter and added ‘laws’ and ‘regulations’ – ‘improving’ on who may own a firearm, when, where and how it may be carried, what caliber and mechanism it may be – not only has there been more violent crime, committed by a broader range of individuals, but entire populations have not only been deprived of their rights, but have become ‘criminals’ by the mere stroke of a pen.

    What Grado has done with this piece is effectively declared that by arbitrarily labeling individuals ineligible to exercise their rights under the Second Amendment, he is unfit to exercise his under the First.

  4. A police officer stops somebody in a car with a weapon, their behavior is erratic, there is no way they can check to see if that person is declared incompetent or if there is a court-ordered treatment order

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also

Former Arizona Corporation Commissioner Gary Pierce, with bottle, and wife Sherry Pierce, both of whom stand accused in a bribery scheme, leave U.S. District Court in Phoenix after their arraignment on June 7, 2017.

Gary Pierce indictment arises from larger FBI investigation (access required)

Defense attorneys for Pierce and his wife, Sherry, filed a motion saying the government wants the court to order that FBI reports, transcripts and recordings of witness interviews, and financial records and tax records of third parties be protected from the eyes of the public.