Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / legislature / Lawmaker, farmers make pitch for $20M for water plan

Lawmaker, farmers make pitch for $20M for water plan

Eloy cotton farmer Tiffany Shedd puts in a plug for the effort by Rep. David Cook, left, to secure $20 million from the state to help Pinal County farmers drill new wells to replace Colorado River water. (Capitol Media Services photo by Howard Fischer)

Eloy cotton farmer Tiffany Shedd puts in a plug for the effort by Rep. David Cook, left, to secure $20 million from the state to help Pinal County farmers drill new wells to replace Colorado River water. (Capitol Media Services photo by Howard Fischer)

Insisting the state made a “commitment,” a Central Arizona lawmaker and farmers he represents is making a last-ditch pitch for $20 million in taxpayer dollars to drill new wells and water delivery canals.

Rep. David Cook, R-Globe, said Thursday the farmers in Pinal County agreed to give up their right to Colorado River water to help the state come up with a plan to deal with the drought. In exchange they were given the right to take additional water out of the ground.

That deal included $9 million from the state to cover the costs. And the farmers through their irrigation districts have come up with another $30 million.

But Cook said the project will exceed $50 million. And while the farmers hope to get the balance from a federal grant, that remains an open question at Congress.

More to the point, he said unless the work begins by the end of the year, the farmers will not meet their goal of getting off Colorado River water by 2023. So the farmers want the state to at least front the $20 million needed – and absorb it if the feds don’t come through.

All that goes to the question of what the Pinal farmers were promised.

In fact, the verbiage in the drought contingency plan was never a mandate on lawmakers to provide the up-front cash. The law says only that “the Legislature may consider appropriations to be made available to the irrigation districts.”

Cook was undeterred.

“I believe it’s a commitment,” he said. “That was my vote.”

And Cook brushed aside the lack of specificity in the funding language, saying it’s obvious that the drought contingency plan was built on Pinal farmers giving up their Colorado River water in exchange for getting access to groundwater – and having the taxpayers pick up part of the tab.

“It’s the entire state that came to Pinal County and said, ‘Can you help us once again put together a plan to conserve water for the entire state,” he said.

Cook also said that the deal doesn’t even cover all the lost river water, with estimates being that farmers will need to fallow about 30 percent of the land they now irrigate.

Anyway, Cook said, it’s not like the farmers are asking for something the state did not give to others. For example, he said the drought contingency plan included $30 million for the Colorado River Indian Tribes to leave some of their allotment of water in Lake Mead.

The difference, however, is that the tribes have a superior water right to the river water and the state could not unilaterally take it from them.

Eloy cotton farmer Tiffany Shedd said the farmers can’t wait until Congress acts on the legislation that would make grant funds available.

“If we don’t have the money now, money from the feds later will be a day late and a dollar short,” she said. And Shedd said the issue should not be seen simply as a Pinal County problem.

“The majority of your beef comes from Pinal County, a huge percentage of your dairy comes from Pinal County,” she said, along with wheat and cotton.

Shedd said farming and affiliated industries is the largest segment of the county’s economy, meaning if they go out of business that will cut into the county’s tax base, curbing the ability to provide basic services. And she said making that up with a tax hike is not a good option.

“We have huge amounts of senior citizens on a fixed income who cannot afford tax raises because we decided to kill our biggest industry,” Shedd said.

In February, the House Appropriations Committee refused to approve legislation to guarantee that $20 million.

A month later, Cook was able to get approval for funding from the Senate Appropriations Committee. But there has been no final approval by either the House or the Senate, and no guarantee that the dollars will be added to the approximately $11.5 billion state budget for the coming fiscal year.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also

Attorney: Ward can’t legally block phone records leading up to insurrection (access required)

State GOP chair Kelli Ward has no legal right to block a U.S. House committee from getting her phone records about her activities leading up to the Jan. 6th insurrection, an attorney for the government is telling a federal judge.