Home / Opinion / Commentary / We need to address root cause of high drug prices

We need to address root cause of high drug prices


There’s no denying that the high cost of prescription drugs is hurting Arizonans. The big drug companies charge Americans the highest prices in the world – twice as much as people in other countries – “for the same drugs, often made in the same place,” as President Trump said in his State of the Union Address. 

After decades of rising prices, the people have had enough. We have seen legislators from both political parties take action in 2019, from the White House to statehouses. We’ve made significant progress, but the fight is far from over and we need to stay focused on solutions that will make a real difference.

Dana Kennedy

Dana Kennedy

AARP is fiercely fighting for lower prescription drug costs, not just for seniors, but for everyone. Our focus is on laws that address the root cause of the problem: the high prices set by pharmaceutical companies themselves. We have pursued new laws that would get generic drugs to market faster, cap out-of-pocket costs for Medicare beneficiaries, and block Big Pharma from raising drug prices faster than the rate of inflation. 

Big Pharma is running scared. They’re spending a record amount on lobbying and they’re busy blaming everyone else for the high drug prices they set. One of their favorite targets is pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs, the companies that negotiate drug prices on behalf of health insurers. The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, or PhRMA, pushed hard for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to enact a PBM rebate rule this year that they claimed would save older Americans money on their prescription drugs.

Let’s be clear on some things. One, there are no angels in the multi-billion-dollar prescription drug supply chain, and AARP has supported drug cost reduction laws in other states where PBM reform is included. Two, well-meaning policymakers and influencers can get caught up when Big Pharma spends millions to deflect and cherry-pick facts. Three, when Big Pharma claims it has a money-saving “reform,” don’t look only at some patients at the pharmacy counter, but also at everyone’s premiums and taxes.

What did independent voices say? The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicted that this PBM reform would raise all seniors’ Part D premiums, cost Medicare nearly $200 billion, and have no impact on drug prices. Medicare’s Office of the Actuary predicted: “The pharmaceutical manufacturers would benefit from the proposed rule overall, even as list prices were reduced.” So the PBM rule mainly would have shifted costs within the system, to the benefit of Big Pharma. Acknowledging that this rule would hurt more than it helped, HHS announced last month that it would not move forward.

AARP has stood up to Big Pharma and insurance companies alike. For example, we have fought for health insurance reform, against the Age Tax (where older people could pay up to five times what younger people pay for insurance), and for pre-existing condition protections. The wellbeing of Americans age 50-plus is our focus.

Meanwhile, Big Pharma self-servingly seeks to preserve the status quo and silence change-makers. Quashing change hurts seniors, everyone who pays into health insurance, and all who pay taxes – since we all bear the costs of today’s system through premiums, out-of-pocket costs, and so on.  

AARP is fighting for change – so far this year, there are 33 new laws across 21 states to help reduce drug costs. The Senate Finance Committee cast a strong bipartisan vote last month in favor of the Prescription Drug Pricing Reduction Act. We are urging the full Senate to pass that bill in the fall, when the House is expected to introduce its own legislation. AARP will not stop fighting until every Arizonan can get the medications they need. If that makes Big Pharma attack us, we will wear it as a badge of honor.

Dana Marie Kennedy is the AARP state director. 


  1. bradley taylor hudson

    There is one sentence in this article that completely describes the “root cause of high drug prices” best. Ms. Kennedy says: “Two, well-meaning policymakers and influencers can get caught up when Big Pharma spends millions to deflect and cherry-pick facts. ” And it is far more insidious than “cherry picking facts”.
    It is buying politicians. Getting “caught up” is a kind way of putting it. Our present political system has been constructed so that money controls politicians and laws. To know what a politician will do, one need not listen to what that politician says or believes, but only look at where he/she gets money. Hve you ever wondered why a law is passed when polls say most people don’t want it, such as the recent tax scam? It is because politicians must satisfy big money donors or they won’t get re-elected. As long as we have a political system that allows big-money, dark-money, and lobbyists to control the process, we will have laws that obviously favor the few at the cost of many, without a rational explanation.

  2. I totally agree and it baffles me why people trust the drug companies when it comes to vaccines even though they know the same crooked companies are the biggest lobby in the United States , who altar their studies to produce outcomes to their benefit.
    Speaking as a person who used to be a pharmaceutical customer for many years and depended on their products because I was convinced and sold on the fact that my auto immune diseases were not reversible, I was raised with that mindset as most people are and have since gotten off everything and living a healthy lifestyle, have not needed any of their products in many years. I think the answer is to teach people that they can be healthy without the use of pharmaceuticals. Pharmaceuticals do not make you healthy. They treat symptoms. The problem is that we are creating a demand on them by promoting an unhealthy lifestyle and then coming to the rescue with their “miracle “products.
    AARP promotes dangerous adult vaccines that are not even recommended or tested on that age group. I deal with both my elderly parents and see firsthand how the industry works with hospitals, nursing homes, insurance companies and drug companies all together to form a cohesive bond and require that their patients are fully loaded with unnecessary pharmaceuticals. So, what I’m saying is that we need to decrease the demand. Promote a healthy lifestyle and not a pharmaceutically dependent one.
    If AARP is NOT on board with lining the pharmaceutical companies pockets, then they should not promote their products, which they do in their newsletters

  3. Ms. Kennedy is right in saying that we need to get to the root of problem, but then she misses it completely. Government interference in the marketplace (yes, by those bought-and-paid-for politicians) is what caused this mess in the first place. Getting those same politicians to pass yet more laws will never solve the problem, they need to be completely removed from the equation.

    As Albert Einstein said, “We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also


Support reasonable liability protections for essential businesses

Given that many businesses operate in multiple states, a federal law would provide much-needed clarity for businesses and consumers alike. And essential businesses like mine deserve reasonable protections from frivolous lawsuits that could put us out of business.