Quantcast
Don't Miss
Home / Election 2012 / Election 2012 News / Arpaio ad accuses challenger of abusing wife

Arpaio ad accuses challenger of abusing wife

Joe Arpaio advertisement

Screenshot from Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio's most recent advertisement.

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has launched a TV commercial that accuses his Democratic rival Paul Penzone of abusing his wife in a 2003 domestic dispute, an allegation that the challenger vigorously denies.

No charges were filed in the dispute.

The ad reiterates allegations made by Paul Penzone’s then-estranged wife that Penzone had caused her to hit her forehead in March 2003 by pushing her on a doorway.

Arpaio’s commercial said Penzone has tried to explain away the allegations, but that there’s no excuse for hitting a woman.

Penzone called a news conference Thursday to deny that he ever struck or pushed his wife, point out that he reported the dispute to police and said that it was his wife who hit him in the head during the dispute with a hockey stick.

The campaign for the Republican sheriff released a statement Thursday saying it stands by the ad.

The dispute came as Penzone went to pick up hockey equipment for his 10-year-old son from Susan Penzone’s house and an argument over visitation of their child ensued.

A report of the dispute by the Glendale Police Department said Paul Penzone suffered a minor bruise on his right cheek and Susan Penzone suffered a minor bruise on her forehead.

Susan Penzone told investigators that it’s possible she could have inadvertently struck Paul Penzone. She didn’t immediately return a call for comment Thursday afternoon.

The report said city prosecutors in Glendale declined to prosecute either person because there were conflicting accounts without any independent witnesses and no reasonable likelihood of winning convictions.

Glendale police spokesman Tracey Breeden confirms Thursday that no criminal charges were filed over the dispute.

Penzone was working as a sergeant for the Phoenix Police Department at the time of the dispute. He has since retired and remarried.

Earlier in the campaign, Penzone ran a commercial that accused Arpaio’s office of refusing to investigate the molestation of a 6-year-old and tried to cast doubt about Arpaio’s reputation for being tough on crime.

Arpaio’s office reopened 432 sex-crimes cases that were inadequately investigated or not investigated at all over a three-year period that ended in 2007.

The sheriff has apologized for the botched investigations and emphasized that his office has taken steps to prevent the problem from happening again.

2 comments

  1. So, arpaio refuses to debate because he may be exposed for all his abuses and for all the money he has wasted of our taxpayer money, but he has a pattern of lying and exaggerating the thruth about his opponents. Is this the best you can do you? Be a freaking man and stand up! Debate! You are nothing but a coward.

  2. It sounds to me like Penzone is the lesser of two evils. I do not care for Arpaio’s arrogant approach to life, but I also don’t like cops who aren’t prosecuted for domestic battery (probably because they’re cops). For the rest of us, a mere accusation is enough to get arrested for domestic battery and the determination of whether a conviction can be won is determined by the DA’s office. Here, the cops decided the latter…that rubs me the wrong way. Despite this, I will definitely be voting for Penzone.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Scroll To Top