Quantcast
Home / agencies / No ironclad proof: Case against Horne is circumstantial, but that may be enough (access required)

No ironclad proof: Case against Horne is circumstantial, but that may be enough (access required)

There isn’t necessarily a smoking gun in the campaign coordination case against Attorney General Tom Horne and Kathleen Winn, but election law experts say the circumstantial evidence against them may be enough.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 

x

Check Also

Man putting a ballot into a voting box - USA

HB2404 could resolve legal questions over pay-per-signature payments (access required)

A bill to ban pay-per-signature payments for Arizona initiatives and referenda could help resolve a long legal battle that has split federal appellate courts across the country.