Pro-life Republicans on a House panel unanimously approved legislation that would restrict abortions, while Democrats walked out of the hearing in protest.
When the Democrats on the Health and Human Services committee left the room, the five Republicans remaining all voted in favor of the bill, H2564. It mandates women be given certain information, in person, about their unborn child and their legal rights if they keep the child.
It also allows a wide range of medical professionals to refuse to provide abortions, allows doctors and nurses to refuse to provide the “morning-after” pill, and changes the regulations for minors getting an abortion without parental consent.
The Democrats said they left the committee hearing to protest the committee’s makeup; with six Republicans — all pro-life — the Democrats said they are essentially shut out from affecting policy.
But House Speaker Kirk Adams said almost every Republican in the House is against abortion and was critical of the protest.
“It sounds like a temper tantrum. The responsible thing is to stay and state your case and vote against the bill,” he said. “That’s the kind of gamesmanship that doesn’t play well with the public or down here.”
Republican lawmakers have pushed for each of those restrictions in recent years, only to have them vetoed by former Gov. Janet Napolitano, a Democrat. But with Republican Jan Brewer taking over as governor after Napolitano joined the Obama administration, abortion opponents are hopeful the restrictions will become law.
Brewer has not said whether she supports the legislation, but in a 2006 survey by the anti-abortion Center for Arizona Policy, she said she opposed abortion except to save the life of the mother.
Month: February 2009
Goddard warns against more budget cuts
Get 24/7 political news coverage and access to events honoring top political professionals
Spat brewing over how much federal money to accept
No strings on some stimulus money
Before the state can receive much of its portion of the $800 billion stimulus package signed into law by President Obama on Feb. 17, the state will have to prove it is adhering to a plethora of requirements laid out in the act.
But some of the stimulus package’s smaller components designed to provide a subsidy for state welfare programs require no effort on the part of the state. According to a preliminary analysis by the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, stimulus dollars provided to the following programs will not be contingent on any action taken by the state:
• The state-run Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which provides low-income families with monthly food subsidies in the form of food stamps, is slated to receive an additional $118.8 million a year, a 13 percent increase to existing funds provided to the state.
• State foster care and adoption programs managed by the Department of Economic Security under state title IV-E are expected to receive an additional $6.3 million for the remainder of fiscal 2009, $8.4 million in fiscal 2010 and $4.2 million in fiscal 2011.
• The state’s appropriation of the Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), which provides meals to low-income individuals through regional food banks, will increase by a total of $1.9 million over the next two fiscal years.
• The Department of Environmental Quality will receive an additional $55 million between October 2008 and December 2010 to pay for clean water programs.
• The Department of Health Services will receive $5 million for vaccines.