Home / courts / Judge rejects pro-marijuana group’s effort to loosen limits for users with PTSD

Judge rejects pro-marijuana group’s effort to loosen limits for users with PTSD

LA judge has rejected efforts by a marijuana advocacy group to quash limits set by the Department of Health Services on how and when patients with post-traumatic stress disorder can legally use the drug.

In a ruling Wednesday, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Crane McClennen, said there was “substantial evidence” to support the restrictions imposed last year by Will Humble, who was state health chief at the time. And McClennen said adopting the views of the Arizona Cannabis Nurses Association that the restrictions are inappropriate restrictions would amount to requiring him to substitute his own judgment for that of the health chief, something he legally cannot do.

But attorney Kenneth Sobel said the judge got it wrong.

“It’s not justice,” he said. “Justice requires that you have independent judiciary that is able to evaluate the behavior of a state agency and determine whether or not they acted in accordance with the law.”

And the losers, he said, will be veterans sufffering from PTSD.

The lawsuit is an outgrowth of the 2010 voter-approved Arizona Medical Marijuana Act, which allows the use of the drug by patients suffering from a list of specific medical conditions, ranging from glaucoma and AIDS to any chronic or debilitating condition that leads to severe and chronic pain.

At last count, more than 76,000 people have qualified to buy up to 2 1/2 ounces of marijuana every two weeks.
The law, however, also requires the health department to consider requests for expanding the list of conditions for which doctors can recommend marijuana.

Humble initially rejected pot use for PTSD.

Last July, however, he changed his mind after finding some scientific evidence that it can help some people with the condition. Humble said there also was anecdotal testimony, including by those diagnosed with PTSD, that smoking the drug helps.

But Humble limited its use to “palliative care,” meaning treating only the symptoms and not the underlying disease.

“I’ve never seen anything that says it’s an effective treatment,” Humble told Capitol Media Services at the time.

Humble also said he would approve marijuana for use only for those who were already being treated for PTSD – even if it was just counseling sessions – before allowing a doctor to conclude that marijuana would be helpful. He said he wanted to be sure that physicians were not promoting marijuana as the first course of action before trying something else.

Sobel said the judge’s ruling effectively singles out veterans for second-class status.

“The only people that now suffer are returning war heroes … who now, unlike every other case (for use of medical marijuana) have to go now and prove that they’re doing traditional medicine for a disease that is incurable and have to prove that in order to safely access medical cannabis,” he said.

There are no similar limits on how and when a doctor can recommend marijuana for those other conditions spelled out in the original 2010 law.

But Humble said that was a decision voters were entitled to make.

He said, though, that the voter-approved law directs him to add new conditions only with evidence that the drug helps that specific condition. And that, Humble said, empowers him to place limits on those additions.

One comment

  1. marc schwabinger

    The finances that this state cost us tax paying citizens to fight these cases is deplorable.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also


Senate to resume Tuesday to vote on House bills

State senators return to the Capitol on Tuesday with the goal of finally finishing out the on-again off-again session that began in January.