Home / legislature / Arizona senators look to revamp lobbying gift ban

Arizona senators look to revamp lobbying gift ban

The cozy relationship between lawmakers and lobbyists could get a little less familiar under a proposed ethics overhaul that seeks to give the public a more detailed look into Arizona politics.

The bill advanced by the Senate’s Judiciary Committee on Monday expands the definition of legal and illegal gifts and would require lobbyists to file monthly expenditure reports detailing any gifts made to lawmakers. The lobbyists would have to state which exemption applied to the legal gifts and list the retail value of the item. They would also have to let lawmakers know the value of the gift. Violators could face felony charges.

Republican Sen. Michele Reagan said she is working with lawmakers, legal officials and lobbyists to ensure some changes are made despite opposition from some legislators and lobbyists who benefit from the status quo.

“I asked them, ‘how much can you stomach?'” Reagan told The Associated Press on Monday.

Reagan said the public is still reeling from a Fiesta Bowl report released in 2011 that disclosed numerous legislators had accepted free trips from the bowl in recent years. Many lawmakers did not list the trips on their financial disclosure reports.

“The public really wants transparency on the interaction between legislators and lobbyists,” Reagan said.

Reagan’s desire to compromise was apparent Monday as lawmakers from both sides of the aisle said the proposed changes were too broad and restrictive. After Democratic and Republican lawmakers complained about a proposed ban on legislators soliciting for charitable organizations during the legislative session, Reagan told the AP that she would submit an amendment to remove that provision, despite it being one of her pet issues.

Critics also complained about the definition of a gift. Lawmakers are able to receive gifts from family under current statute, but the law does not specify that gifts from close friends are legal, complained Republican Sen. Adam Driggs, of Phoenix.

“A gift should be a gift and it shouldn’t even be a question if I get something from my parents or my wife at Christmas, the fact that we have to have a carve out on this concerns me that maybe that gift definition is a little too expansive,” Driggs said. “It should just be common sense.”

Reagan said it was necessary to list exemptions to clarify what is or isn’t legal.

So how far would the ethics revamp go?

It states that a gift is any type of payment, expenditure, donation or property. Family gifts, employer compensation, campaign contributions or gifts received before a candidate is sworn in are excluded under the ban.

Democratic Sen. Steve Gallardo insisted the legislation didn’t go far enough because it didn’t require lawmakers to list specific items on financial disclosure forms.

“The financial disclosure, which we are all required to file, really needs some cleaning up, too,” he said.

Last year, the Senate shot down an ethics overhaul that would have limited free meals, trips and other contributions from lobbyists.

One comment

  1. Keep it simple, NO gifts of any kind for the lawmakers! Make it a felony like the lawmakers create for the people out of every ordinary non-violent activity, then these gifts would evaporate. Arizona’s mandatory minimum sentencing should apply to this fraud and corruption. Time for the lawmakers to serve the people and NOT the special interests who own them.

    And who got punished for the Fiesta Bowl fraud? And how many?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also

Jeff Guldner (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)

Arizona Public Service vows all clean power by 2050

Arizona's largest electric utility said January 22 that it plans to switch to 100% carbon-neutral power generation by 2050, a sharp turnaround from a company that spent tens of millions of dollars two years ago to fight a ballot measure requiring it to use renewable sources.