Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Proposed ballot measures would expand size of Legislature, shorten session

Key Points: 
  • Lawmakers are considering a ballot referral to add 30 new House seats 
  • If approved, the measure would take effect in 2043
  • Proposal aims to address legislators’ concern about district size and representation 

A Republican lawmaker wants to ask voters this November if 30 more members should be added to the Arizona House of Representatives.

The House Government Committee on March 25 passed Senate Concurrent Resolution 1022 5-2, from Sen. J.D. Mesnard, R-Chandler. 

SCR 1022 would increase the number of House seats by 30, increasing the total number of seats to 90 members and giving each of the state’s 30 legislative districts three House seats. 

The measure passed 5-2, although it wouldn’t take effect until 2043 if it makes it to the ballot and voters pass it. 

Arizona formerly had 80 House members and 28 Senate members, but a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that state legislative districts must have roughly an equal population made the state’s legislative district map unconstitutional. The state went to 60 House members for the following election and it’s been unchanged since. 

The average state House size in the country is 110 members. 

“Smaller constituencies are more manageable,” Mesnard said. “The smaller your constituency, the less money influence comes into play — even party influence comes into play.”

Arizona has one of the smallest House rosters in the country. Only Alaska, Delaware, Hawaii and Nevada have fewer state House members. In Arizona​​, each House member represents the second-most people in the country at about 250,000 each, while California state lawmakers represent more people in their districts.

As a legislator in the swing Chandler district of Legislative District 13, Mesnard said it’s more useful for him to raise money for digital advertising to reach more people than it is for him to knock on doors and let residents get to know him face-to-face.

Many rural districts in the state are also very large. Rep. Walt Blackman, R-Snowflake, pointed out that his Legislative District 7 is larger than several U.S. states in the eastern part of the country. LD7 covers Coconino, Gila, Navajo and Pinal counties and is about 35,000 square miles. It is the largest district in Arizona and the second-largest in the U.S.

Many legislators in large Arizona districts find themselves with long drives to get from one end of their district to the other. Rep. John Gillette, R-Kingman, said it takes him four hours to get to the northern part of Legislative District 30 of northwest Arizona from his home and three hours to get to the southern part of the district. LD30 covers La Paz County and parts of Mohave County, Yavapai County and Mohave County. 

“I bought a new truck about five years ago. I have over 200,000 miles on that truck and I’m looking for a buyer,” Blackman said.

Rep. Aaron Marquez, D-Phoenix, said he prefers dividing each House district to keep the 60 members of the House, but decreasing the number of people each member represents. Under that approach, “single-shotting” strategies in competitive legislative districts would end, since members wouldn’t share districts.

“I think that’s also better for democracy,” Marquez said. 

More members would require more desks on the House floor and more offices in the building. Mesnard, a former speaker of the House, said he believes the current building could fit 30 more members, although it would be a little “cozier.”

With an effective date in 2043, lawmakers would have nearly two decades to determine whether the buildings need renovations and how to accommodate 30 additional members. Lawmakers also receive a base salary of $24,000 annually, so it would cost the state $720,000 to pay 30 additional member salaries, not including travel expenses and per diem payments or anticipated increases in staff sizes. 

The Government Committee also passed another Mesnard measure that would move the Legislature’s opening day from the second Monday of January to the fourth Monday of January. That measure, Senate Concurrent Resolution 1025, also passed 5-2.

Mesnard said he thinks a later start date would be better for staff after the holiday break. He also believes it would give lawmakers more time to file bills and actually spend time in initial committee meetings hearing bills. 

Currently, most committees spend the first week of session either not meeting or listening to presentations from state agencies or other groups. 

“There’s like not a whole lot that’s happening down here, if we’re going to be honest. Lots of presentations in committees that may or may not be interesting to just occupy time,” Mesnard said. 

Rep. Stephanie Stahl Hamilton, D-Tucson, said she preferred the earlier start because it helps lawmakers outside of Maricopa County get more time to gather signatures and cosponsors on their bills before the bill filing deadline. 

“It is hard to get here and to get signatures in the offseason,” Stahl Hamilton said. 

Rep. Justin Wilmeth is sponsoring House Concurrent Resolution 2025, which would force the Legislature to end their yearly session by April 30. Lawmakers haven’t adjourned sine die in April since the 2015 legislative session.

Mesnard said his and Wilmeth’s measures should be consolidated into a single measure if they both have enough lawmaker support to get to the ballot. He was not aware of Wilmeth’s measure when he introduced his measure. 

Marquez said he would be concerned about consolidating the measures. It would only give lawmakers 14 weeks to do the people’s business and pass a state budget, unless the governor calls a special session.

“We actually need more time, and maybe more breaks built around holidays,” Marquez said. 

Mesnard said he thinks lawmakers could do their business if there was a deadline of April 30, with the session starting two weeks later. He said that even if the session were longer or had a firm end date, he still thinks lawmakers should start the session in late January. 

Michael Hunter: Politics, policy, passion and process

Before his next role as the chief operations officer at Christian Family Care, former House Chief of Staff Michael Hunter sat down with the Arizona Capitol Times to discuss his career at the House and at the state government level after he stepped down as the House’s top policy adviser on Feb. 14. 

The questions and answers have been lightly edited for style and clarity. 

Can you walk me through how you got your foot in the door for your near 30-year career in government and policy affairs?

I’ve always been attracted to the idea of public policy problem-solving exercises when things don’t work. That attraction got me into being a political science major and I got a graduate degree in political science. My job at Arizona Tax Research, I answered an ad from a Tuesday of the Arizona Republic in the classified ads. This is old school. I circled it, called and got an interview. I think that interest in being helpful is probably why I was attractive to different organizations. I worked at Arizona Tax Research for eight years and was then recruited by the Arizona Board of Regents. They wanted somebody who could speak conservative but advocate for the university system. I then went to the Arizona state Senate, served under two presidents with very different policy objectives and perspectives, [Tim] Bee and [Brenda] Burns. I think I was of interest to Gov. Jan Brewer’s administration because I was the kind of person who could roll up my sleeves and help solve public policy.

What is your approach with policy?

There are lots of words that begin with ‘p’ in our environment. There’s power, there’s politics, there’s policy and there’s passion. But one that gets overlooked is process. If you want to find a really bad public policy outcome, I’ll show you a bad process that led to it. If you’ve got a lot of people with a lot of passion with different power differentials; you know, elected officials in the House of Representatives versus the Senate versus the governor’s office versus the judiciary, how do you bring that energy into some good public policy outcome. We’ve got to define a process that gets you there. I’m a natural advocate for that and to some success, I suppose, in being able to accomplish that.

What is the challenge of managing 60 different personalities in the House?

When a member doesn’t understand another member from another part of the state, I’ll just ask, have you ever gone to that person’s district and gone to a pizza joint on a Saturday night? You’ll find often that the members that come from their districts are a very fair representative of that district. There’s a lot of diversity in different areas of the state. Queen Creek is different from Tempe. So you shouldn’t expect that every member is going to understand each other. I think it’s helpful to have people understand when they’re looking at somebody that they don’t really like or agree with, praying for that person’s well-being is a helpful starting point because it’s hard to dislike somebody when you’re praying for their well-being. I wear my faith on my sleeve so I think of human beings as created in God’s image. If it’s true that people are created in God’s image, they’re worthy of respect. They’re worthy of dignity and, whether I get them or not, isn’t the important thing. Members are going to have this political passion, but I would always tell the staff every opportunity I got, you’re here to serve the members. It says the Arizona House of Representatives on the side of the building, not the Arizona House of Staff. While they can be really intense, it’s not our job to be intense. Our job is to be a force for the integrity of the institution and that means order and process. It means decorum.

Former Speaker Ben Toma often spoke about the process at the House and talked about the excellence of staff. What would you say about House staff and how do you achieve excellence?

They are very talented people. Occasionally, some people join staff where it doesn’t really work out for them. It takes a certain type of person who would want to work at the Arizona House or the state Senate. You kind of fit into a culture there or you don’t. There’re many people who’ve done quite well in their career where the House wasn’t exactly the right fit for them. I’m honored that Speaker Montenegro has made the decisions that he’s made with staff. Speaker Montenegro will be making his decisions about staff and the ones he’s made so far in bringing Matt Specht who was my deputy chief of staff. That’s exactly the right decision. You’re not going to find somebody more knowledgeable about how things run at the House and more dedicated to the job than Matt Specht. My recommendation to the speaker was to keep every single one of them. Keep your department heads. You’ve got the non-partisan offices, the rules office, the clerk’s office, and the research staff who work closely with the committee chairmen. I have a great deal of respect for the leader of the Democrat staff, too. Lisette Flores is a wonderful person.

What makes a good speaker? 

I think servant leadership is the primary thing that makes a good speaker. I’ve been blessed to work for a lot of good speakers. Some of the best in my view, and they know how to tap into the creativity of staff and the energy that staff has. They have a sense of good public policy, but they don’t come in with an oversized agenda of their own. The result of their speakership is channeling the energy of the caucus or of the body into something that moves the public policy needle in the right direction. You certainly have a lot of common interest in generalized things. Republicans certainly are advocates for tax reform; for school choice. But what people mean by those terms can vary a lot. So a speaker is able to channel that energy and turn it into an opportunity to accomplish something. It’s about addition not subtraction; bringing things together rather than sort of tearing things apart in order to build something. I’ve seen people run for speaker where their agenda is to tear the institution down. They’re running for speaker, which is a popularity contest, but they are very critical of the people that they’re trying to gain votes from. The good speakers that get elected speaker, first of all, you’ve demonstrated a skill for pulling together at least a majority of the majority.

Several members have spoken highly of the working relationships they’ve built with you. How important are those relationships to you?

That has been one of the treasures. Thinking about the big policy accomplishments, people will name the tax reforms that I’ve played a role in or school choice or other kinds of things that are a big deal to people. They are a big deal and I am proud of the time I spent working on those issues. But it’s the individual relationships. It’s one-on-one conversations. It’s when a member feels comfortable walking into my office and sharing burdens that they’re feeling or seeking some kind of advice or counsel or just somebody that they can talk to. There’s a reason I keep a tissue box close to my desk because sometimes that’s needed. I have heard from many members how much they value that time that they’ve spent with me just just talking or working through a problem one-on-one or in some small group to the extent that many many members of both parties come in and chat with me. Sometimes they want to pray with me. Whether or not it ends up in explicit prayer, I always believe where two or more are gathered, that God is present. I believe the divine is present in that and so that makes it very special.

What are you most excited for with your next role at Christian Family Care?

There are times when government is trying to figure out how to talk to Christians about the care for family or the care for children or especially children in distress. So what does that look like in our modern culture? That’s the path that my wife and I took when we were waking up to the need to become foster parents. In the same way that I have a desire to strengthen the House of Representatives as an institution, I have a desire to strengthen families as an institution. How do you speak into a modern culture with wisdom and love? Some Christians, they’re speaking into the culture, but it doesn’t sound wise or loving. That’s one of the biggest motivations I have for this opportunity at Christian Family Care. 

Any final thoughts?

Every job I’ve had in the last quarter of a century has been in the same circle more or less. Now I’m in a different circle, but my hope is there’s [such] a strong bridge between these two circles that my friendships remain friendships. There might be some people who want to be a friend of the chief of staff at the Arizona House of Representatives; not necessarily be a friend of Michael Hunter. They want to be a friend of the institution and that’s okay. But I do hope that many of my friendships will transfer to whatever job I’m doing and that I won’t become a stranger at the Arizona Capitol. 

House passes Article V measure to limit congressional terms

The Arizona House of Representatives is calling for a convention of states to amend the U.S. Constitution and add term limits to Congress.

In a narrow and bipartisan vote Wednesday afternoon, the House passed HCR4041 in a 31-28 vote, which would add Arizona to the list of nine state legislatures that have already called for an Article V Convention solely for congressional term limits. The measure must still pass in the Senate. 

A convention of states is an alternative way to amend the U.S. Constitution, although it’s never been done. Constitutional amendments have historically been approved by a two-thirds vote in Congress.

“This is exactly the muscle that we were given as state legislators,” said the sponsor of the measure, House Speaker Steve Montenegro, R-Goodyear. “We cannot be afraid to use it.”

The measure has routinely been introduced in the House in recent previous sessions. In 2023, a similar measure failed on the House floor 26-31. For the first time since this measure has been introduced by lawmakers, it is crossing over to the other chamber. 

Rep. Joe Chaplik, R-Scottsdale, said he doesn’t believe term limits would solve the issues that many have taken with Congress.

“Why not address the real problems that this is targeting,” he said. “Money in politics. Heavy lobbyists. Root out the corruption first.”

While many lawmakers in the House support congressional term limits, several don’t want to impose them through a convention of states out of the unpredictability of how state delegations may amend the Constitution if a convention is ever called. 

Rep. Rachel Keshel, R-Tucson, said she believes there are too many risks of calling a convention of states and is seeking guardrails should one ever be called. 

“There is no way that the nature of men, when given absolute power, will change,” said Rep. Khyl Powell, R-Gilbert, who voted against the measure. “I absolutely do not want to put my liberties or your liberties at risk.” 

The U.S. House of Representatives clerk’s office has tracked more than 160 applications for Article V conventions on various subjects. Two-thirds of state legislatures, or 34 states, are required to call a convention. 

The Arizona legislature passed two measures in 2017 calling for a convention of states to lower federal spending below federal revenue and to limit terms of office for Congress members, although the measure passed Wednesday is a single subject for only term limits. 

Rep. Justin Wilmeth, R-Phoenix, voted for the measure but said he hopes a convention is never actually formed. Because a convention of states has never been called in the history of the nation, Wilmeth said he believes Congress would enact term limits itself before 34 states called for a convention. 

“It’s playing chicken,” Wilmeth said. 

Any proposals to amend the Constitution that come out of a convention of states would still need to be ratified by three-fourths of the states. Several lawmakers who supported the measure said this requirement guarantees that a convention can’t successfully go beyond the reason why states formed it. 

“That’s my real concern,” said Rep. James Taylor, R-Litchfield Park. “They won’t come up with an amendment that 38 states will get behind.”

The term limits measure has been pushed heavily by the organization U.S. Term Limits, which has advocated for similar legislation in state capitals across the country. 

Some lawmakers have spoken out against U.S. Term Limits for alleged attempts to intimidate legislators into supporting the measure. 

Keshel said she was informed by U.S. Term Limits that the organization would campaign against her in her primary race for re-election if she didn’t support the measure in 2023. She didn’t, and she attributed former State Rep. Cory McGarr receiving 5,000 more votes than she did in the August primary election to the organization campaigning against her.

McGarr lost to Rep. Kevin Volk, D-Tucson, in the general election, but Volk voted against the term limits resolution. He said he supports term limits and wants to work on faithful delegate legislation like Keshel has proposed.

Rep. Teresa Martinez, R-Casa Grande, accused the organization of bullying her and her colleagues in 2023 when she didn’t support the measure. She has since supported the measure and voted in support of the measure on Wednesday. 

 

New Faces: Janeen Connolly

Janeen Connolly

One of the new members of the House who will represent Legislative District 8 is Democrat Janeen Connolly from Tempe. Connolly has lived in Tempe for 42 years, according to her campaign website. She’s a first-time candidate and will be serving her first term in the Legislature. Connolly spent 27 years working for Salt River Project as a government relations representative before she retired. She also was an instructor at Arizona State University. Connolly said on her campaign website that her experience at SRP will help her and the relationships she has built over her career at the Legislature. “I had an amazing career at SRP working as a community advocate. This experience helped me gain incredible skills, the most important of which is my ability to talk with all parties and move good solutions forward,” Connolly says on her campaign website. K-12 education, women’s health care, affordable housing and water are some of her primary issues she’s focused on. When LD8 had a legislative vacancy in 2024, Connolly was one of three Democrats nominated by precinct committeemen to fill the vacancy. Connolly didn’t immediately respond to a request for an interview. 

New Faces: Aaron Marquez

Aaron Márquez of Phoenix will be Legislative District 5’s newest House representative. Márquez is an Army veteran who served two deployments in Afghanistan. He said education and reproductive rights are two of his top priorities as he enters office. He is the co-founder of the progressive veterans group VetsForward.us and worked in U.S. Rep. Ruben Gallego’s office in 2015 for veterans outreach.

Representative-elect Aaron Márquez

The committees that interest Márquez are the Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections Committee because of the military component and the Education Committee.

Márquez, a Valley resident throughout his childhood, was elected to the Phoenix Union High School District Governing Board in 2020, and said he was interested in running for the state House because of the control the Legislature has in school funding. He said his political heroes are former U.S. Presidents Barrack Obama, John F. Kennedy, and has found inspiration for public service from Bill Clinton helping start AmeriCorps.

Márquez said working across the aisle is critical at the Legislature and his military experience gives him the confidence to do so. “It doesn’t matter if it’s a Democrat or a Republican standing next to me, we have to find a way to bring each other home and get the mission accomplished,” he said.

Rep. Charles Lucking: From Peace Corps to housing rights attorney to lawmaker

The Democratic caucus in the Arizona House of Representatives has seen seven new members this year following a slew of resignations from elected caucus members. Rep. Charles Lucking, D-Phoenix, was appointed to the House in February and spoke about his experience as an appointee to the Legislature in a recent interview with the Arizona Capitol Times.

The questions and answers have been edited lightly for style and clarity. 

How would you describe your experience at the Legislature?

One of the most interesting things I’ve ever done in my entire life and I’ve done a lot of really interesting things. I served in the Peace Corps. I’ve had jobs where I just went in cold and the drinking from a fire hose thing is not new to me. But this has been one of the most challenging but also just one of the most exhilarating and fun things I’ve ever done in my life. Incredibly difficult, but also very fulfilling.

What made you decide you wanted to seek an appointment?

I am a housing rights attorney, and I was working with Community Legal Services, which is our free, nonprofit law firm here in town. Our eviction laws are ancient and broken. I was thinking well, maybe I’ll run for the Legislature and work on changing our eviction laws in 2026 or 2028. In LD5, both of our representatives resigned their seats. When the second one became available, I’m like, well, I could wait, or I could throw my hat in the ring now and do some work on housing and eviction right now because it’s an emergency. So I gave it a go. There was a point where my legislative district had no representation (in the House).

What was the learning curve like as an appointed representative?

It was crossover week when I was appointed. I know there was one day we voted on like 140 bills. We were there late every single day. It spilled over into the following week, and I really had to figure out quickly how to adequately understand like 100 bills for the next day. One of the things that was different from my expectations was thinking I’ll have the opportunity to read every single bill that I vote on. But if you’re going to be voting on 100 bills or 140 bills in one day, there’s just no physical way anyone could do that. I really had to figure out very quickly what the resources were that I had and what the processes were that other representatives in similar situations were using. I really like being thrown into the deep end and having to learn how to swim really quick. It’s a situation that I’ve grown to love. After a couple weeks, I knew how to be functional and figured it out fairly quickly.

What else was a surprise for you?

The most pleasant surprise was the quantity and quality of resources that we have available to us as legislators, and I’m specifically talking about our policy advisers. We have a team of people who are just absolutely dynamite. If it’s 10 p.m. and you’re reading a bill and you don’t know what the language is really getting at, we have people who are experts on it. They will usually know the answers to any question you have and if not, they will do the digging and do the research to get you the information you need. I didn’t realize that sort of support system existed for legislators. 

What was your favorite moment of the session?

When we repealed the 1864 abortion ban, I was really proud that I was able to play a part in that. I was also really pleased that some of the bills that will alleviate our housing emergency were able to get passed, but there was one thing that didn’t really make any news. It was pretty small but I think ultimately it will end up saving lives. There was a piece of legislation that came before the Military Affairs and Public Safety Committee, and it was essentially a bill that would allow first responders from our neighboring states to cross the border to address emergencies in Arizona. In committee, I voted against it because the language was not dialed in, and I thought that it could potentially be really problematic but I liked the idea. I voiced my thoughts and my concerns with it and then I had several phone calls with the sponsor and the people who were working on it to get the definitions and intent dialed in.

Is this something you would want to do again? 

Absolutely. I just found this work so important because what we do here touches the lives of everybody. I feel like I have the capability of being a really good legislator. I found the work just incredibly interesting and gratifying and I feel like my colleagues value me as well, so I’m going to run again in 2026.

What about the Legislature needs to change?

Everybody knows there’s a lack of communication between the two sides of the aisle that is causing dysfunction in our legislative process. I’m 47. I grew up in Arizona, and it really wasn’t that long ago where Republicans and Democrats would work together to solve big issues. That’s not really happening right now. I think that’s something that’s happening culturally both inside and outside of our political system, but I am making a personal effort to make sure that I’m being communicative and open to all the conversations with people from the other side of the aisle. The only way we’re going to get past this kind of loggerhead is if, individually, all of our legislators and governmental leaders are making that effort on their own behalf, and that our leadership is being a model of overcoming this sort of block that’s happening between the two sides of the political spectrum.

What was it like for you stepping into the shoes of former Reps. Amish Shah and Jennifer Longdon – two Democrats who had relatively successful tenures here?

Both of them were absolutely incredible leaders, not just for our legislative district, but for the state and continue to be in both of their current roles. They have been both great mentors for me and I have an immense amount of respect for them. I never felt like there was an expectation that I would be Dr. Shah or like anything like Dr. Shah. One of the things that’s great about the Legislature is that every single person in there is a very unique individual who comes from a different background. I was delighted by how welcoming everybody in the caucus was and how helpful Dr. Shah and Jen Longdon were. I think what people care about, whether you’re new or not, is that you’re listening to your constituents. I 100% feel that to be a good leader and a good representative, the most important thing is talking to all the different communities that are out there and, certainly Dr. Shah and Rep. Longdon really exemplified that as well.

There was a lot of fuss over how the budget was negotiated this year. What were your takeaways and what did you learn from that experience?

That was really difficult because we’re in just an absolutely massive deficit and as a Democrat, there are a lot of social safety net programs that got caught in a big way. It’s painful for me to see that, but it’s going to be way more painful for the populations of Arizona that are going to feel the direct impact of those budget cuts. Housing is going to see a huge impact on that. Last year was a gigantic surplus and having the contrast between the way the surplus was handled and the deficit was handled was really eye-opening for all of us in the Legislature. My job as a legislator is to make intelligent and informed decisions about the vote to adequately represent the people in my district and the people of Arizona. The cuts being so drastic made it really hard but ultimately, I think we got to the best budget. I voted yes on it, but it was probably the most difficult vote I cast in the whole session.

What housing bills need to run over the next few years?

I have eight eviction bills that I’m writing right now with a few other of my Democrat legislators. I won’t be here to carry them next year, but I have a colleague who will. With eviction, we can make huge changes that are very small and bipartisan bills that are going to have a massive effect on housing insecurity. Those need to be priority number one. Arizona had a little less than 100,000 evictions filed last year, which is about a 20-year high. We don’t have rental assistance funded by the state. Most states have rental assistance in their state budget. Almost every state with the exception of three states has legal services funded by the state budget. We don’t have that in Arizona. Our eviction systems are some of the worst in the nation. It’s an absolute crisis right now. Our Landlord Tenant Act is approaching 50 years old. We are way behind and we need to catch up fast because this is something that is only going to get worse. The biggest immediate change we could make is extending the timeframe because you can go from being late on your rent to out on the street in a very short time in Arizona.

Former Democratic lawmaker gets nod to fill House vacancy

The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors appointed a seventh Democrat to the state House of Representatives since January. 

The board appointed former House Minority Leader Eric Meyer Monday morning to replace former Rep. Laura Terech, who resigned in June to work at the Secretary of State’s Office. The appointment fills a vacancy in Legislative District 4, which covers North Phoenix, Scottsdale and Paradise Valley. 

“I am so excited and honored to be serving the constituents of Legislative District 4,” Meyer said in a Monday news release. “I enjoyed my years of prior service in the House and look forward to responding to the needs of my constituents and to the issues facing all Arizonans. I am humbled to have this opportunity and understand the importance and magnitude of my appointed position.”

Meyer, a medical doctor from Paradise Valley, served in the House from 2009 to 2017 and was minority leader from 2014 to 2016. He was one of three nominees selected by LD4 Democratic precinct committeemen in July to be considered by the board for the appointment to the vacant seat. 

The other two nominees were former state Rep. Kelli Butler and Madison Elementary School District Board member Karen Gresham. Both Butler and Gresham are running for election to the state House this November. 

During the precinct committee meeting when the three nominees were chosen, Meyer said he preferred for Butler or Gresham to get the appointment. 

Maricopa County Supervisor Bill Gates made the motion to appoint Meyer and said while all three candidates were strong, Meyer has experience if the legislature is called into session. 

“I’ve served with Dr. Meyer, seen his commitment to public service in action, and am thrilled to welcome him back to our caucus,” House Minority Leader Lupe Contreras said. “He was an effective and forward-looking leader, and a staunch voice for Arizona’s public schools, our healthcare safety net and our environment. All three of the candidates put forward for consideration – including Kelli Butler and Karen Gresham – were stellar choices. Even if it’s temporary, our caucus and our constituents will benefit with Dr. Meyer back in the fold.”

Since January, the board has appointed seven members to the legislature – all House Democrats. Last year, the board appointed four members to the legislature, and the Pima County Board of Supervisors appointed one member.

“I don’t know if it’s a record number, but we’ve had a lot of appointments to the Arizona legislature that the board has been responsible for, and all my colleagues and I take this responsibility very seriously,” Gates said. 

Terech joins former state Reps. Athena Salman, Amish Shah, Jennifer Longdon, Leezah Sun, Jevin Hodge and Marcelino Quinonez who have resigned in recent memory. She announced shortly after her resignation that she’s working on special projects within the Secretary of State’s Office. 

Terech was one of the instrumental negotiators on a bill during the 2024 legislative session that moved the primary election to July 30 that ensured overseas voters would be able to participate in the general election this year if a recount was triggered. 

Rep. Matt Gress, R-Phoenix, holds the other seat in the district. He and Terech worked on several bipartisan measures together during both their first-terms and spoke complimentary of each other often. 

He said Monday he was looking forward to working with Meyer. 

“Dr. Meyer brings a wealth of experience back to the legislature, having served in the House for eight years. His strong ties to the community and passion for public service will ensure continuity for our constituents through the end of the year,” Gress said. 

House Democrats haven’t announced details for Meyer’s swearing-in ceremony yet. 

Wrap Up with Minority Leader Lupe Contreras

House Minority Leader Lupe Contreras, D-Avondale, rarely saw his caucus at full strength during the 2024 Arizona Legislative session with numerous resignations among House Democrats. Despite that, Democrats saw one...

Get 24/7 political news coverage and access to events honoring top political professionals

Longdon announces resignation from state House

The Democratic caucus in the state House of Representatives will soon be down another member after a Phoenix representative submitted her letter of resignation on Thursday. Rep. Jennifer Longdon, D-Phoenix,...

Get 24/7 political news coverage and access to events honoring top political professionals

Friese plans to resign LD9 House seat

Rep. Randall Friese, D-Tucson, speaks as lawmakers debate among three proposed laws that are designed to deal with distracted driving caused by cellphone use on the...

Get 24/7 political news coverage and access to events honoring top political professionals

Court allows ex-lawmaker’s ouster to stand

Former Rep. Don Shooter makes a point during a speech on the floor of the Arizona State House before the vote to expel him from the...

Get 24/7 political news coverage and access to events honoring top political professionals

You don't have credit card details available. You will be redirected to update payment method page. Click OK to continue.