Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Governor unveils state strategic energy plan

Key Points:
  • Gov. Katie Hobbs rolled out an energy report addressing data center growth, energy demand
  • The report was generated through the “herculean effort” of state energy stakeholders
  • Hobbs urged state leaders to work in a bipartisan manner to secure Arizona’s energy future

Gov. Katie Hobbs’ office is rolling out a state strategic energy plan to address data center growth, skyrocketing energy demand and high utility bills. 

The plan is part of a three-pronged report developed by Hobbs’ Arizona Energy Promise Task force, which she created via executive order in September. The 36-member group developed 31 recommendations covering myriad energy topics in what one task force member called a “herculean effort.”

Hobbs’ Office of Resiliency, led by Director Maren Mahoney, helped the task force develop the recommendations through five working groups composed of members from the private sector, state utility companies, state agencies, nonprofit organizations, universities, and more. 

The governor told reporters after an April 2 task force meeting that the work is only just beginning, but bringing together stakeholders who typically do not agree to find common ground was no small feat. 

“I’ve never heard so many people so excited about being involved in a government task force before, but I think it’s because there is the acknowledgment that we have this really big issue of needing to plan strategically for our energy future,” Hobbs said.

Some of the task force’s recommendations are likely to be rolled out sooner rather than later, according to Mahoney. There is already interest from stakeholders in creating a statewide energy efficiency campaign as outlined in the report, which could help Arizonans weatherize their homes and upgrade old appliances for energy bill savings.

But Hobbs also acknowledged that many of the recommendations will require support and decision-making efforts from the all-Republican Arizona Corporation Commission and the Republican-controlled Legislature. Despite the anticipated opposition, she said she is confident state leaders can put aside political differences to advance the task force’s recommendations.

“(It’s) about doing what’s best for Arizona, not what’s going to benefit a political party or not,” Hobbs said. “I think we’ve shown on big issues like Ag-to-Urban, like the Diamondbacks and Axon, we can work together to do what’s right for Arizona.”

State strategic energy plan

The report outlines five energy challenges the state is currently facing: load growth, supply chain constraints, federal policy changes, extreme weather and climate change, and water use implications. The recommendations offer both near-term and long-range strategies for addressing those challenges. 

Most notably, a majority of the task force’s recommendations for the state strategic energy plan revolve around transitioning the state to renewable energy sources and away from coal and natural gas. That push may come against the ACC and Republicans in the Legislature, who remain largely supportive of President Donald Trump’s initiatives to reinvigorate the coal industry and move away from solar and wind. 

The task force recommends supporting the conversion of coal plants, increasing deployment of distributed solar projects, encouraging the development of utility-scale wind and solar projects and encouraging the adoption of “low-carbon, water-use firm” technologies. 

Hobbs said the state is ready to grant permits for renewable energy projects on state land, while the Trump administration is rejecting them on federal land. But she said the state is not in a position to fully transition away from natural gas affordably, as it is currently Arizona’s largest source of energy.

“We are not in a position where we can pick winners and losers in the energy space. We have to have an all of the above approach,” Hobbs said. 

The governor also acknowledged that many of the task force’s recommendations fall within the ACC’s regulatory and ratemaking authority. One of the commission’s staff attorneys served as a task force member and Commissioner Rene Lopez served on the task force’s nuclear working group.

“The Corporation Commission is a very important aspect of all of this,” Hobbs said. “You saw them represented in the room, and I think we’ve provided some, I don’t want to say direction, but like here’s what you can take and do.”

Framework for large load growth

The task force also developed six recommendations for addressing large load growth customers like data centers and semiconductor manufacturers. Arizona is becoming a hub for both, which increases demand on the state’s energy grid and water resources.

Two of the task force’s recommendations focus on recent community backlash to data center projects. One includes requiring or incentivizing data center developers to proactively engage with communities and invest in community priorities, while another urges collaboration with local governments to inform the public about potential projects. 

“Across the United States, a lack of transparency and clear communication about large load customers and their impacts on the energy system has contributed to public concern and opposition,” the report states.

With many Arizonans concerned about data center costs being passed on to them in their utility bills, the task force recommended exploration of bring-your-own-capacity programs. BYOC programs allow data center companies to pay utility customers for the excess energy generated by their rooftop solar panels or electric vehicle batteries, a concept known as virtual power plants. 

The report also recommends revisiting the state’s tax incentives for data center projects, although the Data Center Coalition, Microsoft and Google each objected to that recommendation. Hobbs also proposed repealing the data center tax incentive in her executive budget, but the Legislature seems relatively uninterested in getting rid of the incentive. 

Advanced energy sources

The task force also explored how emerging energy resources could be used to help meet increased demand for energy. It created eight recommendations regarding preliminary steps the state could take to advance the development of geothermal and nuclear energy. 

Twenty-seven percent of the state’s energy portfolio is nuclear — all of which comes from the APS Palo Verde Generating Station. 

The task force recommended identifying potential state tax incentives, investments and grants to help reduce the costs to build new nuclear energy projects, while also streamlining environmental review and permitting processes to accelerate development. 

However, the Arizona Public Interest Research Group disagreed with the two nuclear recommendations.

“Despite numerous attempts across the country, nuclear energy has not been able to provide finance certainty nor proven affordable for ratepayers,” the public interest group wrote in the report. 

Hobbs acknowledged the cost and environmental concerns related to the deployment of advanced nuclear technologies to reporters, but said it is important for the state to stay at the table. 

“The federal government is looking to accelerate more nuclear energy and obviously there’s safety concerns, environmental concerns that we have to make sure that we’re attending to, but we’re absolutely making sure that Arizona is a part of those conversations,” Hobbs said.

The report also outlined several recommendations for advancing the development of geothermal energy resources, a currently unutilized source in Arizona. Those recommendations primarily focus on research efforts to better understand how geothermal could be deployed in the state and barriers to entry. 

Overall, the governor, her staff and the task force members emphasized the release of the report is only the beginning of the conversation.

“We’re not all going to agree, we all did not agree, but I think the process itself has been really, really, incredibly valuable,” Mahoney of Hobbs’ Office of Resiliency, told the task force. “… This is not the end. This is the beginning of our implementation process.”

New nuclear projects see bipartisan support in Arizona

Key Points:
  • Arizona leaders express support for new nuclear energy projects
  • Corporation Commission hopes to see development by 2035
  • High costs and “NIMBYism” could delay nuclear deployment

There appears to be broad, bipartisan support for new nuclear energy projects in Arizona as demand on the state’s energy grid continues to grow. 

Arizona elected officials from both parties and from multiple areas of government expressed interest in expanding the state’s energy portfolio to include more nuclear energy at an Arizona Corporation Commission workshop on Feb. 24. 

“I’m happy to see the bipartisanship of taking nuclear off the shelf and putting it back on the table as an option,” said Commissioner Rene Lopez, who initiated the workshop. 

The commission opened a docket in 2025 to explore advantages and barriers to developing new nuclear energy in Arizona. The latest workshop  marked the commission’s second on the topic. The meeting focused on financing for new projects, with presentations on potential costs, state and federal tax incentives, and grant funding. 

Representatives from the offices of Gov. Katie Hobbs, U.S. Sens. Ruben Gallego and Mark Kelly and U.S. Rep. David Schweikert gave presentations to the commission on their efforts to bolster nuclear energy in Arizona by cutting red tape at the state and federal levels. 

Additionally, State Rep. James Taylor, R-Litchfield Park, outlined the Legislature’s appetite for legislation that can clear the way for more nuclear projects, while Apache County Supervisor Nelson Davis and St. Johns Mayor Spence Udall spoke about how those projects could benefit their communities. 

Currently, the state is home to one nuclear power plant: Palo Verde Generating Station. Palo Verde came online in the late 1980s, but Arizona stopped pursuing other nuclear projects as the energy source fell out of favor across the country.

Now, the ACC is hoping to bring advanced nuclear power generation to Arizona by 2035. ACC commissioners and Arizona utility companies say they’re seeing increased support for new nuclear projects from ratepayers. 

“We do hear from Arizonans all the time that they want nuclear and they don’t know why it’s not here right now,” Commissioner Rachel Walden said during the workshop. 

Hobbs’ office is in the process of developing a statewide energy strategy plan through her Arizona Energy Promise Task Force. Maren Mahoney, director of the governor’s Office of Resiliency, told commissioners that the plan will include exploration of opportunities to take advantage of technologies like advanced nuclear generation.

Mahoney said the Governor’s Office is currently focused on workforce development opportunities to help power the construction of potential nuclear projects.

“We know there are opportunities to advance a nuclear energy workforce, and that needs to be done sooner rather than later, so that they’re ready once shovels hit the ground,” Mahoney told commissioners. 

Hobbs’ office is also committed to serving as a “conduit” to bring together various federal, state, utility and private sector partners to streamline construction and deployment of new nuclear projects, Mahoney said. 

Arizona’s three major utility companies, Arizona Public Service, Salt River Project and Tucson Electric Power, are in the very early stages of developing a small modular nuclear reactor. The companies have applied for a U.S. Department of Energy grant that would assist in obtaining an early site permit for the project and are doing “initial project planning” with plans to begin a siting study this year. 

Meanwhile, Republicans in the Arizona Legislature are eager to remove potential roadblocks to advanced nuclear generation like Small Modular Reactors, known as SMRs. Lawmakers have introduced six SMR bills this session, the majority of which focus on removing zoning hurdles for potential nuclear projects.

“There’s opportunities and potentials for pitfalls and roadblocks that we want to try and identify ahead of time and remove before we get there,” Taylor told lawmakers.

Representatives from APS, SRP and TEP said no legislation is immediately necessary to spur development, but any policies aimed at de-risking investments in nuclear energy would be welcome. Currently, nuclear projects can cost anywhere from $5 to $10 billion, making them unlikely investments for utility companies looking to keep bills affordable for customers. 

Companies like Google, Microsoft, Amazon and Meta are interested in investing in advanced nuclear generation to power operations that require an immense amount of energy, like data centers. Those private-sector investments could help alleviate the demand that data centers are placing on Arizona’s energy grid without passing costs on to residential customers. 

However, aside from the high cost of nuclear projects, almost every stakeholder involved in the Feb. 24 meeting acknowledged that the “Not In My Backyard” or NIMBY philosophy is the greatest hurdle for development. 

“I think one of the challenges every state faces is NIMBYism,” Commissioner Lea Marquez Peterson said. “Nobody wants anything in their backyard, whether it’s transmission or utility-scale solar or a nuclear power plant. So how we propose this and educate the public is key.”

Whether Arizona sees a new nuclear energy project in development by 2035 depends on who you ask. While the ACC, lawmakers and even the Governor’s Office are eager to pursue the opportunity, Arizona’s utility companies are currently focused on lower cost natural gas plants. 

In the meantime, the commission will continue to hold workshops on nuclear generation, with a third workshop focused on workforce development and community outreach. 

Republicans look to speed up small modular nuclear reactor construction in Arizona

Key Points:
  • GOP lawmakers introduce six bills to accelerate small modular nuclear reactor development
  • The bills preempt county governments from prohibiting SMR construction 
  • Opponents argue SMRs will not be ready for deployment in Arizona anytime soon

Republican lawmakers hope to clear the path for new nuclear energy technology in Arizona, while opponents argue it is too soon to expect that technology to come online. 

Six bills aimed at making it easier to construct small modular nuclear reactors, known as SMRs, have been introduced this session as buzz around the alternative to large nuclear plants grows. The bills focus on prohibiting counties from banning the construction or operation of SMRs and making it easier for data centers to build SMRs to power their operations. 

“The future is here, A.I. is here, data centers are here,” said Rep. Justin Wilmeth during a Feb. 12 committee hearing. “We need more energy, and I think (SMRs are) a great approach to be more flexible and create more energy options in the future.”

SMRs are about one-third the size of traditional nuclear reactors and can produce 50 to 300 megawatts of power. According to Stanford University’s Precourt Institute for Energy, 300 megawatts can power around 300,000 homes.

Only two SMRs are operational currently, one in Russia and one in China. However, 74 SMR projects are currently under development worldwide, according to Stanford. 

Wilmeth, a Republican from Phoenix, introduced two bills aimed at accelerating SMR construction. One requires counties to allow data centers and other large industrial energy users to co-locate with SMRs and another requires counties to include land use planning for SMRs in their comprehensive plans. 

Rep. Michael Carbone, R-Buckeye, and Sen. Frank Carroll, R-Sun City West, introduced their own bills with similar provisions to Wilmeth’s proposals. Carroll’s proposal would also allow electric utility companies to replace coal or natural gas generating units with SMRs or to co-locate an SMR with a data center without additional environmental review.

Another bill from Rep. James Taylor, R-Litchfield Park, would require counties to approve the construction and operation of any facility manufacturing SMRs or the supplies needed to construct an SMR. Meanwhile, Rep. Teresa Martinez, R-Casa Grande, is sponsoring a bill that would direct the Arizona Commerce Authority to conduct a study on the economic benefits of SMRs and data centers in the state. 

Arizona Corporation Commission Chairman Nick Myers opened a nuclear energy docket at the commission last year to generate conversations about SMR deployment in the state. He said he supports the Legislature’s efforts to tackle regulations that could slow deployment, but is cautious about utility-built SMRs.

“Arizona really doesn’t want to be on the cutting edge of nuclear, because then all of the (research and development) costs tend to get put back on to the ratepayers of the utilities, and we don’t want that,” Myers said. “So being fourth, fifth, sixth in line is really where we’re aiming for from a utility standpoint.”

Myers said he is supportive of allowing data center operators to construct their own SMRs because the operators would front all of those research, development and construction costs. 

Arizona’s utility companies are interested in building SMRs as demand on the state’s energy grid continues to increase, but actual deployment of those projects is likely far off. According to a letter filed with the Arizona Corporation Commission in December, Arizona’s three major electric utilities — Arizona Public Service, Salt River Project and Tucson Electric Power — are in the very early stages of exploring SMR construction.

The three utilities have submitted a grant application to the U.S. Department of Energy to finance the pursuit of an early site permit from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The companies have not yet identified any specific sites or any specific SMR manufacturers to facilitate a potential project. 

However, opponents of nuclear energy argue SMRs are expensive, experimental and hazardous to the environment. Additionally, the County Supervisors Association opposes many of the SMR bills because they impose restrictions on county governments. 

Sandy Bahr, director of the Sierra Club’s Grand Canyon chapter, said lawmakers should focus on removing regulatory barriers from solar and wind before paving the way for SMRs because those energy sources are currently deployable.

“They’re spending all this time on legislation on something that is not ready for prime time,” Bahr said.

Gov. Katie Hobbs echoed that sentiment in a veto letter for a 2025 bill from Carbone that mirrors the bill he introduced this session.

“Unfortunately, this bill puts the cart before the horse by providing broad exemptions for a technology that has yet to be commercially operationalized anywhere in the nation,” Hobbs wrote on April 18, 2025. 

Nearly all of this session’s SMR bills have passed out of committee, and those preempting county authority are likely to face the governor’s veto pen. But vetoes will not stop SMRs from being deployed in Arizona, which some advocates say could happen in the next three to eight years. 

Clean energy ballot measure could close nuclear plant

These structures store spent fuel. Officials say Palo Verde has enough space to store used fuel indefinitely while the federal government decides where to place a...

Get 24/7 political news coverage and access to events honoring top political professionals

Utility regulator wants nuclear energy to count as renewable

An Arizona utility regulator has suggested that nuclear energy should count as a renewable power source, allowing it to compete with solar and wind. Environmental advocates don’t generally consider nuclear...

Get 24/7 political news coverage and access to events honoring top political professionals

Last nuclear power plant in California to close by 2025

The rooftop panels and churning turbines of booming solar and wind energy are helping make U.S. nuclear power plants, with all the safety fears and rising costs they bring, obsolete,...

Get 24/7 political news coverage and access to events honoring top political professionals

Going nuclear? 

For Arizona politicians, the easy part of plunging back into the nuclear-energy business is well under way – the talking part. Now come the details, which include such hurdles as...

Get 24/7 political news coverage and access to events honoring top political professionals

Brewer aims to keep AZ part of Western Climate Initiative 

Gov. Jan Brewer (file photo)
Gov. Jan Brewer has issued an executive order that aims to continue Arizona’s participation in a multi-state agreement to reduce greenhouse...

Get 24/7 political news coverage and access to events honoring top political professionals

Sen. Melvin focuses on nuclear power at panel hearing

As the energy debate heats up in the nation’s capital, policymakers in Arizona have begun asking questions about the implications of cap-and-trade legislation and other climate initiatives for the state....

Get 24/7 political news coverage and access to events honoring top political professionals

Nuclear energy production leaves carbon footprint, plus more

Arizona Capitol Times Reporter Anjanette Riley stumbled into the common fallacy that nuclear energy production involves no carbon emissions (‘Green’ energy debate over nuclear vs. solar heats up, June 5)....

Get 24/7 political news coverage and access to events honoring top political professionals

You don't have credit card details available. You will be redirected to update payment method page. Click OK to continue.