Home / Election 2012 / Election 2012 News / Corporation Commission / Dem Corporation Commission candidates question Republicans’ commitment to solar energy

Dem Corporation Commission candidates question Republicans’ commitment to solar energy

Dem Corporation Commission candidates question Republicans’ commitment to solar energyThe three Democratic candidates for the Arizona Corporation Commission warned voters Thursday that if their Republican opponents portray themselves as backing solar energy, don’t believe it.

If Arizonans want a Corporation Commission dedicated to expanding the role of solar power in the state, they argued, Democratic incumbent commissioners Sandra Kennedy and Paul Newman and Democratic challenger Marcia Busching must be elected.

“Some folks are talking the talk, but not walking the walk,” Kennedy said at a press conference Oct. 25. “Don’t believe the Republican candidates. They do not have the track record of being the solar team or the solar advocates.”

The Democrats’ assertion comes as the Republican commissioners tout solar energy achievements made by the state, while the commission has been under 3-2 Republican control over the past four years.

The Republicans have maintained that they offer a more moderate, measured approach to implementing solar power. Their approach, the Republicans argue, will provide more stable energy prices while working toward the state’s mandated goal of having 15 percent of Arizona’s energy produced by renewable sources.

The Republican candidates are incumbent commissioner Bob Stump, Bob Burns, a former state lawmaker and Susan Bitter Smith, former president of the Central Arizona Project and former vice mayor of Scottsdale. They say the state is moving toward the renewable energy standard goal and that trying to expand it would lead to energy market volatility.

“Arizona already has a solar industry – a thriving one,” Stump said. He is quick to cite statistics that show positive growth of solar energy in Arizona: The state is first in rooftop solar in the Southwest, it has added more residential solar in 2012 than in the past three years combined, solar installations increased 333 percent between 2010 and 2011 and the world’s largest concentrated solar plan in the world is being built outside Yuma, among other achievements.

“The Republican majority has helped more Arizonans procure more solar, at a lower cost, than any commission in Arizona history, while protecting ratepayers,” Stump said.

But while the Democrats laud some of those same statistics, they argue that the Republicans want to achieve only the 15 percent mandate, and nothing more, while solar prices continue to come down. The Democrats say that because solar energy production costs are now near parity with natural gas, the 15 percent benchmark should be reevaluated and expanded.

The Democratic candidates declined to say exactly what a new renewable energy standard goal should be, but that experts should be brought in to research the topic.

“You also have polling that shows Arizonans are willing to pay more for renewable,” Newman said, acknowledging there is some cost to transitioning toward solar energy.

The arguments are nothing new in the race to control the state commission that regulates energy. The partisan divide, wherein the Democrats say they want to expand the renewable energy goals and the Republicans say they want to maintain its current goals, has been consistent throughout the race.

The Democratic candidates brought a new sense of urgency as the election draws near, and they complained that the media has not paid enough attention to the race, nor have the issues been properly covered, they said.

“It’s frustrating the amount of coverage we’re getting – or not getting I should say,” Newman said. “It could just be that we’re the forgotten branch of government, but I think this is a tipping point election.”


  1. Stump’s claim that Republicans have done more on solar than any other Commission in history is a hollow comparison: They were majority on the ONLY session that has done ANYTHING on solar… That means they were also the WORST IN HISTORY at bringing solar to Arizona.

    It’s like saying “Evan Mecham was the best used car dealer turned impeached governor in Arizona history.” You really can’t say you were the “best” if you were the “only.”

    Republicans been a lot less solar-friendly than our neighboring regulators in California, Nevada, Utah, Colorado and New Mexico. Heck, even New Jersey is pushing harder for solar than Stump and the Republicans!

    If they’d listened to Arizonans and to the Democrats on the commission, they might have done a lot more to forward energy independence in Arizona.

  2. New Plant Electricity Cost – Natural Gas versus Coal, Nuclear, Wind, Solar


    Check the Chart for easy visual comparison. Data as of late spring–Nat. gas $.05/KwH and solar $.20/KwH. This is not to mention that solar can not produce the base load necessary to sustain a thriving economy unless you want to cover the area of the state of Maryland each year just to keep with increased demand. As is always the case, Mr. Stump is spot on. If the sun worshipers of the left get in, might as well put up signs at the state line telling commerce they can’t afford to do business in AZ. That would be disaster!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also

APS solar cover companies

Rooftop solar industry, consumer watchdog offer deal to APS (access required)

The group representing Arizona’s rooftop solar industry has agreed with the state’s utility consumer advocacy office to offer a scaled-back and more stringently regulated plan for Arizona Public Service to get into the rooftop solar business.

/* code for tag simpli.fi */