Ducey declares victory on Prop 123 after vote margin widens

Ducey declares victory on Prop 123 after vote margin widens


Ahead by nearly 16,800 votes and with ever-widening lead, it now appears Proposition 123 has been approved.

Figures as of late Thursday shows 520,425 votes in support of the measure to boost school funding, with 503,659 against.

The largest share of votes to be tallied is in Maricopa County with 15,400 early ballots and about 1,270 provisional ballots where the registration needs to be verified. But given the trend of votes counted in the last 24 hours, there may not be enough uncounted ballots out there to make a difference.

Gov. Doug Ducey who put together the deal that went to voters, used that margin to declare victory.

“The votes have been counted and the result is clear,” he said in a prepared statement. And the governor noted that the package should put to rest a lawsuit filed by schools against the state six years ago for ignoring a voter mandate to boost aid to education annually to account for inflation.

“After years of lawsuits and fighting, we are moving forward and funding our teachers, students and schools instead of lawyers,” he said.

Ducey, who promised all throughout the campaign that Proposition 123 was just a “first step” in boosting school funding, sidestepped questions Thursday night about what comes next.

“We’re going to take the rest of the day off,” he said. “We’re going to celebrate a little bit.”

He said, though, that the coalition of business, legislative and education interests that negotiated the plan and pushed it through will remain intact.

“And we’re going to talk about how we continue to improve,” the governor said.

Despite Ducey’s declaration of victors, state Treasurer Jeff DeWit, the highest-profile opponent of the school financing plan, said he’s not ready to concede.

“With a vote this close still, it is important to wait until all the votes are counted,” he said Thursday evening.

Even presuming the victory holds, the measure still has a significant legal hurdle.

On Wednesday, a Phoenix man asked a federal judge to block the change in withdrawals from the state land trust that Proposition 123 is designed to permit.

Michael Pierce contends that simply amending the Arizona Constitution, as the ballot measure does, is insufficient to allow the state to take an extra $2.2 billion from the education trust account over the next decade. That is the prime source of funds for the $3.5 billion settlement to end the lawsuit filed by schools against the state.

Pierce contends that can happen only if Congress agrees to amend the law that gave Arizona 10 million acres of federal land in 1912 when it became a state. And because that did not happen, he is arguing, the change that voters may have approved on Tuesday cannot take place.

Pierce’s lawsuit mirrors the arguments DeWit made to a legislative committee late last year. He said any attempt to divert more dollars from the trust needs congressional approval.

The governor responded by bringing out former Congressman John Shadegg to refuse those arguments.

Shadegg cited an amendment to the 1912 law in 1999. He said that is broad enough to allow Arizona voters, by amending the state Constitution, to decide how they want to spend the trust.

In fact, Shadegg told lawmakers that he reads that 1999 amendment to allow voters to drain the entire trust if they want.

DeWit responded by commissioning a legal opinion from attorney David Cantelme. He concluded that the change in the distribution formula, even if approved by voters, “cannot go into effect unless and until approved by Congress as well.”

On Thursday, DeWit said he is unfamiliar with Pierce and had nothing to do with filing the lawsuit. But the treasurer declined to say what legal action he is planning if the final vote shows Proposition 123 is approved and Gov. Doug Ducey directs him to take the additional dollars out of the trust.

Pierce, for his part, said he wasn’t spurred on by anyone. But he acknowledged being opposed to the ballot measure.

If approved it would provide $3.5 billion in additional dollars to schools through 2025. Approval also would end a lawsuit filed by schools in 2010 when state lawmakers, in a budget-balancing maneuver, ignored a voter-approved mandate to boost aid to education annually to account for inflation.

But the key is being able to take that extra $2.2 billion of that from the trust which consists of the proceeds from the sale and lease of state lands set aside for education.

Pierce said he reads the federal law as allowing the state to tap only the interest from the trust, leaving the principal alone.

Under the current formula designed to smooth out the distribution, schools currently get 2.5 percent of the value of the trust every year. This change boosts that to 6.9 percent for the next 10 years.

Legislative budget staffers said the education fund, now worth about $4.8 billion, would grow automatically to $9 billion by 2025. But with the additional withdrawals, the account is projected to be $6.2 billion instead.

Pierce, who is representing himself, said he’s not against more funding for schools.

“But I believe we should fund it soundly and credibly and by the rules,” he said. Pierce said that means getting specific congressional approval “and then submitting it to the people in a referendum.”

State schools chief Diane Douglas, who took no position on the ballot measure, noted Thursday night that the nothing in the language of the ballot measure spells out where schools need the money. But Douglas said she hopes school boards and administrators “will do everything they can to ensure that this money gets to our classrooms either in the form of salary increases or classroom size reduction.”