Quantcast
Home / AZ/DC / Senate takes up, then blocks, competing gun-control measures

Senate takes up, then blocks, competing gun-control measures

GunsCampus620

WASHINGTON – The Senate had the opportunity to act on competing gun-control measures Monday, but proceeded instead to block action on any of the proposals in votes that fell mostly along party lines.

The votes came just eight days after the shooting at an Orlando nightclub left 49 club-goers dead and 53 injured at the hands of a gunman who claimed allegiance to ISIS. The shooter was later killed by police.

A Senate filibuster late last week opened the door to Monday’s vote on four competing gun measures – two by Democrats and two by Republicans – that were proposed as amendments to the Commerce budget bill.

But in procedural votes Monday evening that would have allowed the amendments to come up for a vote, each party blocked a vote on the other’s measures. Arizona Republican Sens. Jeff Flake and John McCain followed suit, voting with most of their fellow Republicans against the Democratic measures and for the GOP-backed amendments.

In a statement released by his office, McCain said that he voted for the Republican measures because they would have kept guns out of the hands of terrorists “in a way that is both effective and constitutional.” He blamed the Democrats for obstructionism.

“I’m disappointed that instead of working with Republicans to address these issues in a way that respects Americans’ constitutional rights, Senate Democrats have opted for political grandstanding,” McCain’s statement said.

But Democrats said the Republican proposals would have done little to curb violence – and in some cases may have made it easier for dangerous people to get guns – and they accused Republicans of being “in the grip” of the National Rifle Association.

“I’m disappointed by the results tonight, but far from surprised,” said Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Connecticut, who led last week’s 15-hour filibuster. “We knew breaking the NRA’s stranglehold on this Congress would be a long, uphill climb.”

Those comments were echoed by advocates on both sides, who claimed the opposition refused to accept their “common sense” proposals.

The NRA accused Democrats being “more interested in playing politics than addressing their to keep Americans safe.” Meanwhile, former Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and her husband Mark Kelly, founders of Americans for Responsible Solutions, said senators “ignored the will of the people and stood with the gun lobby.”

Kelly, Giffords and other groups had come out in favor of proposals by Murphy and Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California.

Feinstein’s measure would have given the attorney general the authority to immediately prohibit gun sales to anyone on the government’s no-fly list and other terrorism watch lists. Murphy’s proposal would have required background checks on gun buyers in all gun sales, closing a current loophole that does not require such checks online, between individuals and at gun shows.

The measures needed 60 votes to end debate and call for a vote. Feinstein’s amendment failed on a 47-53 vote and Murphy’s failed on a 44-56 vote.

Republicans said those proposals were too broad and would have violated constitutional protections, countering with their own proposals by Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, and Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa.

Cornyn’s proposal would have halted gun sales for 72 hours to anyone who had been on a terrorism watch list in the preceding five years, giving authorities three days to investigate – and possibly arrest – the individual. It would guarantee an appeal process for those who thought they were wrongly denied a gun. His measure did not get the required 60 votes, falling short on a 53-47 vote.

Grassley’s measure, offered to counter Murphy’s, would have beefed up the National Instant Criminal Background Check System used in gun sales, but would not have expanded it to gun show sales. It failed to advance, also on a 53-47 vote.

In remarks after the vote, the mood of dejected Democrats was summed up by Feinstein, who said “here we go again” of the continuing Senate stalemate.

2 comments

  1. One day, we in Arizona will suffer a gun-inflicted calamity on the scale of Orlando. (We already suffer many gun-inflicted deaths a day, but that’s not newsworthy anymore.) Then all the princely Senators and House Members who regularly vote against controls on who gets to own and use a deadly weapon, military-grade or personal, will call for “a moment of silence” and weap great crocodile tears for the dead and wounded.

    Such is the fatal indolence and hypocrisy of these “public servants” whom we elect and pay to protect us, but who choose instead to protect the weapon manufacturers’ sales and earnings (for a mere pittance in terms of campaign contributions — and the ownership and use of deadly weapons by the craziest among us. Here’s hoping they never have to experience the collective pain of those they condemn to loss and sorrow. They haven’t the character to recover from such an emotional beating as they condone daily.

  2. It is beyond time for some sanity to prevail in gun sales.
    Nobody needs semi, and automatic weapons. This is
    posturing, and clearly pushes mayhem.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 

x

Check Also

Phoenix police questioning of Ernesto Miranda on rape charges led to the Supreme Court’s 1966 decision requiring police to advise defendants of their rights – now known as a Miranda warning. (Photo courtesy the Phoenix Police Museum)

Fight to remain silent: People often waive Miranda rights, experts say

Academics and attorneys who estimate that people waive their Miranda rights as much as 80 percent of the time – or even more often, according to some experts.