Quantcast
Home / Election 2014 / Appeals court hears arguments over Clean Elections

Appeals court hears arguments over Clean Elections

Three U.S. Court of Appeals judges in San Francisco listened to arguments Monday over a lawsuit challenging whether matching funds provided through Arizona’s Clean Elections law are constitutional.

Attorney Bradley Phillips, representing Clean Elections advocates, said the program helps prevent corruption in the elections process by assuring that candidates don’t have to be beholden to private interest groups.

The opposition led by Goldwater Institute attorney Nick Dranias said that matching funds should be looked at as a fine against the nonparticipating candidate for spending campaign money.

Clean Elections candidates collect a certain number of $5 donations from constituents and agree not to accept money from special interest groups in exchange for a lump sum of public money to fund their campaigns.

Copyright 2018 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

One comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 

x

Check Also

In this April 16, 2013, file photo, a "bathtub ring" shows the high water mark on Lake Mead near Boulder City, Nev. Tension among U.S. states that rely on the Colorado River escalated into a public feud when an Arizona water provider was accused of manipulating the level of Lake Mead amid a prolonged drought, threatening supplies for 40 million people in two countries. (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson, File)

Feud erupts between Central Arizona Project, US states over Colorado River

Tension over the drought-stressed Colorado River escalated into a public feud when four U.S. states accused Arizona's largest water provider of manipulating supply and demand, potentially threatening millions of people in the United States and Mexico who rely on the river.