Home / economy / Ducey scraps monthly media briefings on unemployment

Ducey scraps monthly media briefings on unemployment

chart down arrowFollowing some less-than-spectacular jobless reports, the Ducey administration is scrapping at least temporarily – and perhaps forever – the monthly media briefings on the state’s unemployment situation.

Kevin Donnellan, director of the Department of Administration, said his agency will continue to produce and distribute monthly reports. The state gets federal funds to gather the data, which are public records.

But it was always the monthly briefings, which have been provided for more than three decades, that provided the “why” behind the numbers. And it has been that analysis which has sometimes been at odds with the claims of not just Doug Ducey but prior governors about how well things are doing.

Until now, however, no administration has pulled the plug.

That analysis has most recently been done by Aruna Murthy, the agency’s director of economic analysis.

Donnellan not only is ending the monthly briefings. He also said Murthy, who has conducted them for more than five years, has been fired.

State officials said they could not comment on any personnel matter. Murthy said she was told her services are no longer needed.

But the move comes on the heels of Murthy pointing out some questions not only about the pure unemployment numbers but noting that many of the jobs actually being created in Arizona are in low-wage sectors of the economy.

Two months ago, Murthy reported the state’s seasonally adjusted unemployment rate dropped a sharp three-tenths of a point to 6.2 percent. By contrast the national 5.5 percent jobless rate was unchanged from February.

But Murthy, in her briefing, said there are reasons to questions whether the figures, while mathematically accurate, are actually true or just an aberration.

Then last month, the numbers for April showed another two-tenths of a point decrease, to 6 percent.

Murthy, however, said the data hide a much more downbeat picture of Arizona’s economy, pointing out that private employers in the state added only 300 new workers from the prior month – the smallest gains for any April since the end of the recession.

In explaining the difference, Murthy pointed out that the jobless rate is based on a random survey of households, asking people if they are employed and, if not, are they looking for work.

But Murthy said the actual number of jobs created comes from a far more extensive survey of businesses throughout the state. And that paints a far different image than the pure unemployment rate.

That, however, is only a piece of the state’s economic condition.

Murthy reported that that wages in Arizona are stagnant – at best. She said while average weekly earnings nationally have continued to rise at a fairly steady rate, federal statistics for Arizona show a trend that is flat and, in some cases, actually declining in the last two years.

And that’s not even considering inflation.

Gubernatorial spokesman Daniel Scarpinato said there was no pressure from Ducey or aides to halt the briefings or fire Murthy.

And Donnellan said there is no connection between that and the lackluster reports and the media attention they got. He said it was just a decision about priorities.

“It may not be the best use of our internal resources,” he said of the monthly briefings which normally take an hour, plus any time staffers spend in preparation.

“I wouldn’t say a policy change has been made,” Donnellan said. “But we’re looking at changes.”

Donnellan said that, if necessary, he would make an economist available to provide “color commentary” for reporters.

But Don Wehbey, who at one time did the monthly briefings, said there’s much more involved than that, saying raw data, by itself, is often not useful.

“Sometimes there’s explanation needed,” said Wehbey who now is economics director at the National Association of State Workforce Agencies. Wehbey said the briefings enabled him to deal with “the nitty-gritty” of the details and answer questions.

“That’s sometimes not clear on the surface of the figures,” he said.

And Dan Anderson, who also previously had been in charge of the reports, said there are situations where having someone provide an analysis of the raw numbers actually could make some otherwise bad news less onerous.

“In most cases when the unemployment rate rises, it’s an area of concern,” he said.

“But sometimes, when the economy is improving, the unemployment rate rises not because the economy is getting bad but rather that people are entering the workforce, looking for jobs,” Anderson continued. But the moment they start looking, they’re counted as unemployed.

The Ducey administration has aggressively promoted the idea of putting out positive messages about the state and the economy.

Last month the governor convened a summit of business leaders, telling them he wanted to improve the state’s image. He said that negative reputation around the country feeds back on itself home in Arizona.

“I believe that too many have fallen into a doom-and-gloom cycle where everything is wrong, where the cynic is winning, telling other that nothing is right,” Ducey said. “I say it’s time we shed an inferiority complex inside this state.”

And he separately announced formation of a new business group, called the Zanjeros, billed by the governor’s office as formed “to promote Arizona’s reputation as a prime place to conduct business with an unmatched quality of life.”

“We need Arizonans spreading the word about our great business climate,” Ducey said on Twitter of his group.

Wehbey said it’s is important that the reports and the analysis that goes with them to be done without political influence. He said while governors view the numbers through the lens of trying to land businesses, it serves no one if what is produced is skewed.

One comment

  1. What a sad situation. I worked in that department for 21 years and, coming from a newspaper background, strived to make the reports non-political and accurate as editor of the monthly press release. On at least two occasions I took issue with one governor who wanted to put their own stamp on the report and tilt it to favor their administration. Only my merit employee status probably kept me from being fired. Now none of the employees in that department, as far as I’m aware, have merit protection, which makes it even more political than it was when I worked there until 2009.

    Only federal money is used to provide the data and reports. Not one dime comes from the state, although the department attempted to get state funding numerous times in order to get more data on smaller, rural areas of the state. The Legislature and Governor never approved any money for that purpose, as the federal funding has continually declined over the last decade.

    To fire someone for “telling the truth” about the state’s economy is a sad commentary on the Ducey Administration. But I’m not surprised as Ducey ran on a platform that his opponent hurt education as a member of the Board of Regents bec. tuition hikes were allowed when state funding declined, while Ducey would be a friend of education. You can see by his first budget, he will do anything to protect millions in tax cuts for major corporations at the detriment of education. Expect more of these type of overreactions to anyone at the state who doesn’t say what Ducey wants. This is what happens when you get rid of the merit system like his predecessor did.

    Brent Fine

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also


Senate says lawmakers not subject to public record laws

Senate President Karen Fann is taking the position that Arizona courts cannot force her or any other member of the Arizona Legislature to comply with the state's Public Records Act.

/* code for tag simpli.fi */