Home / education / Arizona charter schools turn 20 boasting of higher test scores, greater options

Arizona charter schools turn 20 boasting of higher test scores, greater options

Students watch a science lecture at Leading Edge Academy’s Gilbert campus. (Photo by James Anderson/Cronkite News)

Students watch a science lecture at Leading Edge Academy’s Gilbert campus. (Photo by James Anderson/Cronkite News)

Nestled between a taco shop, a gas station and a church lies the Gilbert campus of Leading Edge Academy. A former Albertsons grocery store on the strip mall is what the small public school calls home.

Leading Edge is one of more than 600 charter schools in Arizona, which has been fostering the often-misunderstood educational system for 20 years.

“It’s kind of what I would call a hybrid model,” said Becki Krueger, Leading Edge’s business manager. “We’re a public-funded, privately run company, basically.”

Charters receive per pupil funding from the state like traditional district public schools but differ in not being able to receive funding for facilities and cannot sell bonds and pass overrides. State law requires charters to admit students who apply on a first-come, first-served basis, unlike private schools.

“We are under the same rules as a district school. We cannot turn away students,” Krueger said.

Charter school enrollment has steadily grown to more than 170,000 students since the Legislature allowed them in 1994. The state has just more than 1 million kindergarten through 12th grade students in public schools. The goal of the charter school system, according to Arizona Charter Schools Association CEO Eileen Sigmund, is “to improve student achievement and provide parents a choice.”

School choice is a popular idea among charter school supporters, who say that not all students perform well in large, traditional public schools.

Charter schools in Arizona are diverse, varying from Montessori to Waldorf to STEM – science, technology, engineering and math – Sigmund said. The schools either operate independently, belong to public school district or are members of a charter company. Leading Edge brands its campuses as small schools with a family-like atmosphere. Great Hearts Academies promotes a classical education in its school network.

“It is a spectrum of what the community needs and wants and what leaders want to begin,” Sigmund said.

Lori Anderson, a principal at Leading Edge, said she spent the beginning of her career in a Texas region where district schools were the only option. The lack of competition gave less incentive to improve, she said.

“Arizona gets a lot of grief about not doing things right with education, but I think that’s one thing that they have done well: building an atmosphere and an environment that’s friendly for charter schools,” she said. “I just think choice makes us all better.”

Although every charter differs in its performance on state and national tests, Arizona charters have performed better as a whole than the overall Arizona average.

Charters must teach to the same state standards and take the same standardized tests as district schools, but charter operators say they go beyond that.

“To us, those standards are not even a benchmark,” Great Hearts CEO Christine Jones said. “We maintain our academic rigor at a much higher level than whatever the state minimum is.”

The recently released AzMERIT scores show charter students scoring 10 percent and 8 percent higher on the English and math tests, respectively, than the rest of the state, according to the Arizona Charter Schools Association.

Sigmund said results from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) demonstrated the quality of Arizona charter schools.

“We are top in the nation, and I cannot not emphasize that result,” she said.

Rep. Eric Meyer, D-Paradise Valley, said one of the goals of the charter school system was to give an option to families in low-income regions. He points to ASU Preparatory Academy’s Downtown Phoenix campus as a great example. When the high school graduated its first class this year, it said 76 percent of the students were moving on to a four-year university.

“They’re graduating lots of kids. Their dropout rate is very low, and then a lot of those kids are going on to post-secondary education. That’s a model that looks like it’s worked,” he said.

Meyer said there needs to be a plan to invest in more vulnerable neighborhoods, as opposed to wealthier regions such as Scottsdale.

“You could just say, ‘You can’t open up a charter school within three or five miles of an A- or B-ranked school.’ Those neighborhoods are being served adequately now,” he said.

Although Meyer acknowledged that every case is different, he said he believes many charter school companies have profit motives.

“I’m not saying that happens uniformly, but it does happen. These entities are set up to make money, and in some cases, they’re owned by out-of-state companies, and their goal is to turn a profit for their shareholders,” he said.

Jones of the nonprofit Great Hearts said operating as a for-profit would have hindered its vision, although doing so would be “appropriate and perfectly legal.”

“But we’ve determined that, first of all, we don’t exist to make money off the state, and second of all, that our stated goal to teach truth, beauty and goodness and to lead with virtue and integrity seemed incompatible with a for-profit model to the founders of this organization,” she said.

Sigmund said less than 5 percent of Arizona charters operate through for-profit companies, but that it used to be more common. And that, she said, was out of necessity.

“When you start a school, you need to have a facility, you need to have teachers, you need to have marketing, and you’re not paid by the state,” she said. “So a lot of our leaders 10-15 years ago were (investing) their own personal savings.”

Banks would only loan to for-profit organizations in some cases, Sigmund said. But the increased availability of grants to charter start-ups made it possible to switch to nonprofit. Imagine Schools, which runs several campuses in the state, transitioned to nonprofit this summer.

Leading Edge is a nonprofit organization, but Anderson said it has experienced benefits from the business background of some of its leaders. She said having that customer service mindset spurs the school to provide the best education possible.

“We have to think about what’s best for our kids, even if it’s not the most convenient thing for us,” she said.

Like all schools, Arizona charters need the state to figure out its funding plan for education.

Gov. Doug Ducey’s Classrooms First Council has set a goal of simplifying the school funding formula and establishing funding equity between districts and charters. Lawmakers and educators agree that the current details of school funding are complex.

“I think there’s only about five people in the entire state that totally understand it,” said Sen. Debbie Lesko, R-Peoria.

Sigmund said a pause in charter enrollment growth might be realistic due to the state’s recession and education budget cuts. But a solid funding plan would trigger growth again, she said.

“Arizona is on the path to stable and predictable funding, and that’s what our school leaders want to see before they invest in expansion,” she said.

One comment

  1. Only when the charter laws of Arizona and similar states allow choice in both directions — that is, when such schools can select among applicants, after applicants have chosen to apply — as occurs in magnet schools and in America’s world-leading higher education sector, will chartered schools be worth pursuing. In particular, the choice to opt out of test-obsessed state schooling, mistakenly reinforced recently via the “Every Student Succeeds” Act, is generally unavailable to chartered schools, since any time spent on subjects other than those tested will tend to detract from the scores published that largely determine a school’s reputation, and plodding along at the slow pace in two subjects as mandated by the unrevised Common Core (still in effect in Arizona, if renamed) will leave the children of Arizona families, and those in other states stuck in similar inferior systems, uncompetitive with the leading foreign-education youth who increasingly land on our shores and take competitive university spots away from local youth whose parents paid to build those university colleges, only to see their own children shut out of them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also

tech-school-620 (003)

State funding cuts endanger Joint Technical Education Districts, advocates warn

JTED educators across the state warn that these programs could go away in the next few years because of diminished state funding. One administrator calls the most recent budget cut by the State Legislature “non-survivable.”

/* code for tag simpli.fi */