Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / education / Advocates demand $1.2 billion more for education

Advocates demand $1.2 billion more for education

Jar for coins

Calling the money from Proposition 123 a nice start, education advocates are now demanding lawmakers restore the other $1.2 billion they say has been cut from K-12 funding since 2009.

Dick Foreman, president of the Arizona Business and Education Coalition, said during a press conference Monday at the Capitol that the money is there. He said it’s time for lawmakers to revisit the hundreds of millions of dollars in tax credits that have been granted, largely to businesses, including a batch of credits enacted in 2011 that Dana Naimark of the Children’s Action Alliance said will cut revenues by $700 million by 2019.

“That’s money we should be investing in our schools,” Naimark said.

But getting that done could prove difficult, if not impossible.

It takes a two-thirds vote of both the House and Senate — and concurrence of the governor — to end existing credits. And Gov. Doug Ducey was elected on a promise to reduce taxes every year of his tenure.

Gubernatorial press aide Daniel Scarpinato reiterated after Monday’s event that his boss will oppose any tax hike. But he opened the door a bit for what he called “tax reform.”

“Certainly, part of that discussion would be how do you do it in a way that results in more dollars for education,” Scarpinato said. But he quickly added that while Ducey wants to “improve the tax code,” that also means “people aren’t paying more in taxes.”

That still leaves the question of how to find the cash that even Ducey said is needed beyond the approximately $300 million a year that Prop. 123 will raise for the next decade.

By contrast, the Children’s Action Alliance figures schools lost $371 million a year in funding for textbooks and technology. There’s $260 million the state is not providing in funds to maintain building, $218 million when state-funding of full-day kindergarten was repealed and an assortment in cuts in other funding like teacher development and early childhood education.

“We do have money now,” said Joe Thomas, president-elect of the Arizona Education Association.

“We’re coming out of the recession,” he continued. “We have unspent revenues, we have unspent rainy day funds.”

That contention has been disputed by Republican legislative leaders who said the fragile state of the economy means the state cannot rely on the current revenue stream. So instead they have used some of those extra dollars to undo the bookkeeping gimmicks that were used to balance the budget in prior years.

Scarpinato said there may be a middle path of sorts.

He said the state now has a “structurally balanced” budget, with revenues exceeding expenses without the need for the gimmicks.

Scarpinato also noted Proposition 123 finally settles the lawsuit filed in 2010 by schools after lawmakers ignored a voter-mandated requirement to boost aid to schools every year to match inflation. A trial judge already had ordered the state to immediately boost aid by more than $330 million; the settlement was reached before she could address the more than $1 billion the state had failed to pay in prior years.

And that settlement, Scarpinato said, is coming largely out of state land trust proceeds and not the general fund. All that, he said, puts the state on good financial footing heading forward.

“Which means that we actually are in a position where we can have these discussions because we’ve got money in the bank,” Scarpinato said.

Patience — and trust — may be in short supply.

Beth Simek, president-elect of the Arizona PTA, said the closeness of the vote shows a large number of people are concerned that lawmakers will not follow through with the promise that Proposition 123 was billed as only a first step.

“Based on track records, to be honest with you, I can’t blame them,” she said. What that means, Simek said, is keeping pressure on lawmakers — and getting involved and electing representatives and senators who are committed to improving K-12 funding.

Simek said that’s going to take more than the 32 percent turnout in last week’s elections.

“The legislators have been counting on our apathy,” she said.

“Well, the August primaries are right around the corner, and November isn’t that far behind,” Simek continued. She said voters need to ask candidates more than the generic question of will they support public education but instead be pressured into spelling out exactly what they will do.

But don’t look to Simek’s organization to suggest to people how they vote. She pointed out the PTA is formed as a nonprofit organization which cannot get involved in politics.


  1. You knew, of course, that the greedy breeding, soccer moms would be back at the tax well for more…along with the connected, education lobby, and others who profit from a failed education system.

  2. “Education advocate” while an impressive term seems to have a somewhat plastic definition.
    Any advocate of any issue needs to look to the structure of that for which they are advocating.
    The board system is at the very least an seriously outdated, archaic method of managing education, allowing “factions” to thrive and compete for finances in a survival of the fittest kind of way.
    The bigger your lobby the bigger your cut. and currently the “fittest” are that part of the “education machine” concealed in the board system.
    Top heavy with Phd’s and special interest “experts” and way short on every day moms and dads, not part of the machine, you can be sure that the kids will lose. It matters little how much money you throw at the beast that is the board system – you will never be enough. A case in point, take the cost of “seminars” touted by the several special interest organizations to discuss the lofty notions of “education”, far beyond the what the average parent can afford. So as parents your child’s future is intrinsically tied to powerful “think tanks” scheming to influence the various boards.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also

Lawmakers aim to lure Hollywood to state with tax credits (access required)

State lawmakers have agreed to use the lure of millions of dollars in tax credits in hopes of bringing Hollywood to Arizona.

/* code for tag */