Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / legislature / House committee approves hairstyling bill

House committee approves hairstyling bill

(Deposit Photos/Nemar)

(Deposit Photos/Nemar)

Concluding public safety would not be harmed, a House panel voted Monday to let people style and blow dry hair for money without first getting a license from the state.

HB 2011 would repeal a section of law which now requires at least 1,000 hours of training at a state-licensed school before someone can “dry, style, arrange, dress, curl, hot iron or shampoo and condition hair.” But licensing would remain in cases where there are “reactive chemicals to permanently straighten, curl or alter the structure of the hair.”

The 5-4 vote by the House Committee on Military, Veterans and Regulatory Affairs came over the objections of dozens of individual stylists who insisted that the public needs the kind of oversight that now occurs through the State Board of Cosmetology.

But it also came amid questions from committee members — all of whom are male — about exactly what is considered styling.

Rep. Michelle Ugenti-Rita (R-Scottsdale)

Rep. Michelle Ugenti-Rita (R-Scottsdale)

For example, answering a question from Rep. Noel Campbell, R-Prescott, Rep. Michelle Ugenti-Rita, R-Scottsdale said that includes things like using heated curling irons and flat irons. But she argued these are hardly tools that require special training.

“This is strictly blow-drying hair with tools you can get at Walgreen’s,” she said. That includes not only blow dryers but also curling irons and hairspray.

But Tracy Marrs, who said she owns three franchise salons, said it’s not a simple question of what devices unlicensed stylists could use.

“It’s more of who are we putting this really hot tool in the hands of,” she said, saying the styling irons can get as hot as 450 degrees.

Marrs argued that there is no problem with the licensing requirement, telling lawmakers it should not be repealed for people who are “just money hungry” and want to be able to hire people with less training who can be paid less.

And Kendall Ong, another salon owner, said trained people can recognize and deal with things like lice and infectious disease. He said allowing unlicensed people to handle hair creates “the possibility of a health crisis.”

But Anthony Dynar, who owns his own cosmetology salon, said it makes sense to allow him to have a shop with both licensed cosmetologists and unlicensed stylists. And he mocked the idea that somehow a person without 1,000 hours of formal training will spread disease.

“It does not take a license to know not to serve a client with lice or open sores,” he said.

Ugenti-Rita did not dispute that money is at least part of the issue.

“This will increase competition, drive down costs,” she said.

Committee members lined up for and against the bill along party lines.

Rep. Anthony Kern, R-Glendale, suggested the training requirement for something as simple as styling hair seems excessive. Kern said it requires just 585 hours of training to become a law enforcement officer.

And Rep. Mark Finchem, R-Oro Valley, said a line needs to be drawn as to what is appropriate state regulation and what is not.

“Are we going to regulate the sale of hair dryers?” he asked. “I fail to understand why the state of Arizona should be regulating something that we can each do for ourselves.”

But Rep. Eric Descheenie, D-Tuba City, said total deregulation makes no sense.

“This is a health care issue,” he said, with improperly trained people unable to spot and control scabies, lice and even the highly contagious and hard-to-treat MRSA virus. “Some of these things can take people’s lives.”

The measure now needs approval of the full House.

One comment

  1. I think what people, including our dear Governor fail to understand or consider, is that the licensing board regulated the industry for the protection of the public. Cosmetologists are trained in infection protection, applied industry related chemistry and biology; including the chemical structure of the hair and skin. The education (as least in some states- I was trained in Colorado with over 2100 hours, and maintain a license in Arizona) is comprehensive instruction on recognizing and preventing infections, infestations, and diseases; and the transmission of them. A licensed stylist knows how to properly sanitize their tools and takes steps to prevent spreading if lice, skin infections, fungus, and other problems that can arise from incompetent service. Those hours of education aren’t just for techniques of what direction to comb or curl the hair. Our electrical implements typically reach a higher temperature than those designed for home use. We are trained in how to prevent burning or otherwise injuring the customer during a service. I feel that this ruling is an insult to the industry and devalues my education. This proves that Arizona as a state officials do not appreciate what goes into safely providing a service, and that they don’t actually care about the health and safety of the public. Maybe I should petition the Governor to deregulate the medical profession. Perhaps he would consider letting me charge for treating minor injuries and head colds without a license. After all, who needs thousands of hours of education to wrap a cut, or apply an ointment?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also

Roe overturned – States to decide questions on abortion

Women in the United States have no constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Friday, a decision abortion foes say immediately outlaws the procedure in Arizona.

/* code for tag */