Home / courts / Court upholds child prostitution sentence in case where no child involved

Court upholds child prostitution sentence in case where no child involved

Judges office

A conviction and sentence for child prostitution doesn’t necessarily require that an actual child be involved, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

The justices rejected the arguments by Francis F. Kraps that he could not sentenced to both enhanced and consecutive prison terms because the “child” he had arranged to meet at a Prescott-area motel actually turned out to be an undercover police officer.

Justice Ann Scott Timmer, writing for the unanimous court, said Arizona law makes it a crime to engage in prostitution with a minor if the person knows — or believes — that the youth was 17 or younger. That, she said, makes it legally irrelevant that Kraps was actually conversing online with someone who was older.

Kraps was one of several people arrested in 2014 in a “sting” operation conducted by various Yavapai County law enforcement agencies.

Officers posed online as 16-year-old runaways willing to engage in sexual conduct for money. When they showed up at the hotel room and met the “child” they were arrested.

By law, those convicted of such offenses must be sentenced to at least seven years in prison and can be incarcerated for up to 21 years. There also is no possibility of probation.

But in a pretrial ruling, Yavapai County Superior Court Judge Jennifer Campbell concluded the lack of an actual juvenile meant the mandatory sentence does not apply. Prosecutors appealed.

In Thursday’s ruling, Timmer pointed out that the law specifically says a defendant cannot claim to be innocent of child prostitution simply because the child turns out to be an undercover police officer. She said the same logic, then, has to apply to the sentencing phase.

Still, Timmer conceded that perhaps the statute is not as clear as it should be.

She said the public policy of Arizona is to “give fair warning” of what will land someone behind bars.

“Given the importance of providing clear notice of the consequences for criminal conduct, we urge the Legislature to be as explicit as possible for specifying criminal penalties,” Timmer wrote.

The ruling sends the case back to Yavapai County for trial.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also

Sen. Martha McSally in December 2018 when Gov. Doug Ducey announced he would tap her the following month to replace Sen. John McCain. PHOTO BY HOWARD FISCHER/CAPITOL MEDIA SERVICES

Court upholds Ducey’s decision on U.S. Senate election

Martha McSally can keep the U.S. Senate seat she was given by Gov. Doug Ducey through at least the end of the year, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Thursday.