Quantcast
Home / education / Schools chief proposes eliminating references to evolution in science standards

Schools chief proposes eliminating references to evolution in science standards

Diane Douglas details Tuesday why she wants an additional $680 million infusion into public schools this coming budget year, though she said it's not up to her where to find the cash. (Capitol Media Services photo by Howard Fischer)

Superintendent of Public Instruction Diane Douglas  (Capitol Media Services photo by Howard Fischer)

The state’s top school official is trying to downplay – and in some cases remove entirely – references to evolution in the standards of what students are supposed to be taught in Arizona high schools.

Superintendent of Public Instruction Diane Douglas is proposing to eliminate requirements that students be able to evaluate how inherited traits in a population can lead to evolution. Replacing that last word would be “biological diversity.”

Elsewhere, Douglas seeks to repeal language that student develop the understanding of how “adaptations contribute to the process of biological evolution.” Instead that verbiage would read “how traits within populations change over time.”

And a reference to the “mechanism of biological evolution” would be supplanted with “change in genetic composition of a population over successive generations.”

The word “evolution” would remain in some other places, though it would specifically be referred to as a theory.

But it isn’t just the idea of evolution that’s on Douglas’ hit list.

The standards crafted by a committee had said students should be able to analyze and interpret “supporting evidence for the Big Bang theory and the scale of the universe.” That verbiage is gone, replaced with the more generic “theories related to the scale and expansion of the universe.”

But Douglas told Capitol Media Services this isn’t her attempt to replace the teaching of evolution with “intelligent design.” That essentially is a theory that life is too complex to have evolved at random and must be the product of some specific design, presumably by a higher power.

“We have absolutely nothing in these standards in reference to intelligent design,” she said.

The changes have drawn particular concern after KPNX-TV in Phoenix unearthed an audio recording of Douglas from last November where she was speaking at an event for Republican candidates.

“Should the theory of intelligent design be taught along with the theory of evolution?” she said in response to a question. “Absolutely,” Douglas said.

Douglas said Monday she was simply giving her personal beliefs on the issue. And she called reports that she is trying to put intelligent design into the curriculum “fake news.”

But in those November comments, the school superintendent did not separate out her own beliefs from those of what she thinks should be taught in public schools.

“I had a discussion with my staff because we’re currently working on science standards, to make sure this issue was addressed in the standards we’re working on,” Douglas said at the time.

Douglas stressed Monday that the word “evolution” does remain in the standards, at least in several places.

“But we need to look at it from all sides,” she said.

“The point of education is really to be seekers of the truth, whatever the truth may be,” Douglas said. “And that’s what all standards should work towards.”

She acknowledged that the wording changes she wants made does open the door to teachers providing students with alternate theories of how life on earth got to where it is..

“Evolution is a theory in many ways,” Douglas said. “That’s what our children should understand.”

She said there are parts of evolution that are proven science, other elements are “very theoretical.”

“And if we’re going to educate our children instead of just indoctrinate them to one way of thinking, we have to be able to allow them to explore all types of areas,” she said.

So does Douglas believe there’s any scientific basis behind intelligent design?

“Maybe there will be someday,” she responded.

“Once up a time people said the earth was flat and it couldn’t possibly be round,” Douglas said. “I don’t know.”

Tory Roberg, lobbyist for the Secular Coalition for Arizona, said her concerns are not assuaged by the fact that Douglas is not proposing to add intelligent design to the standards. She said Douglas clearly realizes she can’t do that, citing federal court rulings which have slapped down schools that have attempted to require the teaching of intelligent design as an unconstitutional effort to put a religious belief into a classroom.

Still, Roberg, who has children in the Washington Elementary School District, said what Douglas is proposing is still wrong.

“It’s a disservice to our kids, a disservice to our teachers,” she said.

But Ed Reitz had a different take on it when he spoke at a hearing last month.

“The teaching of evolution is something that concerns me because it’s a theory and it’s not science,” he said. Reitz said his new book, “America’s Last Chance: Where Hope Lives,” with a picture of a boy on the cover praying next to a cross and U.S. flag, devotes an entire chapter to the issue of evolution and humans descending from previously existing vertebrates.

“In the first place, it is illogical,” Reitz testified. “When we observe nature, our natural instincts tell us there was design and planning somewhere.”

And Reitz said if schools would teach creationism there would not be the need for vouchers which let parents use taxpayer dollars to send their children to private and parochial schools which do not have to follow the standards for teaching science that govern public schools.

“We want creation taught in schools and God brought back in,” he said.

The proposed changes drew opposition from Joe Thomas, president of the Arizona Education Association.

“We support the teaching of the scientific theory of evolution in the schools,” he said. “Scientific standards should be based on scientific research and nothing else.”

And Thomas said this is more than a question of standards.

“It risks Arizona students falling behind the rest of the nation and world if we start watering down our education standards,” he said.

Thomas also said he was skeptical about Douglas’ claim that there are other valid theories that should be taught in schools.

“If there are other theories that exist, the science that has escaped the science community, the superintendent should bring those to the forefront.”

Public comments on the proposal are being accepted through May 28.

9 comments

  1. When the undereducated try to educate you get stuff like “intelligent design.” Teach it in your church, not the public schools.

  2. Superintendent Douglas is scientifically correct in the word changes she has submitted. There is absolutely zero evidence that any life form has evolved from any other life form. Some finches speciated on some islands and that somehow proves one of my great grandfathers was a rock or a complex chemical? Depending on how far back you want to take your family tree.

    The theory of evolution is based on a naturalistic philosophical worldview, that has very little to do with real science. Real science is supposed to be neutral in regard to the supernatural, not anti. A proper interpretation of the Edwards vs Aguillard decision allows intelligent Design and a supernatural view of origins to be taught in our public school classrooms. Some states are already doing so.

    What an eye is, what it does, and how we treat it for disease is real science. How we got an eye and why we have one should be discussed in a philosophy class regarding philosophical worldviews and origins.

  3. WOW. The dumbing down of children continues. This is disgusting and outrageous.

  4. A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can be repeatedly tested, in accordance with the scientific method, using a predefined protocol of observation and experiment.
    Established scientific theories have withstood rigorous scrutiny and embody scientific knowledge
    Ms. Douglas does not know this definition…. as in Theory of Gravity… Heliocentric Theory of the solar system, etc. etc.
    She is not qualified to hold the position she does.

  5. OMG. “Should the theory of intelligent design be taught along with the theory of evolution?” she said in response to a question. “Absolutely,” Douglas said. Ever heard of the Dover trial? ID is not science according to the courts and therefore should not be taught as such. Glad I don’t have kids in school here but feel sorry for all children that are taught nonsense. Let’s teach critical thinking as well.

  6. Kimberly Pierick

    This is not dumbing down. There are as many or more people who believe in creationism as those who believe in evolution. An intelligent being (God) planned and created this universe, not a “big bang theory.”

  7. Dr. Arv Edgeworth

    Actually I just realized that everything I said in my previous post was utter garbage. Please disregard it.

  8. I am astounded by the number of knuckle-draggers who do NOT understand what science is. I am growing ashamed on behalf of my alma mater…….ASU.

    Get Krauss in on the discussion.

  9. It is amazing that for more than a hundred years theory has been the hallmark of of all the Government and atheist/secularist “Scientist” which have yet to move any of these theories into the realm of proven scientific knowledge. With all the advances in “DNA”, microbiology chemical process and space exploration the evidence is consistently going against the theories in a steady trudge toward what the Bible has said all along. Take a look at the video “Genesis Paradise Lost” part 1. Beware it may blow some of your theory into the dust bin of history along with “Phrenology” and belief in superior and inferior races of people

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 

x

Check Also

vote-1-web

Prop 306 foe warns of ‘Trojan horse’ to undermine Clean Elections

A measure Republican lawmakers put on the November ballot could determine how much Arizonans actually know about who is trying to influence political campaigns.