Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / legislature / GOP lawmakers’ feud ends with dead election bills

GOP lawmakers’ feud ends with dead election bills

From left are Kelly Townsend and Michelle Ugenti-Rita

From left are Kelly Townsend and Michelle Ugenti-Rita

State senators voted Tuesday to kill a host of changes in state election laws as a long-simmering dispute between two Republicans spilled out into the open.

And the result was mutually-assured destruction of both their measures.

The fight, playing out on the Senate floor, started when Sen. Michelle Ugenti-Rita, R-Scottsdale, refused to support SB1241. That proposal contained a wish list from Sen. Kelly Townsend, R-Mesa, of fixes she said needed to be made in how elections are administered.

For example, it sought to set up a procedure for county or state prosecutors to get involved when there is an inconsistency between someone’s signature on an early ballot and what is on file with the county recorder.

It also dealt with a requirement that people who register to vote in Arizona must cancel their registration in the state from which they moved. And it provided that anyone who votes at a polling place get a paper receipt showing their ballot has been accepted.

But Ugenti-Rita said many of these issues never got a public airing in the Government Committee which she chairs. And she said it makes little sense to make massive changes in election laws now, before the Senate-ordered audit is completed and recommendations are made for necessary fixes to the law.

Townsend shot back that she had, in fact, sought a hearing on these issues in the Government Committee but that Ugenti-Rita told her there simply wasn’t enough time.

“I think that’s a pretty substandard approach,” she said, saying her bills “never had a chance.”

So Townsend did an end run of sorts. She had the unheard provisions tacked on when her original bill — dealing only with paper receipts for ballots — went through the House.

That set the stage for Tuesday’s vote when the Senate was asked to approve those changes.

When Ugenti-Rita objected, things got personal.

Townsend said the needed fixes won’t be enacted “because of pride, because of nonfeasance, because the chairwoman didn’t like that I went around her” and because Ugenti-Rita is unhappy with the number of provisions in the final bill.

“For those reasons, this chairwoman is denying the people of Arizona confidence and election security,” she said. “That’s unacceptable.”

With no Democrats in support, Ugenti-Rita’s “no” vote killed the measure.

But there was immediate payback.

Townsend then refused to support SB1083, a proposal by Ugenti-Rita to require recounts in more situations. And, again, without Democrat backing, that bill also died.

Under current law, a statewide election requires an automatic recount when the margin of difference between candidates or side of a ballot measure is 0.1% or fewer than 200 votes, whichever is lower. SB 1083 would change that to a flat 0.5% difference.

That number is significant.

In 2020, Joe Biden outpolled Donald Trump in Arizona by 10,475 votes out of more than 3.3 million ballots cast for the two candidates, not counting those who voted for others. That did not trigger a recount based on the 200-vote figure.

Had SB1083 been in place, any difference of fewer than 16,670 votes would have mandated the recount. But with Townsend’s “no” vote and no support from Democrats, the measure failed.

Senate procedures do allow reconsideration. But that would require Ugenti-Rita and Townsend making peace before the session wraps up later this year.


  1. Cat fight.

    And Liberty suffers.

  2. To Nick : Yours is a sexist criticism. Beyond that, do you really see nothing wrong about a senator “tacking on” additional requirements to a significant new election bill, without going through committee discussion?

  3. Nick – one of these women is a RINO paid to torpedo the election legislation. Now which voted to end debate in committee then claimed the bill could not be voted on since provisions were not debated in committee? Yes – the one with the hyphenated last name.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also

Ward, Trump, GOP, Twitter, Hobbs, Brnovich, tweet, campaign, election, gubernatorial, Center for Internet Security, Arizona Republican Party, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Georgia, Arizona, Lake, state bar

Ward wants Brnovich to investigate Hobbs’ office contacting Twitter

The head of the Arizona Republican Party, Kelli Ward, wants Attorney General Mark Brnovich to investigate whether Democrat Katie Hobbs used her official position "to suppress free speech.''