Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

HB 2375 is a step forward for housing fairness and is just common sense

W. Aaron Montaño Searles

In the spirit of building consensus, as my mother always taught me, it’s essential to approach discussions with an assumption of good intentions. Unfortunately, some have resorted to characterizing our efforts as classist and racist, which is hurtful and is simply unfounded. I would warmly invite legislators and skeptics to visit our communities. They’ll discover a racially and economically diverse group of residents, including dedicated teachers, young families just starting out, first responders, and seniors living on fixed incomes. In fact, we are seeing the rise of million-dollar units that risk displacing long-time residents. I encourage everyone to take the time to get to know us. I assure you that our districts are welcoming and inclusive.

Recently, Phoenix City Councilwoman Anna Hernandez shared an opinion piece that misrepresents the bipartisan HB 2375, suggesting it jeopardizes affordable housing. She invoked redlining and discrimination. While I respect her passion, I find these claims troubling. As a proud Latino, I am concerned when accusations arise about racism related to HB2375, as it is actually designed as a common-sense solution that supports both historic neighborhoods and new housing opportunities.

I wonder if Councilwoman Hernandez truly believes that placing a million-dollar condo in a historic district constitutes affordable housing. Her comments regarding redlining and exclusion do a disservice to those who fought against real instances of such injustices. It’s important to recognize that Latinos and lower-income families do indeed reside in historic neighborhoods.

All HB2375 seeks to do is ensure that historic homes are preserved, preventing them from being torn down for middle-housing developments, while still allowing for thoughtful housing solutions that include everyone in our neighborhood. 

It’s worth noting that Hernandez played a significant role in shaping the previous bill, HB2721, when she was a state representative. The measure contributed significantly to our current challenges. There seems to be a disconnect, as many in the community feel unheard. It’s been clear that HB 2721 requires revisions, a point acknowledged by both Democrats and Republicans alike. 

Hernandez has admonished neighborhoods for seeking support from government relations professionals; ironically, I believe that approach would not have been necessary had there been more willingness from lawmakers in previous sessions to engage directly with all stakeholders instead of ignoring them. Regardless, we welcome the chance to be part of the housing solution, but in a thoughtful manner.

I believe the latest opposition to HB2375 stems from opponents’ growing frustration that their numerous attempts to derail this bipartisan initiative have not succeeded. Despite the efforts of individuals who solely push national middle housing policy to halt progress, the bill continues to move forward because many recognize the need for practical, sensible solutions that benefit our communities. 

It is easy to kill a bill, to stop something from happening, and to complain. It is much harder to build consensus, look for solutions that benefit everyone, and work in a bipartisan way for a better future for all. We in historic communities are up to the challenge and hope others will join us.

W. Aaron Montaño Searles is President of LMC Enterprises Consulting and a native Arizonan committed to community advocacy, serving as the President of the Willo Historic Neighborhood Association board, Save Historic Arizona Co-Chair, and Chair of Encanto Village Planning Committee.

HB 2375 preserves our historic districts, and that’s a good thing.

Mary Durand

Imagine my surprise upon reading Anna Hernandez’ guest commentary about my neighborhood, with my street sign prominent in the photo. Little did I know that those of us who live here are considered rich, racist, isolationist and unwelcoming to anyone who wants to live, work and raise a family in a historic neighborhood. 

A little research showed that Ms. Hernandez does not live in this, or any other historic neighborhood, so I dug deeper to try and understand where the negative comments about us came from. Then I learned she wrote HB 2721, the bill that HB 2375 is meant to amend.

HB 2721 was intended to increase affordable housing statewide, a very laudable goal shared by everyone I know. It’s the restrictions that the bill placed on historic districts that were troublesome, as they removed the ability to work with new or upgraded homes and apartments to maintain the unique and significant history and architecture of these neighborhoods.

Once that fact was widely known, town halls ensued for months with input from all citizens, for and against the new rules. After a great deal of research and discussion, our mayor and city council have given full support to HB 2375 as it allows us to continue to abide by the Special Conservation District objectives that the City of Phoenix approved in 1986. I’d encourage anyone with questions to please read that document as it will explain the history of Willo and reasons for our objection to some provisions of HB 2721. This plan to enhance communities should be replicated, not eliminated.

In 1984, I rented in Willo. People wondered why — the homes were quite old, crime was an issue, there were very few restaurants, no light rail, no ASU, and no real life after 8 pm. I saved for a down payment for six years and purchased a home in 1990. It’s over a hundred years old and has been continually repaired and improved, as have all the other residences here. This area has grown and prospered because we have invested our time and energy in improving every component of this warm and wonderful place to live, work and raise a family. 

All we ask is the continued ability to maintain the unique mix of architectural and historic aspects of any new or upgraded building. We are not denying anyone access to our neighborhoods. We have always warmly welcomed new residents and have a wonderful mix of every ethnic and religious background. To say otherwise is just wrong.

As I travel this city, I see many neighborhoods that are just like Willo was when I moved here. They are in need of residents who will create and care for each other and their homes. 

My hope is that the Senators who vote on HB 2375 will not listen to the name calling and lying abuse heaped on us. My community is not rich, racist, isolationist or unwelcoming. We are not NIMBY. We want folks to join us in keeping historic districts alive and well. Please allow us to keep and maintain these historic neighborhoods by supporting HB 2375.

Mary Durand is a resident of the Willo Historic District.

HB 2375 is a step backward for housing fairness and just plain wrong

Anna Hernandez

Arizona is facing a housing crisis. Working families can no longer afford to live in Phoenix. This crisis has been made worse by a shortage of available housing opportunities. In 2024, the Legislature took an important step forward to remedy this shortage by passing HB2721, which allows “middle housing”— modest homes that are more affordable for working families, such as duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes — within one mile of a city’s downtown core. The goal was simple: allow more diverse and attainable housing options in areas with good access to jobs, transit, and other services. 

Now, just as cities are beginning to implement that law, rich neighborhood groups and their lobbyists are threatening to undermine our progress toward creating more opportunities for working families. 

Rich neighborhood groups and their lobbyists are pushing HB2375, which will create special exemptions from housing laws just for them. Rather than participating constructively in local planning discussions, these groups are asking the state to shield their neighborhoods from change. 

In Phoenix, we have already had this debate. 

When the state passed its middle housing requirement, the process was contentious, particularly after opposition from the Willo neighborhood, where homes regularly sell for more than $1 million. Of course, the city still had to comply with the state law, and I hoped that the small group of opponents would soon come to see the benefits of the policy for the overall city. 

Unfortunately, the benefits for everyone are being overshadowed by the fears of a few wealthy homeowners who do not want to see any changes to a status quo that benefits their interests. 

The neighborhoods that want special exemptions are precisely the kinds of neighborhoods where additional housing makes the most sense. They are close to downtown jobs, public transit, schools and health care. They provide access to opportunities that many families are currently locked out of because of high housing costs and restrictive zoning. 

Letting these neighborhoods deny new residents access to opportunities would reinforce patterns of exclusion, like red-lining, that have shaped our cities for generations. 

What makes this effort even more frustrating is that the city of Phoenix is already engaged in a thoughtful conversation about expanding housing choices. And the city council directed staff to study how middle housing could be implemented more broadly throughout Phoenix. That work is happening now and it is exactly the kind of planning process communities should undertake when addressing growth and affordability.

Housing policy should not be dictated by whichever neighborhood can afford high-paid lobbyists. It should reflect the needs of the entire community. Phoenix is a city of more than 1.6 million people, all of whom deserve a fair chance at attaining a stable home. Every neighborhood must do its part to ensure all residents have the best housing options possible. 

At a time when Arizona faces a severe housing shortage and a lack of diverse housing options, using disproportionate financial and political power to block new homes, particularly in high-opportunity areas, sends the message that only the rich should have access to these opportunities. And that message is plain wrong.

Anna Hernandez has been a serving Phoenix Councilmember since 2024. 

Phoenix voters approved the CapEx and I-10 light rail expansion. It’s time for the city council to carry that vision forward!

Versión en español disponible a continuación

Anna Hernandez

Phoenix voters spoke clearly when they approved light rail expansion in 2000, 2004, 2015 and 2024. And taxpayers have been paying for light rail since 2000. Yet today, the Phoenix City Council is considering to “re-evaluate” the light rail extension — a move that would risk losing hundreds of millions in federal grant funding, hundreds of millions in economic development, increased housing where we need it most, and undermine the democratic choice Phoenix voters have already made. 

National research is clear. High-quality public transit is a powerful tool for equity. Transit investments reduce barriers to employment for low-income workers who are less likely to have access to a car while creating local jobs and supporting our unions. And public transit plays a critical role in reducing local air pollution and carbon emissions while supporting sustainable mobility in a growing city.

Let’s be clear, this vote is about whether we as elected leaders have the vision it takes to lead this city. Will we become a global city that thinks big, builds boldly, and is ready to take our place as an international leader? Or will we undermine our recent achievements in attracting chip manufacturing and international non-stop flights and go back to being a stop-over that no one takes seriously? 

That is why this moment matters. When voters approve major infrastructure investments, our responsibility as elected officials is not to revisit them for political convenience, but to deliver. “Re-evaluation” at this stage risks becoming a substitute for action — one that delays opportunity for communities that have already waited too long. 

Dismantling the CapEx and I-10 extensions will cost Downtown, West Phoenix, and Maryvale neighborhoods opportunity, equity, and long-term economic returns. It will cost us thousands of jobs, both in the light rail construction, and in the businesses that will follow light rail’s path. 

Working class Black and brown residents in Maryvale have lost light rail once already. In 2019, Phoenix Council voted down a Camelback extension. Now they may lose it a second time. That can’t happen. 

I urge my colleagues to move forward with the voter approved light rail expansion along CapEx and the I-10, and to put community needs ahead of hesitation. 

And to Phoenix residents, join us at the City Council Policy Meeting on Tuesday, Jan. 27 at 2:30 PM, and complete the Valley Metro survey before January 27 by selecting Option A. 

Let’s move Phoenix forward!

Anna Hernandez is a Phoenix Councilwoman. 

 

Los votantes de Phoenix aprobaron la expansión del
tren ligero por CapEx y la I-10. ¡Es momento de que el Concejo Municipal de Phoenix lleve esa visión hacia adelante!

Los votantes de Phoenix hablaron con claridad cuando aprobaron la expansión del tren ligero en 2000, 2004, 2015 y 2024. Y las y los contribuyentes han estado pagando el tren ligero desde el año 2000. Sin embargo, hoy el Concejo Municipal de Phoenix está considerando “re-evaluar” la extensión del tren ligero, una decisión que pondría en riesgo cientos de millones de dólares en fondos federales, cientos de millones en desarrollo económico, vivienda adicional donde más se necesita, y que además socava la decisión democrática que ya tomaron las y los votantes de Phoenix. 

La investigación nacional es clara: el transporte público de alta calidad es una herramienta poderosa para la equidad. Las inversiones en transporte reducen las barreras al empleo para trabajadores de bajos ingresos, quienes tienen menos probabilidades de contar con un automóvil, al mismo tiempo que crean empleos locales y fortalecen a nuestros sindicatos. Además, el transporte público desempeña un papel fundamental en la reducción de la contaminación del aire y de las emisiones de carbono, y apoya una movilidad sostenible en una ciudad en crecimiento. 

Seamos claros: esta votación trata sobre sí, como líderes electos, tenemos la visión necesaria para dirigir esta ciudad. ¿Nos convertiremos en una ciudad global que piensa en grande, construye con valentía y está lista para asumir su lugar como líder internacional? ¿O vamos a socavar nuestros logros recientes en la atracción de la industria de semiconductores y vuelos internacionales directos, para volver a ser solo una escala que nadie toma en serio? 

Por eso este momento importa. Cuando los votantes aprueban grandes inversiones en infraestructura, nuestra responsabilidad como funcionarios electos no es volver a cuestionarlas por conveniencia política, sino cumplirlas. La “re-evaluación” en esta etapa corre el riesgo de convertirse en un sustituto de la acción, uno que retrasa oportunidades para comunidades que ya han esperado demasiado. 

Desmantelar las extensiones de CapEx y la I-10 le costará a los vecindarios del Centro, del Oeste de Phoenix y de Maryvale oportunidades, equidad y beneficios económicos a largo plazo. Nos costará miles de empleos, tanto en la construcción del tren ligero como en los negocios que seguirán su recorrido. 

Los residentes Negros y Morenos de clase trabajadora en Maryvale ya perdieron el tren ligero una vez. En 2019, el Concejo de Phoenix votó en contra de la extensión por Camelback. Ahora podrían perderlo por segunda vez. Eso no puede volver a suceder. 

Exhorto a mis colegas a avanzar con la expansión del tren ligero aprobada por los votantes a lo largo de CapEx y la I-10, y a poner las necesidades de la comunidad por encima de la indecisión. 

Y a las y los residentes de Phoenix: acompáñennos en la reunión de política pública del Concejo Municipal el martes 27 de enero a las 2:30 p. m., y completen la encuesta de Valley Metro antes del 27 de enero, seleccionando la Opción A. 

¡Sigamos moviendo a Phoenix hacia adelante!

Anna Hernandez es concejala de la Ciudad de Phoenix.

Dems unhappy with budget governor negotiated

The passage of the budget June 15 revealed a rift between Gov. Katie Hobbs and some Democratic lawmakers who said she did not negotiate well, while other unexpected supporters of...

Get 24/7 political news coverage and access to events honoring top political professionals

Housing bill near, lawmaker says

Lawmakers aligned with both housing advocates and homebuilders are close to striking a deal with cities on a proposal designed to help address Arizona’s housing shortage by boosting construction of...

Get 24/7 political news coverage and access to events honoring top political professionals

Quinonez resigns from House

Another Democrat resigned from the state House of Representatives Thursday, less than six hours after the caucus obtained full membership earlier in the morning.   Rep. Marcelino Quinonez, D-Phoenix, announced his...

Get 24/7 political news coverage and access to events honoring top political professionals

After Hobbs’ veto, other housing bills are moving

While Gov. Katie Hobbs vetoed a bipartisan housing measure this week, several other housing bills that she said she supports are moving through the Legislature. The House Government Committee unanimously...

Get 24/7 political news coverage and access to events honoring top political professionals

You don't have credit card details available. You will be redirected to update payment method page. Click OK to continue.