Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Home news / Arizona group proclaims support for allowing guns in schools following Sandy Hook shooting

Arizona group proclaims support for allowing guns in schools following Sandy Hook shooting

A group that advocates for pro-gun, state legislation said Wednesday guns should be allowed in Arizona public schools to provide protection against shootings such as the one in Connecticut.

“It’s long past time to, at the very least, allow our school faculty and staff the option to be trained and armed,” the Arizona Citizens Defense League said in a statement. “Only then will they be capable of dealing with a situation like this.”

Amid public debate over what to do in response to the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary, the league is “now looking at things that can be done to heighten security in schools,” spokesman Charles Heller said during an earlier interview. “We hadn’t been before.”

Arizona law now generally bans taking guns on school grounds.

The statement by the league decried the violence in Connecticut and stopped short of announcing a 2013 legislative proposal to allow guns on campuses.

Heller said his group is considering options, but he couldn’t discuss specifics. The session starts in mid-January, and no proposed bills filed as yet deal with gun issues.

A teachers union leader said everybody wants to protect students but allowing school personnel to have guns on campuses would pose safety and security threats, partly by opening the door to unintended consequences.

“That’s the last thing on their minds, to be carrying firearms in close proximity to students,” said Arizona Education President Andrew Morrill. “That’s not going to help.”

Gun control proposals went nowhere in the Republican-led Arizona Legislature after the January 2011 shooting that wounded then-Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson.

In the next two legislative sessions, state lawmakers twice approved bills to allow guns in many public buildings without airport-style security and once to allow them on higher-education campuses.

However, Republican Gov. Jan Brewer vetoed all three versions of those two bills that reached her desk. She said in May her veto of the latest such bill reflected public unease.

Matthew Benson, a Brewer spokesman, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the league’s statement.

Arizona has permissive gun laws and a Wild West heritage. Guns can be carried openly, sometimes jolting newcomers, particularly in urban areas.

On Monday, Brewer sounded disinclined to weaken the right to bear arms in response to the Connecticut shooting.

“I’m not sure if it’s something that needs to be addressed in that respect,” Brewer said, adding that a stronger behavioral health system “would probably be something that we ought to look into.”

Hildy Saizow, president of Arizonans for Gun Safety, said relaxation of gun-free zones at schools and other places would be “really extremist legislation.”

Instead, now is the time to support national legislation that should include toughening requirements for background checks of gun purchasers, Saizow said.

Alan Korwin, a Scottsdale author and publisher of books on gun laws, said the media is whipping public sentiment into a “mob mentality” in favor of new gun restrictions after the Connecticut shootings.

That ignores the benefits of allowing guns where they’re not now allowed, he said.

Gun-free zones “enable criminals and infringe on the rights and abilities of Americans to protect themselves and their children,” Korwin said. “We trust teachers with our children. Certainly they should be qualified” to have guns at schools.

An Arizona legislator who sponsored a bill after the 2011 Tucson shooting to prohibit extended magazines that hold more than 10 bullets said it would be dangerous to allow guns at schools.

“I do not see anything good of a massive arms race on our college campuses or, God forbid, on our elementary schools,” said Rep. Steve Farley. “There’s no good that’s going to come of that.”

Farley, a Tucson Democrat who becomes a state senator in January, said he won’t re-introduce a new version of his bill in 2013. Such restrictions are best handled by Washington to avoid a patchwork of state laws, he said.

Farley said he proposed the 2011 bill because Tucson shooter Jared Loughner fired 30 shots from a handgun with an extended magazine. Six people were killed and 13 injured in the attack, and Farley said there would have been less carnage if Loughner had to reload sooner.

Farley’s bill died after not getting a hearing from a House committee.

Farley also said he wants the Legislature to consider providing adequate funding for programs to identify and treat mentally ill people and to protect children from physical abuse so they don’t develop psychological problems.

One comment

  1. Before taking a stand against allowing legal concealed carry in public schools, everyone should review the Lott and Landes study “Multiple Victim Public Shootings” from Yale and the University of Chicago Law Schools to see what the statistics say. This is readily available on the internet. Their study results were both surpising and dramatic, in their words, and identified only one policy factor that made a significant difference.
    We should also look at what has happened in Utah since they eliminated their “Gun Free Zones” around public schools and now allow licensed concealed carry in these schools. They have seen no massive arms race and certainly do not consider this to have been extremist legislation. Only time will tell if any unintended consequesnces arise that negate the intended benefit of reducing the probablility and severity of a multiple victim school shootings in Utah.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also

Tuition proposals a mix of hikes, holding steady, unknowns

Arizona's three state universities have announced tuition proposals for the 2020-2021 academic year, proposing increases for some students but holding steady for others while waiting to decide in still other categories.