Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Opinion / Commentary / Let Arizona residents draw the map

Let Arizona residents draw the map

Tony Sissons

Tony Sissons (From Research Advisory Service website)

On the chance that the state’s legislative map must be redrawn before the next federal census, let me suggest a workable method that (1) retains the Redistricting Commission’s authority, (2) observes the Arizona Constitution’s redistricting principles, and (3) reduces the influence of political parties.

I am a Phoenix-based redistricting consultant who has managed redistricting processes for county supervisorial districts, community college districts and city council districts.  All 31 redistricting plans adopted by my client jurisdictions have been precleared by the U. S. Department of Justice on first submission, and none have been challenged in court.  In the 1991 and 2001 rounds of redistricting, I drew each plan, but for this go-round, I worked with a Phoenix-based computer mapping company to offer each jurisdiction the option of providing their residents with a web-based redistricting application.

The counties of Gila, Graham, Mohave and Navajo and the cities of Globe and Phoenix implemented the online resident mapping.  Resident-submitted maps were adopted in Gila County (supervisorial and community college plans), Navajo County (supervisorial), and Phoenix (a merging of two resident plans for new council districts).  Each plan was precleared by DOJ.  The mapping application was sufficiently ‘friendly’ that, in Phoenix, over 40 percent of the 170 residents who logged on to the website submitted a complete plan.

Here is my suggestion:

  • The commission would engage an online-mapping firm, widely extend the invitation to submit a map, establish guidelines, and decide the relative importance of each redistricting principle.
  • The commission would appoint an evaluation panel to objectively score each submitted plan on each redistricting principle, and determine each plan’s composite score.
  • The evaluation panel would forward the four highest-scoring plans to the commission without identifying the submitting person or organization.
  • The commission would not be able to make any modifications but, after conducting any necessary public hearings, would simply adopt one of the four plans.

The last two points are key.  If this method is adopted or ordered by a court, I would expect political parties to submit maps along with many other groups and individuals.  If every participant knows, from the start, that the commission  (1) must adopt one of the finalist maps,(2) is barred from making any changes, and (3) cannot know who submitted each plan, then each map-drawer would be motivated to create the most reasonable and constitutionally-compliant map in the hope that theirs would be the one chosen.  Indeed, the more partisan the submission, the higher the likelihood of not being a finalist.

Tony Sissons is president and owner of Research Advisory Services, a Phoenix public policy and demographic research consulting firm.


  1. Tony Sissons, you Solomon, you! You must have kids, because this is how battle-tested parents decide how to divide something: “You, Skipper, get to cut the cupcake into two pieces, and then you, Muffy, get to have first pick.” Goshdarnit if Skipper doesn’t manage to cut the cupcake into two exactly equal pieces right down to the atom! Works every time.

  2. I spoke with you at the Phoenix redistricting meetings and you couldn’t answer any of my questions.

    Your answer always was “This is really hard to do”

    If you are mad you didn’t get the job, shouldn’t you know more?

  3. I spoke with you at the Phoenix redistricting meetings and you couldn’t answer any of my questions.

    Your answer always was “This is really hard to do”

    If you are mad you didn’t get the job, shouldn’t you know more?

    Read more:

  4. Alejandra, I’m very puzzled by your comment. I don’t know what it was that you say I was characterizing as ‘really hard to do’. Certainly, redistricting is a complicated process in any jurisdiction, with many competing goals. The residents of Phoenix (and other jurisdictions) demonstrated, however, that they understood — and used with aclarity — the mapping software the City staff and consultant team made available.
    I don’t know what job you are referring to. As to my need to ‘know more’, I think that the 31 clients jurisdictions for whom I managed successful redistricting processes would feel that I ‘knew enough’. If I’m missing your point, and I’m sure I am, please don’t hesitate to call me at 602-230-9580.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also

Protect prescription drug affordability for AZ families

As working families and businesses across Arizona already struggle with record inflation and the ongoing economic recovery, it is more important than ever that lawmakers protect patients from higher drug costs.

/* code for tag */