Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Featured News / Bill would ban college free speech zones

Bill would ban college free speech zones


State lawmakers will decide whether those who have something to say on college and university campuses can be told when and where they can say it.

The proposal by Rep. Anthony Kern, R-Glendale, would make it illegal for state-run schools to designate any area on campus as a “free speech zone.” In fact, HB2615 requires universities and community colleges to convert any such existing area to a memorial or monument.

Kern isn’t the only one to outlaw such special areas.

The Alliance Defending Freedom already has filed suit against Paradise Valley Community College over what the public interest law firm says is the illegal practice of requiring groups to get permits, provide prior notice — and then be restricted to certain areas of campus. The college has yet to respond to the lawsuit.

Kern told Capitol Media Services his legislation is not based on that incident. In fact, Kern said he was unaware of the litigation.

Instead, he said it came from his own experience when he was younger working with a church group that wanted to hand out material at Glendale Community College during July 4th activities. Kern said there was no problem for the first few years.

“All of a sudden, they came up with this free speech zone which was way away from the people,” he recalled. “It defeated the whole purpose.”

Kern said colleges still would be able to have some limited controls if his measure becomes law.

For example, he said they could restrict the times that amplifiers could be used. Similarly, Kern said his legislation is designed to protect only non-commercial speech, meaning that merchants would not be able to use the law to set up booths on campus to sell items.

And Kern said a college might be able to ask for some advance notice from those who want to reserve a specific space to prevent conflicts with other groups.

“You don’t want people hurting each other,” he said.

Kern said his legislation is limited to colleges and universities and would not bar a city hosting an event from shunting off protesters to free speech zones far from the event. That has been the practice by both political parties for some time now during their quadrennial conventions.

He said that’s a different situation.

“The reason why college campuses and universities are kind of singled out is because these have always been the bastions of free speech, the bastions of free debate,” Kern said.

The lawsuit pending in Maricopa County Superior Court was filed on behalf of Brittany Mirelez and Richard Shemberger.

According to their lawyers, Mirelez, who is a student at the college set up a table last October in the “speech zone” to talk with students about joining the Young Americans for Liberty student group she is trying to start on campus. The lawsuit says she was asked to leave because she had not obtained prior permission as required by college policy.

In filing suit, the pair are challenging not just the permission requirement but the whole designation of a specific 0.2 acre area on the 92.4 acre campus. The result, the legal papers say, “closes an entire forum for speech activity.”

“The sidewalks and open spaces of PVCC’s campus are designated public forums — if not traditional public forums — for speech and expressive activities by students enrolled at PVCC,” the lawsuit states.

“A public college’s ability to restrict speech — particularly student speech — in a public forum is limited,” it continues. “The First Amendment’s Free Speech Clause prohibits censorship of political expression.”

There was no immediate response from the college to the litigation.

In one way, Kern’s legislation goes beyond what is in the lawsuit. He said campuses should be open to all, regardless of whether they are enrolled at the school.

“The entire campus should be a free speech area, in my opinion,” Kern said.

One comment

  1. Something is in the news!!!! Y’all know what that means, right! Time for a brand new law! Can’t you feel the knees jerking now! Doesn’t matter if it’s a really stupid law, something must be done, we want change, and we want it NOW! We can say it’s in the name of free speech and against those silly free speech zones and it’s ok-we don’t like those silly free speech zones anyway. Instead, we should pass this stupid law which would ALLOW STUDENTS TO SUE THE SCHOOL IF THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO YELL THEIR HEADS OFF IN EVERY CLASSROOM OR LECTURE HALL ON CAMPUS!!!!! Seriously, why not just make a rule that if you want free college – don’t vote Bernie – just sue the state because someone made a tasteless joke and the school didn’t do anything about the horrible bullying. Oh, wait, they are allowed free speech too. Ok, you can also sue for not being allowed to tell the jokes you like. Free college for all!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also

home buyers, defects, contractors, construction

Court: buyers of new homes are entitled to sue builders for defects for several years (access required)

Buyers of new homes are entitled to sue builders for hidden defects for up to eight years -- even if they have signed contracts waiving that right, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled Wednesday.