Quantcast
Home / Election 2016 / 2016 Ballot Measures / DES director forwards email designed to ‘blow up’ pro-marijuana arguments

DES director forwards email designed to ‘blow up’ pro-marijuana arguments

Department of Economic Security director Tim Jeffries stands outside his office, adorned with a "Director J :)" sign. (Photo by Rachel Leingang, Arizona Capitol Times)

Department of Economic Security director Tim Jeffries stands outside his office, adorned with a “Director J :)” sign. (Photo by Rachel Leingang, Arizona Capitol Times)

The head of the state Department of Economic Security sent a message to all of his employees on a state-owned email list with a link to a story with arguments against Proposition 205.

In an email sent Sunday, Tim Jeffries forwarded a political argument by Seth Leibsohn who has been working against the campaign to legalize marijuana for recreational use. The subject line is: “Alcohol ‘safer’ than marijuana???????’’

Leibsohn in the email that Jeffries forwarded, said it was his intent to “blow up’’ the arguments of marijuana legalization proponents. And Liebsohn attached an article he wrote for an online magazine with various claims about the lack of safety of the drug and saying that the pro-205 campaign was “very misleading, even dangerous, message, based on bad science and sophistic public deception.’’

That attachment was also part of the email Jeffries sent to the entire DES staff.

An aide to Attorney General Mark Brnovich would not opine on whether what Jeffries did violates any laws.

Instead, Ryan Anderson cited a formal opinion Brnovich issued just this past year — and specifically on the subject of the marijuana ballot measure — where he said it is illegal to use “public resources’’ for the purpose of influencing the outcome of elections. And Brnovich said that includes ballot measures.

That inquiry begins with the question of whether “public resources’’ were used.

In that opinion, Brnovich said the definition is “quite broad.’’ It includes not just money, facilities, vehicles and computer hardware and software but also personnel, equipment “or any other thing of value.’’

There was no expenditure of public monies in Jeffries sending out the email, apparently from home, albeit using his DES email account. But the list of employees’ email addresses is not public. And political consultants routinely pay to obtain mailing lists from organizations.

Anderson said it’s an open question under Arizona law of whether a state-owned email list is a “thing of value.’’ But he said the mailing does raise some issues.

“At the very least, government officials and their employees should avoid any appearance of a possible inappropriate use of public resources,’’ Anderson said.

DES spokeswoman Tasya Peterson said Jeffries was “unavailable’’ at all on Wednesday to answer questions about the email. But Peterson said there is nothing wrong with what her boss did.

“Senior leadership regularly circulates articles and news stories regarding current events,’’ she said in a prepared statement. “The email sent by Director Jeffries was sent for purely informational purposes.’’

She said the agency recently sent out a news article about Proposition 206 which, if approved by voters, would hike the state minimum wage to $12 an hour by 2012. Peterson said that is “of interest to our Division of Employment and Rehabilitation Services Division for employers and job seekers.’’

But Peterson sidestepped repeated questions about the fact that what Jeffries sent out was not a news story about Proposition 205 but a self-published opinion piece by Leibsohn attacking the idea of legalizing marijuana. Nor would she respond to questions of whether Jeffries, in simply providing information on current topics, would also forward published pieces with a pro-205 spin to DES employees.

Jeffries is on record as opposing the ballot measure, having made a $500 contribution to the committee trying to kill it.

This isn’t the first time emails from Jeffries to his workers have raised questions.

Earlier this year he sent out messages to staffers about his trip to Lourdes and offering to take their written “special intentions’’ with him. But Paul Watkins, chief of the civil division of the attorney general’s office, concluded no laws were broken because the messages were “private speech,’’ even though they were sent through the state email system.

What is different here is that the content of this message was not personal but political.

More to the point, the content clearly had a point of view about Proposition 205. And Brnovich, in that 2015 opinion, said the law defines “influencing the outcome of elections’’ — the act for which public resources cannot be used — include “supporting or opposing a ballot measure, question or proposition … in any manner that is not impartial or neutral.’’

Anderson said no decision has been made whether the AG’s office will conduct an independent probe into what Jeffries did.

“We don’t police individual agency directors’ emails or weigh in absent a specific complaint,’’ he said. And Barrett Marson, publicist for the pro-205 campaign, said there are no plans to file a formal complaint against Jeffries.

In any event, Anderson said, there is another option short of a formal inquiry.

“This appears to be a matter that could be addressed internally between Director Jeffries and his boss,’’ he said, meaning Gov. Doug Ducey.

But Ducey does not think the man he hired for the job did anything wrong.

“The director was simply sharing an article,’’ said gubernatorial press aide Daniel Scarpinato.

He said Ducey believes that electioneering using state resources “is completely unacceptable.’’ But Scarpinato said the content of this email does not fit that description.

In the attachment that Jeffries emailed out, Leibsohn said his goal was to undermine the argument by proponents of Proposition 205 that the measure would regulate marijuana like alcohol.

“It is very misleading, even dangerous, message, based on bad science and sophistic public deception,’’ Leibsohn wrote.

4 comments

  1. Seth Leibsohn sits on the board of No on 205 (as does Yavapai County Attorney Sheila Polk and a couple other undistinguished know-nothings) which receives, it states right on its homepage, “Major funding by Insys Therapeutics Inc, Arizona Chamber of Commerce & Industry, Services Group of America [serving the restaurant and fast-food chains that employ the low-income people DES oppresses] and Empire Southwest LLC [a Tucson dealer in Caterpillar products].” Insys has already been indicted for pushing super-addictive opiates on patients via compliant doctors. So far, Seth’s not published a single letter decrying Insys’ role in addicting Arizonans of all ages to drugs with absolutely destructive properties. He and the other board members are basically shills for commercialized pushers of synthetic drugs whose monopolistic franchise would crumble if much-safer and effective marijuana was legalized.

    Given that, it’s hard to see how what Pistol-Packin’ Tim, by making Seth’s letter known and available to DES employees, has done is anything other than using public IT, taxpayer-financed, to promote a political point of view paid for by commercial interests with hundreds of millions of dollars at stake, who care little for the lives they benefit by and/or destroy.

    If Brnovich doesn’t prosecute, then Trump’s frequent complaint that “This election’s rigged!” will obviously apply here in Arizona. And as I recall from other AZ Capitol Times stories, Jeffries isn’t the first Ducey-appointee to use public facilities to promote private points of view, commercial as well as moralistic. Could it be that the Governor’s found appointing abusers is a useful way to promote special interests without appearing to be anything other than “Everybody’s Governor”? If so, maybe he isn’t so stupid after all.

  2. Just another corrupt public official. It’s absolutely clear that cannabis is by far safer than alcohol. According to the Center for Disease Control booze kills over 88000 people per year plus another 16,000 traffic fatalities directly attributed to alcohol intoxicated drivers. Cannabis has never killed from toxic overdose in all medical history and has almost no statistical history of traffic problems.

    The obvious facts make you wonder why a public official would go against science and logic. The answer is either in incompetence, corruption or both. Alcoholic beverage and pharmaceutical drug corporations are lining the pockets pockets of politicians and lawmakers in an effort to stem the tide of legalization. Don’t let corrupt public officials influence your vote. 150 billion dollars is spent every year for the purchase of a illegal cannabis in the United States and that money is going directly to criminals and organized crime instead of legitimate business. 30 billion a year is lost potential tax revenues and another 15 billion is flushed down the toilet for needless law enforcement of cannabis consumers. Time to end the inane and destructive War on Drugs and legalize.

  3. He should check out his lazy employees that work at the DESIGN in Mesa, Arizona on 1st St. I went in last week on a Monday at 6:00pm I and others were turned away and told that we would have to return on Tuesday for an interview or a phone interview. I waited on the phone all day Tuesday and Friday, using up my minutes to get things straightened out. On Monday at 5:00pm his employees stopped calling numbers and just sat in the front where we could see them and then they all went home, abandoning all of us.

  4. I find it hard to take the shrill nature of the anti-pot message seriously when major funding and support comes from the pharmaceutical industry … let alone the hypocrisy of “protecting our children” by supporting the alcoholic beverage industry the way we do in Arizona where it is common to walk into a supermarket and see aisles of booze adjacent to kids toys … let alone the 10s of thousands of young adults who have life long criminal records because they were caught with pot instead alcohol. The cognitive dissonance involved in this debate goes hand in hand with our national politics.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 

x

Check Also

Cattle graze along the East Verde River (Photo by Center for Biological Diversity)

Environmental group alleges cattle trashing river (access required)

Environmental groups have filed suit to remove most of the cattle off of 143 miles of the Verde River watershed.