Quantcast
Home / Opinion / Commentary / For Arizona’s children, the clock is ticking for funding schools

For Arizona’s children, the clock is ticking for funding schools

opinion-WEB

Some education advocates, like myself, feel a strong sense of urgency. After all, each year that a child can’t read creates lasting impacts for them, their family, and ultimately, the state’s economy. We constantly hear that clock ticking. Sure, it’s very easy to get bogged down in political cycles, state statutes, and annual budgets. If you are in this arena long enough, that sense of urgency gets tempered with patience and humility. But it never goes away.

Rebecca Gau

Rebecca Gau

So, when Governor Ducey revealed his budget proposal, I was cautiously optimistic. He hit the right notes on teacher support, early literacy, and a focus on low-income schools. He made education his top priority. And he was right to point out that in certain areas, 8th grade math for instance, Arizona is one of the only states showing improvement (NAEP scores, 2015). The investments we made as a state are starting to pay off.

But to use a sports analogy, we have scored a run in the first inning. There’s still so much game to go.

Sixty percent of all Arizona 3rd graders can’t read at grade level. Think about that for a second. Faced with that 3rd Grade stat, is the $10 million the governor wants to devote to early literacy programs in 2018 enough to make a significant impact for our kids?

There is so much more we can do, not just in funding, but in strengthening supports for teachers facing the toughest reading challenges. We can free up regulations that keep some students segregated from their classmates as they try to learn to read. Right now, that practice is failing, causing those students to fall further and further behind.

And, on a grander scale, you may have noticed there was no talk from the Governor’s Office about a key date looming on the calendar: Proposition 301, a sales tax currently generating approximately $600 million for education every year, is set to expire in FY2021. If it were allowed to fizzle, Arizona teachers would lose a decent chunk of their base pay! We are having enough trouble keeping good teachers from fleeing the state seeking better pay and conditions, and that’s after recent pay increases due to Proposition 123.

When Proposition 301 passed, it was meeting the education needs of Arizona in 2000. The education funding landscape has significantly changed since then. Our state learned we can’t rely on construction cycles to create a stable economy. We must do what any smart investor does. We must diversify.

Stand for Children Arizona believes Proposition 301 must be renewed, and even increased.  These discussions need to start now, to make sure Arizona’s children don’t lose more ground, but instead are given a long-term, sustainable funding solution. Stand for Children Arizona has been researching options and learning from financial experts across the state and the nation. The funding structure needs to be rooted in accountability that is meaningful and drives improvement. This is doable, but it takes leaders to pull together, learn together and chart a course together.

In December, we released a poll showing 77 percent of Arizonans believe the state should be spending more on education. Additionally, 65 percent want to increase the Proposition 301 sales tax from 0.6 cents to a full penny. The people seem to be ahead of the politicians on this one.

Now, I understand we shouldn’t throw good money at bad results. But, as the governor points out, Arizona schools are doing better. It’s time to invest in good results. This type of commitment to Arizona’s children will pay dividends in every sector of the economy. It’s the smart thing to do.  It’s the right thing to do.

— Rebecca Gau is executive director of Stand for Children Arizona.

3 comments

  1. Rebecca is absolutely right……but it doesn’t matter. Here in Arizona we are dealing with two ideologic barriers (1) a cut taxes at all cost, never raise taxes, oppose any and all efforts to raise revenue mindset. This has permeated and been a driving force for over two decades.
    The second barrier (2) is the notion that charter schools and vouchers are the answer. Never mind that studies have shown otherwise, charter and vouchers for all is the ideology.
    Until we can change that singular mindset, the facts don’t matter.
    That said, Keep up the good fight, Rebecca Gau!!

  2. How have “students shown otherwise”?

  3. here we go again, if we just had more money all those failing children would be in the 100 percentile of students in the world. If the beginning salary for teachers was $250,000.00 they would still be the same teachers in the same classroom with the same students achieving the same results. The children will still have the same amount of classroom hours per year. Do teachers deserve a living wage? Absolutely but to compare the salary paid in Arizona agains another state is simply not right unless you also factor in the cost of living in Arizona agains the cost of living in the other states. When the various School Boards decide to place the emphasis on teaching reading, writing, math and history, then and only then will there be a change in the grade level scores by the students. The tax payers should adequately fund the schools but also demand the School Boards change their emphasis on classroom studies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 

x

Check Also

school-chalkboard-620

No matter the vote, empowerment scholarships have helped many

In November, Arizona voters will decide whether expanding the state’s Empowerment Scholarship Account program makes sense. It was originally started to help the parents of disabled children, foster children, or parents who are active military. It evolved, with little controversy, to include adopted children, children attending D/F rated schools, and those in Native American communities. About 5,000 children are now using the scholarships to attend private schools or be home-schooled, if they don’t feel the public school system is right for their special, unique needs.