Quantcast
Home / Opinion / Commentary / It’s time for tax reform, here are six principles for success

It’s time for tax reform, here are six principles for success

opinion-WEB

Between health care reform, the border wall, and growing international unrest, Washington has a lot on its plate in the weeks to come. But we must make a point of prioritizing tax reform. Thirty years have passed since the last serious reforms, and our economy has been hampered by our outdated system. We haven’t achieved growth of 3 percent or higher since 2005.

U.S. Rep. David Schweikert

U.S. Rep. David Schweikert

President Trump ran on the repeated promise to undertake comprehensive tax reform that would spur job creation and stimulate economic growth. As he works with Congress to reform our nation’s tax code, we must unite around a shared vision to make taxation fairer and simpler for both businesses and individuals. Here are six principles that should guide our efforts:

Simplify the tax code. Our federal tax code is currently a 74,000-plus page document that, in 2016, forced Americans to spend 9 billion hours and $409 billion figuring out how to comply with its requirements.

Americans shouldn’t have to shell out additional money and time to determine how much money they already owe the government. Congress must lower compliance burdens so that filing a tax return is no more difficult than filling out the back of a postcard.

Broaden the tax base. For this kind of simplicity to succeed, however, Congress must eliminate the complicated and ever-increasing loopholes that make up the majority of the tax code.  Most of the loopholes benefit large corporations with powerful special interest lobbies, skewing the system against ordinary American workers and entrepreneurs.

Adam Brandon

Adam Brandon

Instead, Congress should raise the standard deduction across the board and cut the majority of specialized deductions, only retaining exceptions like charitable deductions.

Lower and consolidate individual tax rates. Simplification can also be achieved on an individual level by reducing the amount of tax brackets from our current seven-bracket system to a two-bracket or three-bracket system. This will streamline bureaucratic processes and, if rates are kept low, will give Americans more money to invest in creating new businesses, hiring new employees and investing in new markets.

Reduce corporate tax and investment tax rates. The same principle holds true on the corporate level. Our corporate tax rate is one of the highest in the world and prohibits many enterprising Americans from starting their own businesses. Reducing both the corporate tax rate and investment tax rates will make it possible for American initiative and ingenuity to flourish.

Repatriation of overseas cash. High taxes and a restrictive regulatory environment has not only blocked enterprise at home, but it has also forced American ingenuity to go abroad. Many companies have relocated overseas in search of a more welcoming business environment.

President Trump helped American corporations significantly with his executive order on regulations, but this alone will not bring American companies back home. We must find ways to incentivize these businesses to come back to our shores, bringing their capital and their jobs with them.

Tax reform, not unpaid for tax cuts. With a federal debt of nearly $20 trillion and a deficit of $559 billion for this fiscal year alone, temporary unpaid for tax cuts are not the solution to our country’s financial problems. Should these tax reforms increase the federal deficit, Congress must begin to make cuts to spending and aim for budget-neutrality.

This is a big wish list, but with Republicans in control of both chambers and a president in the White House who is unafraid of controversy, now is the time to act. Delay will only result in decades more of the piecemeal tweaks that have slowed our economy to its current standstill.

The American people have shown confidence in Republicans, and it is time for Republicans to make their own show of confidence in the American people by freeing them from their tax burdens and allowing them to invest, create and spend as they see fit.

David Schweikert represents Arizona’s 6th Congressional District and sits on the U.S. House Ways & Means Committee. Adam Brandon is the president and CEO of FreedomWorks.

___________________________________________________________

The views expressed in guest commentaries are those of the authors and are not the views of the Arizona Capitol Times.

5 comments

  1. Thomas Piketty’s “Capital in the 21st Century” illustrates the conundrum we face in determining our fiscal policy. The United States has not had sustained 3%+ annual growth since the years from WW1 through 1980. The conundrum being those years had high marginal tax rates and high inheritance taxes leading to massive investments in education and infrastructure, paying down the debt from WW2, and the United States for the first time in its history developed a middle class. Since 1980 the United States middle class has gone from owning 45% of all wealth to less than 30% … Piketty feels current trends will push the top 10% to own over 80% of everything by 2030 and the middle class to less than 20% … he (and I) are concerned about our democracy that is more about “Me” and not “Us” that takes away the vision of a better future for hundreds of millions of our citizens.

  2. As for health care reform just give us what Congress has given itself. We pay for it anyway.

  3. Hi Rep David, I completely agree with the principles you raise with one exception: lowering & consolidating tax brackets. I am not an expert, but our demographics have changed significantly over the past few decades. The ultra rich are not paying their fair share. Anyone earning more revenue than $5.0M should be in a separate bracket than someone earning $250K. $15.0M & higher even more.

    What about the hedge funds? When will their loophole & outrageously low tax rate be changed? I feel our President is surrounded by too many billionaires. Making an immediate change to hedge fund tax would garner great favor with the American people.

    Thank you for your service,

    Cathy C.

  4. I agree with the above comments. We want simple, we understand simple and we do not need any more tax lawyers helping corporations pay very little in taxes. Yes the rate may be one of the highest but what they pay is one of the lowest. Over 1,000,000 lawyers is way too many. But then again that takes in a lot of Congress…….same lesson.

  5. Most of what you address in the above piece makes a lot of sense. However, you seem to follow the popular thinking that tax breaks for corporations will mean more jobs. In what area would all these new jobs be created? More products, more services? If you have a shrinking middle class, where are the consumers for these products and services? If you distribute wealth to the wealthy, some gets invested and some just gets socked away. If you distribute wealth to the poor and middle class, it immediately goes back into the economy. Supply side economics only works for so long. Demand has to be there also…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 

x

Check Also

In this Aug. 9, 2011, photo, the sun emits a gigantic burst of radiation. (Photo courtesy of NASA)

Solar group: Prop. 127 is ‘reckless, restrictive and inflexible’

The Distributed Energy Resource Alliance (DERA), composed of solar industry companies, professionals and educators, urges Arizonans to vote no on Proposition 127.