SIERRA VISTA – Glenn Spencer is a general fighting a one-man war that, according to him, the American government doesn’t want to wage.
His battlefield is the border and his soldiers are drones, guided by seismographs and an almost-fanatical drive to develop a cheaper, more-secure system to “lock down” the U.S./Mexican borderland.
Spencer’s enemies are elusive, wily, and to him, alien. They are Latino border crossers, and whether children fleeing conflict, families seeking a better life, or suspected drug smugglers makes no difference. Spencer believes they constitute a threat large enough to warrant years of his life struggling to combat it.
After 15 years on the project, Spencer has finally built a drone system capable of locating crossers and tracking them down. His combative stance and skepticism over government has supposedly alienated the United States Border Patrol, Customs and Border Enforcement, and his local congresswoman.
That might have something to do with the fact that the Southern Poverty Law Center lists Spencer as an extremist and the group he formed, American Border Patrol, as a hate group.
“I am fighting for my country and they call me a racist for it,” Spencer said. “It’s been effective. Nobody wants to talk to a racist.”
That fight, Spencer claims, has been a nonviolent one. His drone system (called SEIDARM) uses seismographs to listen for the seismic tremors of human movement, then dispatches a drone to scan the landscape while a human operator works to identify the person moving. Spencer doesn’t chase or confront anyone he finds crossing the border – and he doesn’t report them to Border Patrol, either.
“We won’t report to the Border Patrol, we report to the people,” Spencer said.
By that, he means that he takes photos and videos of the suspected border crossers and uploads them to YouTube and his website, in an effort to demonstrate the supposed ineffectiveness of the U.S. Border Patrol.
“We are a threat to (the Border Patrol’s) system, their entire operation, their big money bags. We are at war with their management.”
This front is but one part of Spencer’s larger conflict. He believes that the Border Patrol’s “digital border” of Integrated Fixed Towers – giant radar/thermal/camera towers that watch the southern border – are overpriced at best and a scam at worst.
The Border Patrol disagrees. The towers have been part of an ongoing effort to modernize the border, and include a system of unmanned aircraft as well. On the issue, the Border Patrol released a statement saying it listens to all citizen concerns and that its tower system remains effective in Arizona.
Spencer said he believes that the feud with Border Patrol has led to a media blackout against him, quashing any sort of coverage of SEIDARM or the issues that he feels are important to the border and how it is managed. One such issue was Operation B.E.E.F. in 2009, an effort to document the types of barriers on the U.S./Mexican border and provide photos of what it looks like in the more remote sections of the border.
He’s also tried to demonstrate the uselessness of the Integrated Fixed Towers system by flying drones up to the cameras on the towers, to no response from the Border Patrol. He asserts that a number of the towers in southern Arizona don’t actually work. He claims that repeated calls to the Border Patrol about this issue have been met with silence.
“I feel an obligation to have covered this,” Spencer said. “I am a pain in the ass to the Border Patrol management. Who likes a watchdog?”
This antagonistic relationship has soured the chances of Spencer selling the SEIDARM system to the United States Border Patrol, which has been his end goal for the entirety of his project. The SEIDARM system is an alternative to a large, physical wall – or so he claims. He said he has personally spent more than $1 million on American Border Patrol and the technologies he has developed. Otherwise, the entire operation is funded from donations.
“The only customer we have is the U.S. government,” Spencer said. “Thus far, they’ve expressed no interest. We’re on a barebones budget.”
That’s because the results of the 2016 election have slowed donations by 60 percent, according to Spencer. With calls to build a wall, he feels that potential donors no longer feel his work is crucial. Spencer disagrees.
“My idea on the border has been right,” Spencer said. “CBP has been wrong this whole time. They are wasting taxpayer money and leaving the country unsafe.”
It’s this idea of a “locked down” versus “unsafe” border that pervades every element of what Spencer – and, by extension, American Border Patrol – does. It is the crux of a national argument that has pitted those calling for tougher borders against those who would label the former racists.
“The idea that I would treat people differently because of their skin is wrong, there’s no evidence of that,” Spencer said.
However, there is plenty of online evidence that says otherwise. Spencer is an outspoken proponent of the theory of the Aztlan Reconquista – a conspiracy that claims Mexican migrants are the foot soldiers of a secret invasion of the American Southwest. Allegedly, this is done as a means of retaking the territories México lost during the Mexican-American War. Part of this issue, according to Spencer, is that Latinos are a monolithic voting bloc that will swing elections at the behest of the Mexican state.
“This is demographic warfare,” Spencer said. “Nobody wants to talk about it. They will vote how they’re told to vote.”
He has produced a documentary on the subject called “Conquest of Aztlan,” using quotes from government officials on both sides of the border to show that the U.S. government is complicit as well. The secrecy needed to conceal such a movement also has an explanation. While unwilling to commit to outright saying it, Spencer suggested that part of the foundation of Hispanic culture was a reliance on deceit.
“I won’t say anything more: lying in Hispanic culture,” Spencer said. “That’s it, Google it.”
Doing so leads to pages of blog posts and anecdotal evidence on lying in Hispanic – typically Mexican – culture. Despite a lack of evidence, every hit on the first page makes a point of mentioning how lying is done to avoid difficult conversations, not maliciously – and certainly not for a secret Mexican invasion.
This imaginary threat is thin justification for Glenn Spencer’s crusade, but that doesn’t phase him. In the meantime, he will continue to do what he’s done for over a decade: keep fighting his war, one drone – one Latino “suspect” at a time.
“We need to be more creative, more inventive,” Spencer said. “But first, we need to secure the border.”
This guy is brilliant! Anyone who has looked at the geography of the border knows that there are places where it leads across mountains and rivers; how would you build a fence there? A constant drone-patrol, though, is another story. I’d recommend to this Spencer that, if the US govt. won’t listen to him, he should take his project to the state govt. of Arizona; we know full well the damage done to our economy, ecology, and security done by a constant invasion of roughly 100,000 illegals *every year* over our border — and let’s not even mention the Mexican drug cartels.
If the governor and the state legislature won’t listen to him, I can suggest another group that absolutely will: the Tohono O’odam — the Navajo nation. They’ve been fighting off invasions from Mexico since long before Columbus landed, and could tell you a lot about the real nature of the Aztecs. You won’t find Navajo politics being discussed in the local media, and very little in academia, because it doesn’t fit the popular political stereotypes — but believe me, nobody hates the Illegals more than the *real* “Natives”, and with good reason.
BTW, I wouldn’t trust information from the SPLC if I were you. The FBI doesn’t, anymore.