Home / courts / Disgraced entrepreneur who swayed AZ legislators target of federal suit

Disgraced entrepreneur who swayed AZ legislators target of federal suit

Elizabeth Holmes, the 31-year-old CEO and founder of Theranos, a blood-testing company, is lobbying for the passage of HB2645, which she says can revolutionize health care. (Photo by Gary Grado/Arizona Capitol Times)

Elizabeth Holmes

A California firm that parlayed a change in Arizona law to generate business here was charged Wednesday by federal regulators with defrauding investors with false claims about its technology – the very technology that was cited in amending the state law.

Attorneys for the Securities and Exchange Commission contend in a new lawsuit filed in federal court in California that Theranos Inc. and founder Elizabeth Holmes raised more than $700 million while making it appear the company had successfully developed a portable blood analyzer that could perform a full range of laboratory tests from a small sample of blood.

“They deceived investors by, among other things, making false and misleading statements to the media, hosting misleading technology demonstrations, and overstating the extent of Theranos’ relationships with commercial partners and government entities, to whom they had also made misrepresentations,” the lawsuit says.

The legal papers also say that Theranos, Holmes and Ramesh Balwani, the company’s former president, claimed that the company’s products were deployed by the Department of Defense in Afghanistan and that it would generate more than $100 million in revenues from that deal. As it turned out, the SEC charges, there was never such a deployment and the company generated only about $100,000 from its operations that year.

In a prepared statement from Theranos, the company said it and Holmes have agreed to settle, with Holmes paying a $500,000 fine, relinquishing control of the firm, and ineligible to serve as a director or officer of a publicly traded company for 10 years. She also will return about 18.9 million shares she obtained during the fraud.

And if the company is sold or liquidated, Holmes would not get a cent until more than $750 million is returned to defrauded investors and other preferred shareholders.

The case against Balwani will go to court.

“Innovators who seek to revolutionize and disrupt an industry must tell investors the truth about what their technology can do, not just what they hope it might do someday,” Jina Choi, director of the SEC’s regional office, said in a prepared statement.

It was that claim of being able to run tests with just a small amount of blood that led to attention not just by investors but also state lawmakers.

In 2015 Arizona lawmakers voted to make it easier for Theranos to market its testing services directly to Arizona consumers. The measure, which Gov. Doug Ducey signed at a ceremony in Scottsdale with Holmes, removed all the limits on the kind of blood, urine and other tests that patients could order on their own without first getting a doctor’s order.

As it turned out, the accuracy of some of those tests was questionable at best.

Last year Attorney General Mark Brnovich got the company to enter into a consent decree to refund more than $4.6 million to Arizonans who got the tests.

Attorneys for the company denied violating the state’s Consumer Fraud Act in selling blood tests where the tests were not always accurate. But they conceded that more than one out of every 10 of the test results given to Arizonans by the company were “ultimately voided or corrected.”

According to the Attorney General’s Office, Theranos sold 1.5 million blood tests to more than 175,000 Arizona residents between 2013 and 2016.

Theranos was separately sued by Walgreens which had allowed the company to make its tests available directly to its chain’s customers at 40 of its Arizona stores. That case was settled out of court; the terms were not disclosed.


  1. bradley taylor hudson

    The article does not say how much money Theranos gave to Ducey or other legislators. (I’m sure they are glad for that right now.) That is the problem. We don’t get to know what it cost Theranos to buy that legislation, or who they bought. We don’t know because our laws don’t require it. The lack of disclosure is designed by politicians who don’t want us to know who they serve, so they can keep claiming it is “the people”, when it is in fact the special interests whose money keeps them in office.

  2. Howie,

    A little short of your standard depth. Was she really disgraced or was she a victim of the vicious turf wars of the medical profession?

    Every measurement of any kind has what is known as a standard error. How much larger were her standard errors than the regular chemical tests? Were the standard errors going down over time as the technology improved?

    Were the regulators fair to her or were subject to “regulatory capture”- acting as agents for her competitors?

    The medical industry is incredibly expensive and kills tens of thousands of people a year.

    Now, it has destroyed this woman. Was it justified or was it a hit?

    Your article presumes the answer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also

Gov. Doug Ducey, right, sips on a cold one during a ceremony announcing a a Flagstaff craft brewery will link donations to the state Game and Fish Department to sales of one of its lines of beer. With him is Kurt Davis of the Game and Fish Commission. (Capitol Media Services photo by Howard Fischer)

Partnership allows people to drink a beer to save a deer

It's officially called "Cheers to Arizona Wildlife.''