Quantcast
Home / Opinion / Commentary / End mass incarceration crisis created by politicians

End mass incarceration crisis created by politicians

opinion-WEB

It’s easy to talk about mass incarceration in numbers.

Arizona has the fourth highest incarceration rate in the nation. Arizona’s current prison population is nearly nine times greater than the state’s prison population in 1980. On average, people released from prison last year served roughly 31 percent more time than the average person released in 2009.

But behind these numbers are real people. About 42,000 people are locked in Arizona state prisons on any given day. That’s 42,000 people who, like all of us, have their own unique stories, memories, successes, and mistakes – 42,000 people with moms, dads, brothers, sisters, children, and friends whose lives are also affected.

Alessandra Soler

Alessandra Soler

One might assume the explosive growth in Arizona’s prison population is due to a growing state population or, perhaps, a dramatic increase in crime. But an eye-opening analysis released this week by the ACLU of Arizona’s Campaign for Smart Justice proves these ideas, and many other misconceptions about mass incarceration, wrong.

The report is part of the ACLU’s 50-State Blueprints project — the first-ever comprehensive, state-by-state analysis examining the drivers of incarceration and recommending better ways to manage criminal justice.

One of the key findings is that our high incarceration rate is driven by policy choices, not crime.

We’ve heard it in political campaigns and at the state Legislature for years. Politicians use “tough-on-crime” rhetoric to gain votes without any regard for the well-being of people’s lives.

The results are policies that come at a significant cost to taxpayers – both in terms of resources and public safety – because they drive people into prison with hardly any opportunities for rehabilitation. This contributes to the likelihood that people who have served their sentence will return to prison shortly after their release.

Arizona’s mandatory minimum sentencing laws require judges to impose unnecessarily long prison sentences for many crimes, including drug crimes that make up the largest portion of prison admissions.

Once in prison, state law forces people to serve 85 percent of their sentence, removing any incentive to participate in rehabilitation programs to earn early release credit.

People aren’t getting the resources they need to ensure success upon release. Then, if they wind up back in prison, they are labeled “repeat offenders” – a term used to drive lawmakers’ and prosecutors’ narratives that all people behind bars belong there. That is not justice.

Many Arizona prosecutors, also known as county attorneys, wield tremendous influence at the Legislature and push for the extreme policies that drive mass incarceration. Just this past session, these elected officials supported a bill that would have made Arizona’s opioid epidemic even worse by requiring mandatory minimum sentences for people who sell opioids, even if they themselves are struggling with drug addiction.

This approach to mass incarceration isn’t making Arizona safer. It’s driving more people into prison for longer amounts of time and costing taxpayers billions of dollars.

It’s also having a disparate impact on people of color. Arizona has the highest rate of incarcerated Latinos in the nation and the sixth highest rate of incarcerated black people in the nation.

If harmful and reckless laws and overzealous prosecutors created this mass incarceration crisis, reform-minded lawmakers and prosecutors can help us reverse the damage.

First, the Legislature can reduce mandatory minimum sentences and reform sentencing enhancements that drive up sentencing ranges based on other criminal convictions. Arizona’s sentencing enhancement laws are among the harshest in the country.

Second, Arizona should reform its “truth in sentencing” laws and expand opportunities for people to reduce their sentences by earning credits through educational and vocational programs while in prison.

Third, Arizona should do more to reduce the number of people entering prison in the first place by investing in alternatives to incarceration that offer support services such as substance abuse treatment, mental health care, employment, housing, and vocational training.

If Arizona started on these reforms now and cut the prison population in half by 2025, we would have saved taxpayers more than $1 billion. That’s money that could be spent on education, parks, libraries, and health services.

More importantly, if Arizona started on these reforms now, we would prevent countless people from entering a system that destroys lives, families, and communities.

It’s time for Arizona lawmakers to invest in people, not prisons.

— Alessandra Soler is executive director of the ACLU of Arizona.

___________________________________________________________

The views expressed in guest commentaries are those of the author and are not the views of the Arizona Capitol Times.

3 comments

  1. bradley taylor hudson

    Money. This article is wonderful, but missed an opportunity to talk about the main driving force behind incarceration: money. All one has to do is correlate the “policy” votes and the money contributions, from private prisons, to politicians. Money drives many “policy” decisions, but this one is more obvious than most. In order to have laws that serve the people, we have to get money out of politics. As long as politicians are paid-for, they will do what makes them the most money.

  2. I agree with Bradley H. The reason there are more incarcerations is because of MONEY. Private prisons don’t have to maintain the same standards as state prisons. Cram more people in, charge AZ tax payers for it.
    We should eliminate cash bonds to get out of jail. If you have MONEY, you may get out. If you’re poor, you’re gonna pay with time.

  3. I’m so happy the ACLU continues to take this issue on. Many people don’t realize how much our out- of- control prison system robs from those things we all care about, like our schools and social services, etc. And as Bradley and Mary point out, FOLLOW THE MONEY.
    We need sentencing reform and stopping the practice of putting those with mental illnesses and addictions behind bars. The trend across the country is to divert them into treatment in the community. Many states are closing prisons and here in Arizona we continue to BUILD MORE. Bad for all of us!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 

x

Check Also

For three days in August, hundreds of residents in Parker, on the banks of the Colorado River, went without running water.  The town’s provider, Brooke Water, LLC, had a series of five water leaks and a valve break. The Arizona Corporation Commission later investigated. (Photo by Joshua Bowling/Cronkite News)

Cheap water, not lax regulation, at core of Arizona shortage

The recent New York Times article, “The Water Wars of Arizona,” goes into detail about Arizona’s diminishing water resources and blames the problem entirely on “lax regulation,” which, the author says, has enticed large corporate farms to come and suck up all the water. I’m sure they have. But “lax regulation” doesn’t come close to getting to the heart of the problem: water is too darn cheap in Arizona.