Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / courts / Attorney General files suit against vaping companies

Attorney General files suit against vaping companies

In this January 18, 2019, file photo, a man blows a cloud of smoke from a vape pipe. Bills to regulate vaping died in the 2019 Arizona legislative session, but lawmakers vow to bring them back next year. PHOTO BY STEVE HELBER/ASSOCIATED PRESS

In this January 18, 2019, file photo, a man blows a cloud of smoke from a vape pipe. PHOTO BY STEVE HELBER/ASSOCIATED PRESS

Attorney General Mark Brnovich filed suit Tuesday against two companies that make vaping products, charging that they have illegally targeted teens and mislead consumers about the amount of addictive nicotine in their products.

Brnovich charges that Juul Labs and Eonsmoke “appealed to, targeted, and exploited a generation of youth.”

In the case of Juul, the nation’s largest vaping firm, he cited ads that he said feature “young, attractive women in suggesting or casual and fun poses.” Brnovich also said the pods marketed by Juul dispense more nicotine than cigarettes but are designed to be less harsh, a tactic he said that is aimed at getting young people addicted.

Flanked by staffers, Attorney General Mark Brnovich explains Tuesday his decision to use state consumer fraud laws to sue two companies that manufacture and sell vaping devices. (Capitol Media Services photo by Howard Fischer)

Flanked by staffers, Attorney General Mark Brnovich explains Tuesday his decision to use state consumer fraud laws to sue two companies that manufacture and sell vaping devices. (Capitol Media Services photo by Howard Fischer)

For Eonsmoke, Brnovich said the company used social media accounts to find young customers. And he said the company actively marketed flavors like sour apple, pink lemonade and donut cream, which he said “any reasonable person would know would appeal to existing or potential vape users below the age of 18.”

All that, he said, is a violation of the state’s Consumer Fraud Act.

There was no immediate response from either company.

The lawsuits come after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has raised the age for the sale of vaping and other tobacco products to 21. That agency also outlawed the sale of most flavors.

Even Brnovich acknowledged that both companies halted many of the practices cited in the lawsuit, practices he wants a state judge to enjoin the firms from doing in the future.

But he denied that the lawsuits – and the press conference to announce them – were simply designed to generate publicity for him and his office. And Brnovich brushed aside the FDA directive.

“I’m not going to rely on Washington, D.C. to solve Arizona problems,” he said. “In fact, I would submit that Washington, D.C. is where good ideas go to die.”


And even if the companies are no longer engaging in the acts in the complaint, Brnovich said the state still needs to take legal action.

“Someone has to pay the consequences for what they’ve done in the past,” he said.

That goes to the parts of the lawsuit which seek to “disgorge” the companies of profits they had made from underage Arizonans who were targeted and deceived. He also wants penalties of up to $10,000 for each knowing violation of the law.

Arizona isn’t the first state to file such lawsuits.

Attorneys general in California, North Carolina and New York also have gone to court, specifically against Juul, alleging that the company’s marketing practices have contributed to deaths and injuries nationwide. Those claims also charge misleading sales tactics.

Brnovich said those are irrelevant – at least as far as Arizona is concerned. And in some ways, he said, it’s about money.

“If the state of, I don’t know, California sues, that’s not going to have any sort of financial impact on Arizona,” Brnovich explained.

“I want to make sure part of what these lawsuits are about is disgorging the profits,” he continued. “If you have companies that manipulate a nicotine content, didn’t disclose information, if they intentionally tried to target youths here in Arizona, I think Arizonans and Arizona families deserve some sort of compensation for that.”

He said not pursuing such a claim would be like someone whose car was wrecked by another’s liability simply being satisfied with an apology and no compensation to fix the vehicle.

“And, at the end of the day, if you don’t hold companies accountable, then you’re not going to deter other companies from doing so in the future.”

Less clear is who gets any cash that Brnovich manages to recover.

“I think at this point that’s a little premature,” Brnovich said.

“It depends on if you are able to identify individuals who have specifically been harmed,” he said. “There’s also issues of communities that have been harmed.”


He compared it to lawsuits filed by multiple states, including Arizona, against opioid makers and distributors.

“Part of the responsibility of the opioid manufacturers is to make sure that there’s restitution to the communities that are impacted by this

There actually are other lawsuits aimed at recouping costs. That includes a nationwide class-action claim joined by several school districts, including Tucson Unified School District, that seek financial compensation to deal with rising use of tobacco vaping products.

But Brnovich said there’s a crucial difference between what he filed Tuesday and the class-action lawsuit where the various government agencies are being represented by private counsel.

“I don’t want to see plaintiffs’ lawyers enriched,” he said. “I want to see money going into the communities and the schools that have been impacted by this crisis.”

The lawsuit comes as a new fight looms at the Capitol over how extensively to regulate vaping products in Arizona.

Last year Sen. Heather Carter, R-Cave Creek, pushed a bill through the Senate to treat vaping like tobacco. That would subject retailers to the same penalties for underage sales and make vaping illegal in public places, restaurants and buildings, just as it is for cigarettes.

But that bill faltered in the House which backed a plan by Rep. John Allen, R-Scottsdale which proposed a whole separate regulatory scheme for vaping. While it would have raised the age for purchase to 21, it also would have precluded local governments from enacting stricter rules, including licensing requirements and criminal penalties for sales to minors.

A similar battle looms when the Legislature reconvenes later this month.

One comment

  1. It is about time we have someone who evidently isn’t too interested in the money trail as most of the
    politicians seem to be!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also

Supreme Court tosses effort to disqualify GOP candidates (access required)

The Arizona Supreme Court said three people allegedly involved in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol can be on the 2022 ballot.

/* code for tag */