Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Opinion / Commentary / Arizona’s Parole Merry-go-Round

Arizona’s Parole Merry-go-Round


State-run parole and probation programs are designed to keep persons convicted of crimes—including a very large number of non-violent crimes—out of prison.  But in Arizona, according to a recent Council of State Governments study, Confined and Costly: How Supervision Violations are Filling Prisons, “On any given day 9,825 people (or 23% of the 2018 Arizona prison population) are behind bars as a result of a probation or parole violation, at an annual cost to the state of $249 million.”

Parole and probation are court-ordered, non-prison sentences that give offenders a chance to rebuild their lives in a community setting. Not a get-out-of-jail-free-card, each offender agrees to follow a strictly supervised list of conditions that commonly includes mandatory drug testing, keeping regular parole officer visits, paying fines and restitution, holding a job and drug rehab and anger management classes.

More restrictive conditions may include searches, prior approval to open a checking account, travel restrictions, electronic monitoring, curfews and off-limit establishments.

Each year about one-quarter of all persons under community supervision successfully complete the terms of their parole and probation and are released. What about the others, many of whom struggle with a mental illness or addiction, low education attainment, poor employment skills and their inability to pay for drug testing or administrative and electronic monitoring fees.  (Yes, many parolees are required to pay these fees themselves.)

For them, repeated violations of even relatively minor rules can lead to a disciplinary hearing, additional restrictions or a ride on the probation & parole-to-prison merry-go-round. In fact, the Council of State Government’s report found that 44% of all persons admitted to Arizona prisons in 2017 were placed behind bars for parole or probation violations, including conviction for new offenses.

But sooner or later these back-to-prison inmates will return on parole once again with a new set of supervised restrictions to deal with.

The size of Arizona’s merry-go-round is staggering. For the years 2014-2017, according to the federal Bureau of Justice Statistics, prison admissions totaled 56,195. During this four-year period it is likely that as many as 19,000 men and women (34% X 56,195) were returned to prison not for breaking any law but for violating their parole and probation rules.

If Arizona’s parole and probation programs had worked as intended during 2014-2017, thousands of offenders would not have been locked behind bars but would have remained under community supervision—where they could work on putting their lives back together. That would have dramatically lowered the state’s prison population and saved Arizona taxpayers about $25,000 a year for each inmate remaining out of prison. How might this happen?

A 2018 report from the PEW Charitable Trusts titled “Probation and Parole Systems Marked by High Stakes, Missed Opportunities, found that one in 55 adults nationally—and one of every 62 Arizona adults—are on probation or parole. The report also found that many states are already working to strengthen the effectiveness of their probation and parole programs.

“Policymakers across the nation,” the authors write, “are adopting reforms, such as shorter supervision terms and earned compliance credits, and to prioritize supervision and treatment resources for higher-risk individuals while removing lower-risk people from supervision caseloads.”

In practice this requires that states “Fundamentally change the purpose of supervision from punishing failure to promoting success. The goal should be to help people repair the harm they have caused and become self-sufficient, law-abiding citizens, rather than simply enforcing rules set by courts and parole boards, catching violators and imposing penalties, including incarceration.”

As these reforms are put into practice prison populations will go down, state taxes will go down and, best of all, thousands of Arizonans will stand a better chance of putting prison life behind them for good.

Ronald Fraser, Ph.D., writes on public policy issues for the DKT Liberty Project, a Washington-based civil liberties organization.



    On the issue of Arizona and the Department of Corrections parole release program. Arizona as of June 19, 2020 has seen a spike in COV-ID cases both in the community and prisons.
    Upon release from prison, persons are not tested nor supplied with masks or other protective gear. Prior to release on parole, they are required to provide an address where they will be living while on paper, and the parole officer makes contact with that person.
    I’ve agreed to will allow the paroled inmate to live with me. The officer showed up unannounced and without a face mask.
    The concern is this: ADC does not have a plan in place to socially isolate inmates who are released into the community, to their families or half-way houses; which puts everyone involved at risk.
    Per website, the board considers public protection, victim concerns, and offender circumstances when they grant parole. It doesn’t seem consistent with the circumstances surrounding COVID.

  2. In October of 2019 my husband was sentenced to prison for 21 months, (17 months/with good behavior), for the crime of violating his probation. None of his offences were considered violent ones, and he was a first time offended. He was a model prisoner, got work within the prison, and completed programs. On January 29th, of this year the prison granted him early release. However, he caught Covid 19 before he was released. They still released him on January 29th. They took him to a old motel in Phoenix, AZ. They assigned a case worker to him, and gave him a mask. The case worker told him that he was under quarantine, but could leave the motel for supply’s, just as long as he wore a mask. The case worker was supposed to check on him daily, (WHICH SHE DIDN’T!), and the motel did not have a phone, nor a 24 hr office staff. So basically, if he had had complications with his Covid-19, there would have been no way for him to get emergency services. I find it unacceptable how the AZ prison release program is ran. It’s DESPICABLE!

  3. My son got COVID twice in prison and is now vaccinated. I am arranging a sober living apartment for him; I already got him enrolled in school, and my friend has a business and has offered him a job. If he didn’t have me to help him, I don’t know what would happen to him. So many people fall through the cracks. It’s beyond sad.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also

censorship, books, school board elections, Scottsdale Unified School District, candidates, Critical Race Theory

Parents of K-12 students need to be aware of dangerous school board candidates

For a majority of the million-plus K-12 children in Arizona, public education is the backbone for their future. It is a travesty that several groups are doing everything in their power to control the thought processes of the younger generation.